Denied: Full D.C. Circuit Declines To Review Former NLRB Member Wilcox’s Suit Challenging Her Termination

Proskauer - Labor Relations Update

On January 28, 2026, the D.C. Circuit declined former National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) member Gwynne Wilcox’s request for en banc review of its prior decision upholding her termination, which we covered here

Wilcox’s suit challenges President Donald Trump’s decision to fire her without cause, despite the for-cause protection contained in Section 3 of the National Labor Relations Act. The D.C. Circuit did not provide reasoning for its denial of the request for review.

The D.C. Circuit’s refusal to rehear Wilcox’s suit means that the court’s decision from December 2025 stands.   

Wilcox, who was fired in January 2025, asked that the D.C. Circuit hold her case in abeyance until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a case regarding President Trump’s firing of a member of the Federal Trade Commission, which similarly has for-cause job protection for key agency officials. President Trump’s decision to fire Wilcox without cause was unprecedented and challenged the Supreme Court’s 1935 landmark decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which limited the president’s ability to remove top officers of administrative agencies.

The immediate effect of the D.C. Circuit’s decision is that Wilcox will not return to the NLRB, which regained a quorum in December 2025, as we covered here. The NLRB therefore remains with two Republican-appointed members, and one Democratic-appointed member. In January 2026, the NLRB issued its first published decisions since regaining a quorum, empowering regional directors to process charges, conduct union elections, and take other administrative action should the Board lose a quorum again.

The potential long-term effects of the D.C. Circuit’s decision depend greatly on how the Supreme Court rules on whether the Constitution permits Congress to codify for-cause job protections for key officials at federal agencies.   

We will continue to track relevant court decisions and related developments at the Board.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Proskauer - Labor Relations Update

Written by:

Proskauer - Labor Relations Update
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Proskauer - Labor Relations Update on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide