Eighth Circuit Holds Nonoperating Working Interest Owner and Engineering Contractor Not Liable For Negligence of On-Site ‘Company Hand’

by BakerHostetler

On Aug. 5, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of a nonoperating working interest owner, Oasis, and its engineering subcontractor, RPM Consulting, holding that neither owed a duty of care to an employee of a drilling rig operator. North Dakota, like Texas and other states, follows Section 414 of the Restatement of Torts for determining liability for acts of independent contractors.

Oasis is an oil and gas exploration company that contracts with other entities to manage the day-to-day operations at its wells. It does not conduct drilling operations at its well sites; instead, it has a Master Service Contract with RPM Consulting to provide engineering support and subcontractors to oversee the drilling process and coordinate services needed to keep the sites operating efficiently.

In early 2011, Oasis obtained the rights to drill for oil at the Ross 5603 well in Williams County, North Dakota. Oasis engaged Nabors Drilling to drill the well and provide the rig and labor. RPM Consulting assigned Michael Bader as company hand to the rig. Bader, through the separate entity of Mike Bader Consulting LLC, had entered into a subcontractor agreement with RPM Consulting. The role of a company hand in this instance was to ensure that the drilling progressed safely, efficiently and according to plan. The company hand did not operate equipment or perform hands-on work but rather supervised drilling and contracts with third-party vendors for needed services. The company hand lived at the site, served as the Oasis representative at the well and emailed progress reports to Oasis and RPM Consulting each morning.

Joseph Kronberg worked for Nabors Drilling on Nabors Rig 177 and was electrocuted by a punctured and submerged electrical cord while exiting the Ross well’s “change shack.” Mr. Kronberg’s widow brought wrongful death and survival actions against Oasis and RPM Consulting, among others, alleging defendants’ negligence caused her husband’s death. The district court granted summary judgment for Oasis and RPM Consulting, ruling that neither company owed Mr. Kronberg a duty of care under North Dakota law. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed.

Mrs. Kronberg argued that Bader, the company hand, was an employee of Oasis and RPM Consulting, and that the companies were vicariously liable to persons injured because of Bader’s alleged negligence. As evidence, Mrs. Kronberg showed: (1) Bader was Oasis’s lone representative at the well, and he was required to complete an accident report about Mr. Kronberg’s death on an Oasis company form; (2) the RPM Consulting-Bader contract required Bader to complete his work personally; (3) RPM Consulting assigned Bader to a specific rig; (4) RPM Consulting provided Bader with documents; (5) Bader emailed RPM Consulting employees often; (6) Bader sent daily progress reports to RPM Consulting employees; (7) RPM Consulting furnished equipment, such as a computer, along with an email address and computer files for Bader’s use; and (8) Bader was paid based on the number of days he worked and on a regular basis. The court held these circumstances were insufficient to support a finding that the companies directed the means and manner of Bader’s work. The record established Bader was an independent contractor and not an employee of Oasis or RPM Consulting.

Alternatively, Mrs. Kronberg argued that the companies may be liable under the doctrine of retained control found in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 414 (1965), which imposes liability on a company that treats an independent contractor like an employee by controlling the “method, manner, and operative detail” of a specific portion of the contractor’s work. By retaining control, the companies may be liable directly for the negligence of the contractor if it fails to exercise its control with reasonable care. The court noted that companies concerned with only the finished results of the contractor’s work are not liable.

As evidence that Oasis retained control, Mrs. Kronberg asserted that Oasis controlled Bader by mandating that he select third-party vendors from a vendor list that Oasis provided. Mrs. Kronberg also cited Oasis’s control over the land where the Ross well was located. The court affirmed that this evidence does not demonstrate Oasis controlled the “operative details” of Bader’s work for purposes of retained-control liability.

For retained control by RPM Consulting, Mrs. Kronberg relied principally on the subcontract, which provided that Bader must “comply with standard safety practices, any OSHA requirements applicable to [his] work and any safety practices required by RPM and/or RPM’s customers.” The court noted, however, that the contract also states that RPM Consulting “shall have no direction or control” of Bader.

Mrs. Kronberg also argued RPM Consulting exercised actual control of safety practices by offering safety training to company hands. RPM Consulting, however, did not require company hands to complete the training, and it was undisputed that RPM Consulting had no safety requirements in place at the time of Mr. Kronberg’s death. The court held there was no genuine issue of material fact as to Oasis’ or RPM Consulting’s lack of control over Bader’s safety practices, and neither company owed a duty to Mr. Kronberg under the doctrine of retained control. Thus, neither company may be held liable for Bader’s alleged negligence as a company hand. Summary judgment affirmed. Kronberg v. Oasis Petroleum N. Am., LLC, 831 F.3d 1043 (8th Cir. 2016).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.