Environmental Alert: "Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Causation Standard in Multiple Source Toxic Tort Cases"

by Porter Hedges LLP

The Texas Supreme Court took what appears to be a middle ground in toxic tort cases involving exposure to the same substance from multiple sources. The Court rejected the “but for” standard advocated by the defendant, but also rejected the plaintiff’s argument that proof of any exposure could support a jury finding of causation. On July 11, 2014, the Court issued Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, approving a lower court determination that Bostic had not proved causation, and that Georgia-Pacific should pay nothing.

Bostic suffered from mesothelioma, a rare cancer linked to asbestos exposure. He had sued 40 companies, claiming they were all, at least in part, responsible for his injuries. At trial, the jury found that Georgia-Pacific and one other company caused the injuries, and assessed millions in dollars in damages against Georgia-Pacific.

On appeal, Georgia-Pacific argued that Bostic presented no evidence that, but for exposure to Georgia-Pacific’s products, Bostic would not have developed mesothelioma. Bostic countered that he did not need to meet the “but for” test in this multiple source exposure case; Bostic argued that he must only show some exposure to asbestos from Georgia-Pacific.

The Texas Supreme Court held that neither position described Texas law. Rather, the Court held that, when exposure came from multiple sources, the plaintiff must prove “substantial factor causation” as to each defendant. “Substantial factor causation” requires more proof than just proof of any exposure, but does not require the plaintiff to meet a “but for” test.  The Court ruled that Bostic's evidence did not establish "substantial factor causation."

According to the Court, in order to meet the “substantial factor causation” requirement as to a specific defendant, the plaintiff must: present reasonably quantified exposure evidence (although mathematical precision is not required) as to the defendant’s product and as to the other sources; must prove that the exposure from the defendant’s product, alone, more than doubled the plaintiff’s risk of contracting the disease; and must establish that reasonable persons could regard the defendant’s product as a cause of the disease, in light of the evidence of the plaintiff’s total exposure.

The Court’s decision appears to leave a few significant remaining questions. Trial judges, experts and litigants may be unsure as to how far below “mathematical precision” evidence can be and still constitute reasonably quantified exposure evidence. They will also have doubts as to what relative levels of exposure from a specific product, compared with total exposure, will suffice. The Court mentions the possibility of exposure to one product that more than doubles the risk of disease, compared to another that increased the risk by a factor of 10,000. However, the Court does not indicate if this will or will not be adequate to support causation, only that juries or judges should be able to consider this circumstance.

Three justices dissented, arguing that Bostic’s evidence of “significant” exposures should be sufficient to support the jury’s finding, even without a more quantified exposure estimate. Another justice agreed with the majority’s ultimate ruling for Georgia-Pacific, but wrote separately because of concerns that the Court’s discussion of how epidemiological evidence can prove causation could have the practical effect of increasing the plaintiff’s burden of proof.

For the Court’s page where you can download the majority, concurring and dissenting opinions, click here.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Porter Hedges LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Porter Hedges LLP

Porter Hedges LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.