Enforcement Of Non-Competition Agreements Under Florida Law

Cole Schotz
Contact

Non-competition agreements—or non-competes as they are routinely referred to—are common and are regularly enforced and upheld by Florida courts.  A non-compete is designed to limit what an employee can or cannot do both while employed by a business and after the employment relationship ends although non-competes can apply to persons other than those merely defined as employees.

In a nutshell and in its most basic form, a non-compete prevents an employee of a business from working for a competitor of  his employer both during the time he is employed by that employer and for a certain period of time after the employment ends.  Florida Statutes Sec. 542.335 governs non-competes in Florida that were entered into after July 1, 1996.  Amongst other things, it requires that the non-compete be in writing and signed by the person to whom the non-compete applies and that there be a legitimate business reason for the non-compete.  Legitimate business reasons, under Sec. 542.335, include but are not limited to trade secrets defined in Florida Statutes Sec. 688.002(4); customer or client goodwill; substantial relationships with  specific customers, whether those customers are existing or even prospective; and valuable confidential business information that does not necessarily rise to the level of being a trade secret.

If a court finds that a non-compete is not supported by a legitimate business interest that non-compete will be deemed unlawful.  Simply put, under those circumstances, the non-compete is void and unenforceable

Whether the period of time that a person is prohibited from competing, after the employment or business relationship ends, is ultimately considered reasonable depends upon the nature of that relationship.  Florida Statutes Sec. 542.335 provides for the following presumptively reasonable periods:

  • when the non-compete is against a former employer, agent or independent contractor and is not part of the sale of a business, the court presumes that a restrictive period of six months or less is reasonable and a period of more than two years is unreasonable;
  • when the non-compete is against a former distributor, franchisee, dealer or licensee of either a trademark or service mark and that is also not part of the sale of a business, the court presumes that a restrictive period of one year or less is reasonable and a period of more than three years is unreasonable;
  • when the non-compete is against the seller of all or part of a business, the court presumes that a restrictive period of three years or less is reasonable and a period of more than seven years is unreasonable.

The presumptions laid out in Florida Statutes Sec. 542.335 are rebuttable presumptions.

This means that the person subject to the non-compete can bring forward evidence as to why the restrictive period should not be enforced even if that restrictive period falls within the confines of Sec. 542.335.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cole Schotz | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cole Schotz
Contact
more
less

Cole Schotz on:

Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.