Do Your Employees Have the Proper Legal Training When It Comes to Government Investigations or Inquiries?

by Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP

There is a general understanding that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives a person the right not to incriminate him- or herself, and that understanding comes, in large measure, from movies and television programs showing police officers reading suspects their Miranda rights. What gets lost in the drama of these shows is that that right is not absolute. It only attaches when one is a suspect and does not apply to corporations, only individuals.

On June 17, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Salinas vs. Texas, No. 12-246, 2-13 BL 158572 (U.S., June 17, 2013). What the court held is that, if someone voluntarily speaks with the police and sits mute in the face of a question, the fact of that person’s silence can be used against him or her in a subsequent prosecution. In that case. Mr. Salinas agreed to accompany the police to their station in order to answer questions. As is typical, the police advised they wanted to ask those questions in order to clear him of potential charges – a statement that itself should have served as a red flag to Mr. Salinas. This was a noncustodial situation, meaning Mr. Salinas was free to leave at any time, so the Miranda warnings were not given and did not apply.

During the course of the interview, and after answering a number of other questions, Mr. Salinas was asked whether his shotgun “would match the shells recovered at the scene of the murder.” In response, Mr. Salinas “[l]ooked down at the floor, shuffled his feet, bit his bottom lip, cl[e]nched his hands in his lap, [and] began to tighten up.” After sitting silent for about two (2) minutes, subsequent questions were asked and answered. Mr. Salinas was later arrested for the murders and convicted. On appeal, he argued that the prosecutor commented on his silence during closing argument and that is not permitted as his silence was used against him.

The Supreme Court held that, in order to assert the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, the claim must be affirmatively made. While exactly what Mr. Salinas needed to say in order to make clear he was invoking his right was never clarified, but the Supreme Court did hold that silence alone was not enough.

The Supreme Court also made clear that, if Mr. Salinas was in custody and had been given his Miranda rights, the decision might have been different since silence is permitted in such a circumstance, but here, the interview was noncustodial.

This case serves as a reminder to companies of the importance of explaining legal rights to more than just managers, directors, and executives. A typical way in which government agents interview employees follows execution of a search warrant. The agents have identified the relevant employees during the warrant execution process, generally have had preliminary conversations with them, and now want to follow up and get more information. Another example of how such interaction arises is when the agents are investigating a matter and simply contact employees, often at home. A common approach is for the agents to say they just have a few questions and want to clear up some issues. Another common method is to say, we aren’t really after you; we want your bosses and if you cooperate with us, nothing will happen to you. All of these statements should serve as red flags to employees, regardless of their position in the company. For companies, no matter how good their internal controls, mistakes do happen.

Compounding the situation is investigators will often express veiled threats about the employee’s immigration status or otherwise conduct the interview in such a manner as to intimidate the employee and then use that person’s fears to their advantage in building the case against the company and the individuals. While these are permissible interrogation techniques, they do leave companies vulnerable, and so it would be wise for businesses of all sizes to make sure they give proper training to all staff members (from top to bottom) about their legal rights. Obviously, the size of the company makes that task easier or more difficult in direct relation to the number of employees and the different locations in which the company operates. Further complicating matters is when the company has locations in multiple countries as local laws differ.

This training would be expected to make clear to employees of the American company, they have the right to decline to speak with investigators, whether arrested or interrogated, or even to meet freely. If they elect to speak with investigators, the company will also want to emphasize any information the employee shares must be accurate. To do otherwise creates other potential liabilities. How the subject of legal rights and how to invoke them is worked into the training tools the company makes available to its employees will need to be stylized to the individual audience, but in light of the holding in Salinas, companies would be wise to consider how best to protect themselves and their employees as so many of the mistakes being made are now being investigated first as criminal prosecutions, and only later do the authorities settle for civil consequences.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.