DC Court of Appeals Orders Rehearing of PHH v. CFPB

by Goodwin
Contact

On February 16, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit granted Respondent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) petition for rehearing en banc of PHH Corp. v. CFPB, No. 15-1177 (D.C. Cir.).  In doing so, the court vacated its October 11, 2016, order, which had held, inter alia, that the CFPB’s single-director structure that permitted removal of the director only “for cause” was unconstitutional.  To remedy what the court found was a constitutional violation, the court had severed the “for-cause” provision of the Dodd-Frank Act in its October 11th order.  LenderLaw Watch previously reported on the PHH case here, here and here.

The case will now be reheard by the D.C. Circuit en banc on May 24, 2017.  The order granting rehearing indicates that Chief Judge Garland did not participate.  The court set a briefing schedule leading up to the May 24th oral argument:  Petitioners’ and amici curiae briefs are due on March 10, 2017; Respondent’s and amici curiae briefs are due on March 31, 2017; and Petitioners’ reply brief is due on April 10, 2017.

The court directed the parties to address three discrete issues in their briefs:

  1. “Is the CFPB’s structure as a single-Director independent agency consistent with Article II of the Constitution and, if not, is the proper remedy to sever the for-cause provision of the statute?”
  2. “May the court appropriately avoid deciding that constitutional question given the panel’s ruling on the statutory issues in this case?”
  3. “If the en banc court, which has today separately ordered an en banc consideration of Lucia v. SEC, 832 F.3d 277 (D.C. Cir. 2016), concludes in that case that the administrative law judge who handled that case was an inferior officer rather than an employee, what is the appropriate disposition of this case?”

As to the third question, in Lucia v. SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had rejected the petitioners’ argument that their administrative hearing (concerning alleged violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the rule against misleading advertising) was unconstitutional because the presiding administrative law judge (ALJ) was unconstitutionally appointed.  832 F.3d 277, 280 (D.C. Cir. 2016).  The petitioners argued to the D.C. Circuit that “the Commission’s decision and order … should be vacated because the ALJ rendering the initial decision was a constitutional Officer who was not appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause,” U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2.  832 F.3d at 283.  The court rejected the petitioners’ argument and concluded that the ALJ was an “employee,” not an “inferior officer,” and thus was not required to be appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause.  Id. at 288.  However, this ruling is now unsettled given the D.C. Circuit’s decision to rehear the issue in Lucia en banc.

As it relates here, Senior Circuit Judge Randolph’s concurrence in the October 11, 2016 PHH order stated:  “I believe that the ALJ who presided over the hearing was an ‘inferior Officer’ within the meaning of Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution.  That constitutional provision requires ‘inferior officers’ to be appointed by the President, the ‘Courts of Law,’ or the ‘Heads of Departments.’  This ALJ was not so appointed.  Pursuant to an agreement between the Bureau and the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge assigned him to the case.  This in itself rendered the proceeding against petitioners unconstitutional.”  PHH Corp. v. CFPB, No. 15-1177 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016) (Randolph J., concurring).

The effect of the rehearing in the PHH case is that the CFPB’s single-director management structure is unsettled at least until the May 24, 2017 hearing.  And it appears that the D.C. Circuit’s focus on persons who are deemed “inferior officers” under the Appointments Clause in two pending matters before the Circuit may have a significant role in its ruling.  LenderLaw Watch will provide continue to provide updates on the PHH case.

Goodwin attorneys Tom Hefferon and Willy Jay were among the counsel for PHH on this appeal.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Goodwin
Contact
more
less

Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.