Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Significance of Deal Price in Appraisal Cases

by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Key Points

  • For the second time in 2017, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Chancery Court’s decision to assign little or no weight to deal price in appraisal cases
  • In both cases, the court remained firm in its decision not to adopt a presumption in favor of deal price
  • The decision leaves some confusion as to whether or not deal price should be the default standard absent mitigating factors

When Delaware Chancery courts consider the “fair value” of shares transacted in a merger, they need not consider deal price—except when they must. On December 14, 2007, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dell, Inc. v. Magnetar Global Event Driven Master Fund, Ltd., Case No. 565, 2016, the latest in a series of noteworthy “appraisal arbitrage” cases that made their way through Delaware Chancery Courts in 2017.

Appraisal arbitrage cases involve stockholders who complain, as a matter of right under Delaware statutory law, that the price per share to be paid upon the close of a merger is too low and does not reflect the shares’ actual value. Under Delaware law, the Chancery Court is empowered to appraise the shares and determine their fair value. However, the law provides little guidance as to whether, or to what extent, the negotiated deal price should be considered in the court’s assessment. This ambiguity led to two high-profile 2017 Delaware Supreme Court cases.

In an earlier 2017 appraisal decision styled DFC Global Corp. v. Muirfield Value Partners LP, Chancellor Bouchard discounted the negotiated deal price in that case as unreliable for calculating the company’s fair value, opting to give the price little weight. On appeal, the Delaware Supreme Court rejected the Chancery Court’s reasoning for discounting the deal price, separately noting that “second-guessing the value arrived upon by the collective views of many sophisticated parties with a real stake in the matter is hazardous.”

Critically, however, the Delaware Supreme Court in DFC expressly refused to craft a statutory presumption in favor of deal price and instead instructed the Chancery Court on remand to “exercise its considerable discretion” in determining fair value. The Delaware Supreme Court further cautioned the Chancery Court to avoid the temptation of taking competing valuations and simply averaging them together, noting that, under certain circumstances, the most appropriate action may be giving no weight to certain factors or complete deference to others.

Although far from identical to the DFC case, the Dell appraisal dispute presented similar problems for the Delaware Supreme Court only a few months later. In Dell, former stockholders of the company challenged the fair value of Dell shares purchased for $13.75 per share in a management-sponsored, leveraged buyout. Following a trial, the Chancery Court determined that the fair value of the shares was actually $17.62 each, which, as noted by the Delaware Supreme Court, meant a company valuation of roughly $7 billion more than the original transaction price.

In the trial court opinion, Vice Chancellor Laster explained in detail his decision to give no weight to negotiated deal price in his fair value calculations. In particular, the Vice Chancellor highlighted at least three chief concerns with the deal process. First, the market value of Dell’s stock was unduly depressed by the short-term focus of the company’s investor base, which yielded a “valuation gap” between Dell’s fundamental and market values. Second, the lack of competition from strategic buyers meant that the deal price unduly leaned toward the investment goals of financial sponsors, who are more concerned with obtaining a favorable return on their investment rather than achieving a fair value for the company shares themselves. Third, the prices resulting from the deal process were unreliable because they resulted from a management-led buyout, which carries a number of problems in fairly approximating fair value.

On appeal, the Delaware Supreme Court rejected each of the Chancery Court’s reasons for disregarding the deal price of the Dell shares. In its opinion, the Delaware Supreme Court repeatedly suggested that the deal price in that case should be given heavy, “if not overriding, probative value.” However, like in the DFC opinion, the Delaware Supreme Court expressly declined to adopt “a presumption that the deal price reflects fair value if certain preconditions are met,” citing the statutory requirement that the Chancery Court consider “all relevant factors” in determining fair value. Accordingly, the Delaware Supreme Court limited its holding to the facts in that case, stating that the overwhelming evidence surrounding the Dell merger favored using deal price as a substantial factor in determining fair value of the Dell shares. Thus, it was an abuse of discretion for the Chancery Court to completely discount deal price in its calculations.

It is unclear yet whether Dell represents the definitive, or merely the latest, appraisal arbitrage case considering the importance of deal price. As in DFC, the Delaware Supreme Court’s opinion in Dell does little to ease the tension that currently exists between the statutory requirement that the Chancery Court consider “all relevant factors” in appraisal arbitrage cases and the Delaware Supreme Court’s apparent emphasis on one factor—deal price—so long as the circumstances do not clearly undermine it as an approximation of fair value. However, the detailed reasoning set forth in the DFC and Dell opinions provides clear guidance of at least one thing: if the Chancery Court declines to give any weight to deal price in calculating fair value, it must provide good reason for doing so, or it will likely be called by the Delaware Supreme Court to try again.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.