DC Court Issues Latest DSH Decision

King & Spalding
Contact

On January 30, the D.C. District Court issued the latest ruling relating to the proper calculation of hospitals’ disproportionate share hospital (“DSH”) payment.  See Catholic Health Initiatives - Iowa Corp. d/b/a Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines v. Sebelius, Case 1:10-cv-00411-RCL (Jan. 30, 2012), available here.  The question in this case was whether the Secretary’s exclusion of dual-eligible (i.e., Medicare and Medicaid-eligible) patient days for which a patient’s Medicare Part A benefits have been exhausted from the Medicaid Fraction component of the DSH calculation was permissible. The case involved the hospital’s 1997 fiscal year.  Among other arguments, the hospital argued that under the DSH statute, which defines the Medicaid Fraction as containing patient days for “patients who (for such days) were eligible for medical assistance under [Medicaid] but who were not entitled to benefits under part A of [Medicare],” dual-eligible Part A exhausted days belong in the Medicaid Fraction.  The theory behind this argument is that “entitlement” to Part A benefits is synonymous with “payment”—if a day is not paid by Part A because the patient’s Part A benefits are exhausted, then the patient was not “entitled to benefits under Part A” for that day. 

The court did not reach the merits of the hospital’s statutory arguments, which would have involved the application of Chevron analysis.  Instead, the court analyzed CMS’s historic policy with respect to the DSH treatment of Part A Exhausted days and found that the agency’s original policy was to include these days in the Medicaid Fraction.   The court further found that the earliest possible iteration of the agency’s current policy (that “entitlement” does not equal “payment,” and that Part A benefits exhausted days must be excluded from the Medicaid Fraction) was made in 2000, with a CMS Administrator Decision, which was followed by a more official statement in a 2004 preamble discussion.  As a result, the court held that the prohibition against retroactive rulemaking prevented the Secretary from applying its  policy change to the hospital’s fiscal year 1997, and that dual-eligible, Part A benefits exhausted days must be included in the Medicaid Fraction component of the hospital’s DSH calculation.

Please see full update below for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide