Dispute Resolution Options in Asia – Expanding the Menu: Arbitration, Mediation and Singapore’s New International Commercial Court

King & Spalding


In the past five years, the international dispute resolution landscape in Asia has evolved at a rapid pace. Singapore and Hong Kong have emerged as leading global centres for dispute resolution, and have been at the forefront of many institutional and legislative developments. But change has not been confined to these two jurisdictions. There have been significant developments across Asia in the race to offer users the next best thing in international dispute resolution. These include major legislative changes, arbitration rules revisions, and the opening of new state-of-the-art facilities for mediation and arbitration.1

This article focuses on Singapore and Hong Kong, as the leading international dispute resolution hubs in the region. It first discusses some of the key developments in international arbitration in those jurisdictions. It then explores two recent developments in mediation and litigation in Singapore, namely the launch of the Singapore International Mediation Centre and the Singapore International Commercial Court. Finally, it looks to the future, and identifies a few developments that are currently in the pipeline. 

Developments in International Arbitration

A 2015 leading international arbitration survey ranks Hong Kong and Singapore as the third and fourth most preferred and widely used seats in International Arbitration globally, behind the traditional arbitration hubs of London and Paris. Singapore has also been voted the most improved arbitral seat over the past five years, with Hong Kong coming in second place. This was based on factors such as better hearing facilities, availability of quality arbitrators who are familiar with the seat, better local arbitral institutions and improvements to the national arbitration law..2

For instance, the HKIAC launched renovated and expanded premises in October 2012, not long after Singapore launched Maxwell Chambers, a dedicated centre for arbitration and mediation services in January 2010. The new Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance came into effect on June 1, 2011, substantially based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (including many of the 2006 revisions). Singapore’s International Arbitration Act was most recently updated in 2012. 

In the same 2015 survey, HKIAC and SIAC are ranked as the third and fourth most preferred arbitral institutions, behind the institutional leaders for the past 10 years, the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). The HKIAC has been voted the most improved arbitral institution over the last five years, with the SIAC coming in second place. This was based on factors such as reputation and recognition, greater efficiency, high level of administration and introduction of innovative new features in the arbitral rules.3 This is also borne out by the steady rise in number of new cases filed at each institution. The SIAC has seen the number of new cases rise from 99 in 2008 to 222 in 2014 (down slightly from an all-time high of 259 in 2013). Reflecting a similar trend, the number of new fully administered cases filed at the HKIAC has risen from 16 in 2010 to 110 in 2014.4

The SIAC substantially revised its rules in 2010 (and further modified them in 2013, when it introduced the SIAC Court of Arbitration) and the HKIAC conducted a major revision of its rules in 2013. Among the “innovative features” introduced into the SIAC and HKIAC Arbitration Rules were provisions for emergency arbitrators, an expedited procedure, and guidelines on the use of arbitral secretaries. 

-- Emergency Arbitrators

In July 2010, the SIAC became the first international arbitral institution based in Asia to introduce emergency arbitrator provisions.5 This was followed by the HKIAC in 2013.6 These provisions allow a party to seek interim relief from an emergency arbitrator prior to the constitution of the tribunal and without having to resort to the courts. The SIAC Rules provide for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator within one business day and the HKIAC Rules provide for such an appointment to be made within two days. As of October 1, 2015, a total of 46 applications for emergency arbitrator relief had been filed with the SIAC (27 of which were granted, including in part and by consent).7 The procedure has a good track record in terms of both speed and effectiveness: SIAC emergency arbitrator orders or awards have been issued, on average, around 8 to 10 days after hearing the parties, and in some cases only two days after doing so.8 We understand that SIAC emergency arbitrator orders and awards have in most instances been voluntarily complied with, and where that is not the case they have been given effect to by courts, including outside of Singapore.9

The availability of emergency arbitrator relief is particularly useful in situations where interim relief from a court is either not available or would be ineffective, where confidentiality is a key concern, or where a creative interim solution is sought. The high degree of voluntary compliance with orders and awards of Emergency Arbitrators has been attributed to the fact that parties do not want to lose credibility before the main tribunal, once constituted. 

-- Expedited Procedure 

Another innovation introduced by the SIAC in 2010 was the expedited procedure. This is a procedure which provides for the arbitration to be determined by a sole arbitrator within six months after being appointed, with a reasoned award in summary form. Either party may apply for the adoption of the emergency procedure where: (i) the amount in dispute does not exceed the equivalent of SGD 5 million (approx. USD 3.6 million); (ii) the parties so agree, or (iii) in cases of exceptional urgency.10 A similar provision is contained in the HKIAC Rules, with a HKD 25 million (approx. USD 3.2 million) threshold amount.11 In Singapore, the expedited procedure has proved popular, with SIAC reporting a total of 216 applications since 2010 (of which 132 were granted) as of October 1, 2015.12 Singapore courts have also demonstrated a willingness to uphold the application of the expedited procedure under the SIAC Rules, even where the arbitration agreement was entered into before the expedited procedure was introduced into the SIAC Rules.13

It is of course open to the parties to agree in their dispute resolution clauses for the expedited procedure to apply to all disputes, and the SIAC provides a specific model clause for this.14 This may be useful for straightforward agreements and/or where significant amounts are not at stake. In more complex disputes, parties could also consider whether the threshold amount is appropriate. For instance, in large transactions, the parties may decide that a “small” dispute is one with less than, say, USD 10 million in dispute; the parties could therefore opt for the expedited procedure to apply in all disputes with a value of less than USD 10 million. 

-- Guidelines on Use of Arbitral Secretaries

The HKIAC and SIAC have also responded to concerns regarding the use of tribunal secretaries. In an effort to more clearly define the role of arbitral secretaries, the HKIAC has issued detailed provisions regarding the appointment, removal, remuneration and duties of tribunal secretaries and defining the tasks that can be performed by a secretary, subject to party agreement or tribunal direction.15 The HKIAC is also offering the services of members of the HKIAC Secretariat to act as tribunal secretaries. The SIAC has also introduced a practice note on the appointment of arbitral secretaries.16

*      *      *

Thus, both in Singapore and Hong Kong, there has been a pattern of regular revisions to the arbitral rules and arbitration laws to pioneer new developments, and to take account of international best practices developed elsewhere. This process of regular upgrading and refinement has resulted in substantial convergence between the arbitration laws and institutional rules in Singapore and Hong Kong (as well as in other jurisdictions across the region). There still remain some key differences,17 but these are really differences in emphasis rather than approach. 

The choice of arbitral seat is a key decision for the successful resolution of any dispute. As a general rule, if a party is not willing to litigate in the courts of a particular jurisdiction, it should be wary of seating its arbitration there – because it is those courts which will supervise and support (or undermine) the arbitral process and rule on the validity of an arbitral award, if challenged. It is therefore not a good idea to experiment with seats. Beyond Singapore and Hong Kong, there are some other good seats in the region. But there are also plenty to be avoided. The best approach with arbitral seats (as with institutions) is to stick to the tried and tested, and to keep things simple. Within Asia, Singapore and Hong Kong are not the only options, but they are a good place to start. 

Developments in Mediation and Litigation

Looking beyond the arbitration “market”, Singapore has recently sought to expand its menu of international dispute resolution offerings. Specifically, within the last year it has launched the Singapore International Mediation Centre (“SIMC”) and the Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”). These reflect a deliberate strategy by the Singapore government to build on its success as a hub for international arbitration by expanding its “product lines.” The stated goal is that the SIMC and SICC should be complementary of international arbitration and the SIAC, and not in competition with it.18

-- The Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC)

The SIMC was launched on November 5, 2014 and provides mediation services targeted at the needs of parties in cross-border commercial disputes, particularly those doing business in Asia. The SIMC maintains an international panel of mediators, as well as a panel of technical experts who can be appointed to assist the mediator in the conduct of the mediation. 

An innovative feature of the SIMC is its interaction with the SIAC through a new “Arb-Med-Arb” protocol (“AMA Protocol”). The AMA Protocol provides for the use of mediation during the arbitral process, as follows: (i) a dispute will first be filed with the SIAC and the tribunal constituted; (ii) after the exchange of the Notice of Arbitration and Response to the Notice of Arbitration, the arbitration will be stayed pending the outcome of mediation at SIMC, to be completed within eight weeks; (iii) if a settlement is reached, the parties may request that the terms of the settlement be recorded by the tribunal in the form of a consent award; if not, the arbitration will resume. 

The advantage of this process is that a successful mediation can result in a consent award (and therefore be directly enforceable), rather than just an agreement. Also, by allowing parties to commence arbitration before referring the dispute to mediation, the AMA Protocol presents a useful alternative to multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses (e.g., providing that parties first submit disputes to mediation, followed by arbitration). These clauses, if not properly complied with before commencing arbitration (as is common), could result in the tribunal lacking jurisdiction.19 They can therefore prove particularly problematic where contractual time bars or statutory limitation periods are due to expire. Also, by providing for mediation after the parties have exchanged their Notice of Arbitration and Response (rather than before), the AMA Protocol may increase the prospects of a successful mediation, as each party will have had an opportunity to set out its case in the arbitration and see the other side’s arguments. 

The SIAC and SIMC provide a model clause for using the AMA Protocol.20 We think it is worth considering as an alternative to a traditional multi-tiered (mediation then arbitration) clause. 

-- The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC)

The SICC was launched on January 5, 2015, and received its first case in May 2015 (transferred from the Singapore High Court).21

The SICC operates as a division of the Singapore High Court, with appeals to be heard by the Court of Appeal (Singapore’s highest court). Key features of the SICC include: 

  • International Judges. In addition to the existing panel of Singapore judges, the SICC has local and international jurists appointed to its panel. These include current and former judges from the courts of Austria, Delaware, Dubai, England and Wales, France, Hong Kong and New South Wales.22 The SICC Practice Directions provide that proceedings in the Court will generally be presided over by a single judge (but may be heard by three judges), and an appeal to the Court of Appeal will generally be heard by three or more judges.23
  • Jurisdiction to hear international commercial disputes. The SICC has jurisdiction to hear an action where: (i) the claim is of an international and commercial nature; (ii) the parties have submitted to the SICC’s jurisdiction in a written jurisdiction agreement; and (iii) the parties do not seek any relief in the form of, or connected with, a prerogative order (e.g., for constitutional claims). Even in the absence of the parties’ express submission to the SICC, the Singapore High Court may transfer cases to the SICC of its own motion, and has in fact already done this in at least one pending case.
  • Power to join third parties. The SICC has the power to join third parties (other than states or sovereigns of states) to the proceedings, with or without the third party’s consent.
  • Representation by foreign lawyers. Unlike regular High Court proceedings, foreign lawyers who are registered with the SICC can appear in “offshore cases” (cases with no substantial connection to Singapore). Among the first foreign lawyers registered with the court are King & Spalding partners John Savage and Stuart Issacs QC.
  • Exclusion or limitation of right of appeal (by agreement). Parties may exclude a right of appeal to the Singapore Court of Appeal, or may limit it to specified grounds. An agreement to exclude the right of appeal altogether would therefore render the SICC’s first instance judgment or order final and binding on the parties, with no further recourse.
  • Establishment of foreign law by submissions from counsel. Unlike in High Court proceedings under the domestic rules of evidence, the applicable foreign law can be established by submissions from counsel, rather than proven as a question of fact through expert evidence.24
  • Not bound by domestic rules of evidence. The SICC is not bound to apply any rule of evidence under Singapore law and may apply other rules of evidence (whether found in foreign law or otherwise) upon the application of a party. The court could, for example, decide to adopt the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence (“IBA Rules”) (commonly used in international arbitration) instead.
  • More limited discovery / disclosure. The document production rules in the SICC are similar to those found in the IBA Rules, requiring parties to make specific requests to produce documents on grounds of relevance and materiality, as compared to general discovery in domestic court proceedings, which require production of all relevant documents within the party’s possession.
  • Confidentiality. While the default position in commercial arbitration is confidentiality, proceedings before the SICC take place by default in open court. However, parties can agree on confidentiality (although the Court is not bound by party agreement) or apply to the Court for a confidentiality order. The Court may order that the case be heard in camera, that no person must reveal or publish any information or document relating to the case, and/or the Court file be sealed.25

Thus, the SICC shares some of the perceived advantages of international arbitration over domestic court litigation. For instance, it is not bound by domestic rules of evidence, foreign law is determined on the basis of party submissions, rather than evidence, parties can be represented by foreign counsel, and although not the default position, parties can eliminate any right of appeal (by agreement) and can provide for confidentiality. 

Possible advantages that the SICC holds over international arbitrations are the availability of third party joinder, summary and default judgment and appeal (although parties may agree to limit or exclude their rights of appeal). 

At the same time, the SICC lacks key features of arbitration, such as the parties’ ability to nominate their arbitrator(s), and crucially, the relative ease of enforcement of arbitral awards. 

An SICC judgment is a judgment of the Singapore Court and its enforceability depends on the principles governing the recognition of foreign judgments in the relevant enforcement jurisdiction. As a judgment of a division of the High Court of Singapore, SICC judgments can be enforced through reciprocal arrangements with several commonwealth jurisdictions, including the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and India, as well as in Hong Kong. The hope is that the number of jurisdictions in which SICC judgments can be enforced will increase further with the entering into force of the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements on October 1, 2015. The Hague Convention (for judgments) is intended to operate as a parallel regime to the New York Convention (for arbitral awards), providing for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments of one state in the courts of another state (subject to limited exceptions).26 However, while 156 countries are parties to the New York Convention as of October 2015, the Hague Convention has only entered into force in 27 countries (Mexico and the European Union member states except Denmark) and has been signed but not yet ratified by Singapore and the United States.

The SICC website provides model clauses for submission to the jurisdiction of the SICC before and after a dispute arises, and for the exclusion and limitation of the right and scope of appeal.27

The SICC is an innovative development, offering parties a hybrid alternative – an Asia-based dispute resolution mechanism which is neither traditional domestic court litigation nor international arbitration. It could have particular appeal for parties who instinctively prefer court litigation to arbitration (e.g., because of the availability of third party joinder, summary judgment, open court proceedings, or a right of appeal) but still want to have their choice of counsel represent them before an international panel seated in Asia. 

Ultimately, the success of the SICC will be measured by the demand for its services, which will be driven by parties putting SICC clauses in their agreements. With the first cases (transferred from the High Court) working their way through the system, and with a number of unanswered questions, most end-users (and their counsel) are adopting a “wait and see” approach. 

Looking Forward

As regards upcoming developments, the SIAC is currently revising its arbitration rules to implement changes to provisions on consolidation and joinder, emergency arbitrators and expedited procedures and investment arbitration, with the revised rules to be released in mid-2016.28

In addition, Hong Kong’s Law Reform Commission, recently recommended, in a report published on October 19, 2015, that Hong Kong amend its laws to expressly permit third party funding of arbitration, and develop appropriate ethical and financial standards for funders.29 In Singapore, the government consulted on this issue in 2011, but declined to amend the International Arbitration Act in 2012 to permit third party funding in arbitration.30 However, it remains a recurring topic of debate, particularly since many other leading dispute resolution centres permit some form of third party funding.31 If Hong Kong follows through with the Law Reform Commission’s proposals, we would expect that Singapore will not be too far behind.

1  See, for example, the recent amendments to the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act (by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance of October 23, 2015); Myanmar’s accession to the New York Convention on July 15, 2013, and draft arbitration bill (published on May 25, 2014); the revised CIETAC Rules 2015; and the opening of the KLRCA’s new premises on November 4, 2014.

2  Queen Mary School of International Arbitration and White & Case, “2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration”, pp. 12, 15-16.

3  Queen Mary School of International Arbitration and White & Case, “2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration”, pp. 17, 20-21.

4  See www.siac.org.sg and www.hkiac.org.

5  SIAC Rules (2013), Rule 26.2 and Schedule 1.

6  HKIAC Rules (2013), Article 23.1 and Schedule 4.

7  2015 Statistics, available at www.siac.org.sg.

8  SIAC, “The Emergency Arbitrator and Expedited Procedure in SIAC: A New Direction for Arbitration in Asia”, available at www.siac.org.sg.

9  See, e.g., the decision of the Bombay High Court in HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd v Avitel Post Studioz Ltd and others, Arbitration Petition No. 1062/2012, High Court of Bombay, India, January 22, 2014 (ordering relief in terms similar to those in the emergency arbitrator award).

10  SIAC Rules (2013), Rule 5.1.

11  HKIAC Rules (2013), Article 41.

12  2015 Statistics, available at www.siac.org.sg.

13  AQZ v ARA [2015] SGHC 49.

14  See www.siac.org.sg/model-clauses/expedited-procedure-model-clause.

15  HKIAC, “Guidelines on the Use of a Secretary to the Arbitral Tribunal”, effective June 1, 2014, available at www.hkiac.org.

16  SIAC, “Practice Note for Administered Cases – On the Appointment of Administrative Secretaries’, February 2, 2015, available at www.siac.org.sg.

17  For instance, the SIAC offers scrutiny of awards before they are issued (like the ICC); the HKIAC does not, preferring a “light touch” approach. The HKIAC rules contain provisions for consolidation of pending arbitrations; the SIAC rules do not. The Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance expressly provides for ex parte interim relief (based on the 2006 revisions to the UNCITRAL Model Law); the Singapore International Arbitration Act does not.

18  See www.sicc.gov.sg (noting that “the SICC serves as a companion rather than a competitor to arbitration”). See also Keynote speech by Senior Minister of State for Law, Indranee Rajah SC, at the CIArb-WIPO-SIAC IP Media and Technology Arbitration Symposium, March 13, 2014, available at www.mlaw.gov.sg/news/speeches/sms_-keynote-speech-for-ciarb-wipo-siac-ip-media-and-technology-.html (“The idea is to enable Singapore to provide users with the entire suite of dispute resolution services to choose from, depending on their needs.”).

19  International Research Corp PLC v. Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and anor [2013] SGCA 55.

20  See www.simc.com.sg and www.siac.org.sg.

21  BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd v PT Bayan Resources TBK (SIC/S 1/2015).

22  See www.sicc.gov.sg/Judges.aspx?id=30 for the full list.

23  SICC Practice Directions, ss. 23-24.

24  Singapore Rules of Court, Ord. 110, r. 25.

25  Singapore Rules of Court, Ord. 110, r. 30.

26  Hague Convention of June 30, 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, Article 8.

27  See www.sicc.gov.sg/documents/docs/SICC_Model_Clauses.pdf.

28  SIAC, “SIAC Announces Commencement of Revisions for SIAC Arbitration Rules”, www.siac.org.sg.

29  It is currently unclear whether the common law doctrines of champerty and maintenance, which apply to litigation, also apply to prohibit third party funding for arbitration in Hong Kong. See Unruh v Seeberger (2007) 10 HKCFAR 31.

30  See www.mlaw.gov.sg/content/dam/minlaw/corp/assets/documents/linkclickf651.pdf. In Singapore, the common law doctrine of champerty has been expressly extended to third party funding in arbitration. See Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd v Clough Engineering Ltd and another [2007] 1 SLR(R) 989.

31  See, e.g., Global Arbitration Review, “Singapore at 50: What prospects for third-party funding?”, August 21, 2015


Simon Dunbar
+65 6303 6008
View Profile »


Jia Lin Hoe
+65 6303 6027 
View Profile »


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.