Employment Law Update: The EEOC Revokes Its Guidance on Transgender Protections Under Title VII

Whiteford
Contact

Whiteford

At a public meeting on January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted to rescind its Biden-era harassment guidance (the Guidance) that identified persistent misgendering and/or limiting restroom access by gender identity as potential violations of Title VII. This decision to revoke has drawn significant public attention and debate.

The 2–1 vote (with a Democratic Commissioner dissenting) latched onto a 2025 Texas federal court ruling that had already struck portions of the Guidance related to transgender employees. This action reflects the Trump administration’s narrower reading of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County decision compared to the prior administration, even as Bostock still recognizes that Title VII bars discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.

What changes, and what does not? The EEOC’s leadership emphasized that rescinding the Guidance does not halt anti-harassment enforcement; the agency stated it will continue investigating and litigating harassment cases notwithstanding the document’s withdrawal. Advocates for keeping the Guidance argued that it captured real-world examples, best practices, and emerging issues, such as online harassment, with footnotes tying examples to case law. They also noted that the guidance “uplifts” marginalized workers and tracks developments, like Bostock. Notably, the rescission occurred without a notice-and-comment period, despite a motion to delay for public input that did not pass.

For employers, the practical takeaway is continuity of risk amid policy flux. Even without the Guidance on the books, the underlying anti-discrimination protections recognized by courts remain in effect, and of course, state and local laws may provide such protections regardless. While the agency has withdrawn this specific guidance document, Bostock and related Title VII principles govern, and businesses should maintain robust, evenhanded anti-harassment and anti-discrimination programs that address gender identity and sexual orientation.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Whiteford

Written by:

Whiteford
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Whiteford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide