Electronic Health Records (EHR) were generally promised to decrease costs and improve health-care outcomes. Setting aside whether those promises were well founded, EHR have posed new challenges for litigators. What makes sense in a clinical setting may not in a courtroom. What may be critically important in a medical malpractice action might be of no consequence or importance in a patient's treatment.
Originally published in Virginia Lawyer Magazine in June 2015.
Please see full publication below for more information.