EEOC Sues Impressions Incorporated for Disability Discrimination

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Federal Agency Says St. Paul Company Fired Employee for Depression Despite His Submitting to Unlawfully Mandated Examination           

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. - Impressions, Incorporated, a St. Paul-based design, printing and packaging company, violated federal law by requiring unlawful medical exams and then firing an employee because of his disability, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed this week.

According to Julianne Bowman, District Director for the EEOC's Chicago District office, who super­vised the investigation preceding the lawsuit, Justin Cadmus had worked for ten years as a press helper for Impressions Incorporated and was rated a top performer.  In 2014, Cadmus was diagnosed by his family doctor with depression.  His supervisor became aware that he had ceased taking medication for the depression, and, in April 2015, told him to see a doctor and then to see a psychologist, and to go back on medication.  Although Cadmus complied with these unlawful directives which were not justified by business necessity, he was fired because of his depression.

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimin­ation on the basis of disability, which can include requiring unnecessary medical examinations and firing an employee because of his disability. The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settle­ment through its conciliation process. The case, EEOC v. Impressions Incorporated, Civil Action No. 0:17-cv-01466-PAM-SER, was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, and was assigned to U.S. District Judge Paul A. Magnuson. The government's litigation effort will be led by Trial Attorney Patrick Connor and supervised by EEOC Associ­ate Regional Attorney Jean P. Kamp.

"Employers cannot require employees to have unnecessary medical and psychological examinations or require the employee to obtain prescription drugs as a condition of continued employment," said Greg Gochanour, the regional attorney for the EEOC's Chicago District Office. "Mr. Cadmus should not have been asked to take the two examinations in the first place, but he did so, and yet he was fired anyway. This com­pany's behavior was inexcusably callous as well as unlawful, and the EEOC is here to combat such unfair conduct."

The EEOC's Minneapolis Area Office is part of the Chicago District, which is responsible for handling charges of employment discrimin­ation, administrative enforcement and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis.

The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at  Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.