Disgorgement Continues at the SEC

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes
Contact

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

On October 12, 2021, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a disgorgement order issued by the SEC, in—according to the opinion— the first appellate ruling on the topic since the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Liu v. SEC.

In SEC v. Blackburn et al., the three defendants-appellants were charged by the SEC with failing to register millions of shares sold in a penny stock company, in violation of sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. These sales raised millions of dollars from unsophisticated investors, all while the defendants were alleged to have misrepresented the company’s results and deceived investors. The misrepresentations and deception led to additional allegations that the defendants violated section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and section 17(a) of the Securities Act.

The district court found in favor of the SEC on summary judgment and, among other things, ordered disgorgement of profits and imposed civil monetary penalties. The defendants appealed, arguing that Liu had redefined the Commission’s statutory ability to order disgorgement. While the Supreme Court in Liu found that the SEC has the statutory authority to order disgorgement, it may not do so in a punitive manner; thus, disgorgement cannot exceed the defendants’ net profits and must be awarded for victims.

The defendant-appellants argued the disgorgement order did not satisfy these new requirements. The Fifth Circuit disagreed, finding the disgorgement amounts were the profits the individual defendants received from their fraud and the district court had properly assessed each defendant’s gain individually, rather than imposing joint-and-several liability. The Court also found it important that the SEC had identified the victims of the defendants’ fraud and created a process for the return of disgorged funds; while the Commission would initially receive the recovered funds under this process, the Commission would then distribute the funds to victims after seeking district court approval, thereby acting as a de facto trustee.

According to the Fifth Circuit, this process “easily” satisfied the requirements set forth in Liu. It also, however, identified a more difficult question that it did not attempt to answer: whether disgorgement is “awarded for victims” when the recovered funds are put into a Treasury fund that helps “pay whistleblowers reporting securities fraud and to fund the activities of the Inspector General.” Unlike Blackburn, insider trading cases do not typically involve individual, identifiable victims. Accordingly, the SEC has historically used this type of process to collect disgorged funds It remains to be seen whether, after Liu, such a process will withstand judicial scrutiny.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes
Contact
more
less

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.