DOJ Signals Deprioritization of Federal Cannabis Policy

ArentFox Schiff
Contact

ArentFox Schiff

On September 8, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the withdrawal of dozens of pending rulemaking actions, including two related to the cannabis industry.

Though this recent development is consistent with the federal government’s deregulatory initiatives — such as those under Executive Orders (EOs) Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation and Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory Initiative — it may also signal the DOJ’s deprioritization of cannabis-related rulemaking and policy development.

Effective September 11, 16 proposed rulemaking actions included in the Federal Register and the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda were officially withdrawn from consideration by the US Drug Enforcement Administration. This move is part of a broader deregulatory initiative under various EOs issued earlier this year. Among other things, the EOs require executive agencies repeal at least 10 existing regulations for every new regulation proposed, evaluate all potential new regulations, and develop a Unified Regulatory Agenda that seeks to rescind or modify any regulations that potentially constitute “federal overreach.” In response, the DOJ conducted a comprehensive review of proposed rules and identified those it considered not in alignment with the agency’s priorities and objectives. Among the withdrawn rules are two related to the cannabis industry.

The first EO, titled Analytical Labs and Hemp, aimed to address regulatory burdens created by the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, which created the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Domestic Hemp Production Program and set requirements for labs conducting analytical testing of THC concentration levels. Under Section 990.27, plants over 0.3% THC are treated as Schedule I Controlled Substances, requiring labs to remediate or dispose of the non-compliant plants and submit documentation to the USDA verifying such remediation and disposal. The withdrawn rule would have reduced these burdens on testing labs.

The second, titled Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion, sought to limit restrictions governing medical research involving cannabis under the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion Act passed in 2022.

While this development aligns with the current Administration’s deregulatory agenda, it may also signal that cannabis policy is a low priority.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© ArentFox Schiff

Written by:

ArentFox Schiff
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

ArentFox Schiff on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide