Double-Take: Nationwide Preliminary Injunction of EO 14042 Limited to “Vaccine Mandate” Only

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Morrison & Foerster LLP

On Friday afternoon, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, which had earlier issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against Executive Order 14042’s vaccine mandate, made clear that the injunction applies only to the vaccine mandate and not to other COVID-related requirements. (We previously reported on the nationwide injunction.)  The order came in response to the federal government’s motion to clarify the following: 

Defendants request clarification of whether the preliminary injunction is limited to enforcement of the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force’s vaccination requirements, of whether it also prevents federal agencies from enforcing requirements related to masking and physical distancing and the identification of a person or persons to coordinate COVID-19 workplace safety efforts at covered contractor workplaces.[1]

In response, the court held that the nationwide preliminary injunction applied only to the vaccine mandate, a limitation it deemed “evident from the language the Court used—as well as the language the Court noticeably did not use—in issuing the injunction” (emphasis in original). The court further noted that its “Order on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction did not reference, discuss, or analyze any of the other COVID-19 safety‑related requirements.”[2] The court’s order on Friday does not explain why its finding that the government lacked statutory authority to enforce the vaccine mandate does not also extend to the other requirements. In any event, the important point for now is that those requirements are not covered by the court’s nationwide preliminary injunction.

Contractors performing work in states covered by one of the other (statewide) preliminary injunctions, however, should closely review the language of those orders to confirm the scope of their compliance obligations. Contractors performing work outside those states must comply with the balance of Executive Order 14042 and its implementing guidance, including the testing, masking, and social distancing requirements provided in the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force Guidance, FAQs, and agency implementing memoranda. 

Contractors unsure of their obligations should reach out to counsel or their cognizant contracting officer for additional clarification.


[1] Defs.’ Emergency Mot. for Stay Pending Appeal and for Immediate Administrative Stay at 12, State of Ga., et al. v. President of the U.S., et al., No. 21-163 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2021), ECF No. 97.

[2] Order at 4, State of Ga., et al. v. President of the U.S., et al., No. 21-163 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 21, 2022), ECF No. 112.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.