EPA Proposes Significant Narrowing of PFAS Reporting Rule Under TSCA

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact

McGlinchey Stafford

On November 10, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a pre-publication version of a proposed rule that would substantially narrow the scope of PFAS reporting obligations under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Notably, this proposal includes an exemption for imported articles, a major shift from the original 2023 rule. The public will have 45 days to comment once the rule is officially published in the Federal Register.

Background: Original TSCA PFAS Reporting Rule


Finalized in October 2023, the original rule required manufacturers and importers of PFAS and PFAS-containing articles to report detailed data on activities dating back to January 1, 2011. Importantly, the rule lacked standard TSCA exemptions, drawing widespread concern for creating excessive compliance burdens—particularly on companies importing finished products containing trace levels of PFAS.

Key Proposed Exemptions


EPA now proposes to ease compliance by incorporating traditional exemptions found in other TSCA rules. Proposed exemptions include:

  1. PFAS imported as part of an article
  2. PFAS present in mixtures or articles below 0.1% (de minimis)
  3. PFAS present as impurities
  4. Byproduct PFAS not used for commercial purposes, including those formed incidentally during end-use or exposure
  5. Non-isolated intermediates
  6. PFAS used in small quantities for R&D

Additionally, EPA is requesting feedback on whether to add a production volume threshold—mirroring the 25,000 lbs (or 2,500 lbs) exemption in the TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

Revised Reporting Timeline


EPA is proposing to shift the reporting window from the originally scheduled April 13 – October 13, 2026 period. Under the new timeline:

  • Reporting will begin 60 days after the effective date of the final rule.
  • The submission window will last for three months, not six.

The EPA cited the need for additional time to develop and test the electronic reporting software (Central Data Exchange, or CDX) and to potentially incorporate changes based on industry feedback and a recent Executive Order to reduce regulatory burdens.

Key Provisions Unchanged


Several core aspects of the 2023 rule remain intact:

  • The reporting lookback period remains January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2022.
  • The PFAS definition is unchanged. Below are the generic chemical formulas used by regulatory bodies upon which EPA relies to define broad categories of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) based on their core structures.
    • R-(CF₂)-CF(R’)R”
    • R-CF₂OCF₂-R’
    • CF₃C(CF₃)R’-R”
  • The “known to or reasonably ascertainable by” standard for due diligence continues to apply.
  • EPA is, however, seeking comment on whether to limit reportable PFAS to those with CASRN, TSCA Accession Number, or LVE numbers.

Policy Rationale


According to EPA, the goal of this proposal is to make the rule more implementable, reduce duplicative and unnecessary reporting, and align with Congressional intent. Administrator Lee Zeldin emphasized that the initial rule risked imposing nearly $1 billion in compliance costs, labeling it a “crushing regulatory burden,” especially for small businesses. In contrast, the proposed revisions aim to preserve critical data collection without overburdening the regulated community.

What Should Businesses Do?


EPA is explicitly inviting comment on all aspects of the proposed changes, particularly:

  • the newly proposed exemptions,
  • the revised submission period, and
  • the possibility of a production volume threshold.

Stakeholders—especially importers, manufacturers, and those involved in supply chain compliance—should strongly consider submitting comments during the upcoming 45-day public comment period.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McGlinchey Stafford

Written by:

McGlinchey Stafford
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

McGlinchey Stafford on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide