European Commission paper on Brexit and IP

by Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells

The European Commission has released a position paper on “Intellectual property rights (including geographical indications)” giving us the first indication of how the Commission will approach the Brexit negotiations with the UK regarding Intellectual Property Rights (“IPR“).

The Commission has set up a Taskforce on Article 50 negotiations with the United Kingdom to prepare the Brexit talks. This task force is currently drawing up a number of position papers to be submitted to the 27 remaining Member States. Those papers are intended to develop opinion amongst the 27 remaining Member States as well as ultimately set out the EU’s position versus the UK. The paper is only five pages long, setting out some general principles which the Commission views as key to the future of IPR in the UK and EU27 post-Brexit.

The paper suggests that the Commission favours continuity of existing protection whereby IPRs are automatically ‘divided’ to grant separate protection as UK rights, with the same benefits as their ‘parent’ EU right, with minimum cost to IP owners. CITMA has commented:

This European Commission paper in many respects mirrors CITMA’s position paper and is a positive step towards ensuring current EU registered trade mark and design rights continue to cover and be enforceable in the UK post-Brexit, with minimum cost to IP owners.

The paper covers all IPR with “unitary character within the Union” (“Unitary IPR“) including:

  • European trade marks;
  • Registered community designs;
  • Unregistered community designs; and
  • Protected geographical indications/protected designations of origin/plant varieties;

The paper also touches on database rights and supplementary protection certificates.

The general principles set out in the paper are as follows:

Unitary IPR

The holder of any Unitary IPR before Brexit should, after Brexit, automatically be the holder of a new corresponding UK right – if need be, on the basis of specific domestic legislation to be introduced in the UK

This would address maintaining the renewal dates, priority dates, seniority principles, genuine use and reputation requirements.

It would require adaptation of the ‘genuine use’ requirements so that use in the EU prior to the withdrawal date is recognised as ‘genuine use’ for the purposes of the new corresponding UK registration. It would also require adaptation of the ‘reputation’ requirement so that where the EUTM from which the UK registration is derived, pre-Brexit, had a reputation within the EU this reputation would be recognised “temporarily” in the UK, even where the corresponding UK registration does not yet have a UK-specific reputation.

The Commission makes clear that the implementation of this automatic division should not result in financial costs for the holder of Unitary IPR and administrative burdens should be kept to a minimum.

Applications for Unitary IPRs submitted before, and still on-going, as at the withdrawal date should be allowed to keep any priority date when applying for a UK right after withdrawal. The Commission does not make clear whether they intend this to be automatic or at the option of the applicant.


The Commission proposes that all IPRs exhausted in the EU pre-Brexit (as determined under Union law) should remain exhausted in both the EU27 and the UK post-Brexit, irrespective of any changes made in the exhaustion regime in either the UK or EU27 post-Brexit.

Geographical Indications (GI) and Protected Designations of Origin (PDO)

The UK should put in place, as of the withdrawal date, the necessary domestic legislation providing for the continued protection of geographical indications and protected designations of origin comparable to that provided by Union law. The UK currently has no domestic legislation in relation to GIs or PDOs.


Databases protected under Union law before Brexit should continue to enjoy protection after Brexit in the EU27 Member States and in the UK. (Unless UK law is amended, the protection granted to databases under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended by the Database Directive, would continue to apply)

Supplementary Protection Certificates (“SPCs”)

Applications for SPCs or for an extension of their duration, in the UK, submitted before withdrawal should be completed in accordance with Union law and any certificate granted (or extended) should provide for protection equivalent to that provided by Union law.


This position paper outlines an approach that will be welcomed by holders of EU IPR, aimed as it is at providing continuity and minimising costs. However, there are some potential issues with this approach.

The Commission’s suggestion that the post-Brexit arrangement should result in no financial cost for the existing EU IPR holders seems to indicate that it wants the UK government to foot the bill. The number of registrations at the UKIPO will rise dramatically with the potential for a large number of UK registrations which are never intended to be used in the UK.

The paper deals only with IPR in existence as at the time of the UK withdrawal and many long-term issues would remain to be decided. Issues such as extended protection so UK businesses can continue to benefit from a unitary IP right in Europe; whether use in the UK will allow a right holder to maintain an EU27 registration post division when the only use made of the sign is in the UK; and how will the UK bona fide “intent to use” requirement be applied to marks that have been derived from an existing EUTM and automatically registered at the UKIPO? (The EUIPO has no ‘bona fide intent to use’ requirements)

The paper also fails to address the ability of UK Chartered Trade Mark Attorneys or UK qualified lawyers to represent clients before the EUIPO and the EU General Court, which is a matter of some concern to them

Although the Commission has indicated that the status quo in terms of exhaustion of IPR should be maintained post-Brexit for goods already on the market pre-Brexit, in practice, the difficult question will be determining which rules of exhaustion will apply as it is fundamentally a political issue. It will be necessary to provide for explicit exemptions, for example where a trade mark right is exhausted when the product carrying the mark is put on the UK market and thereafter shipped into the Internal Market. Under “normal” circumstances the effect would be different when a product hits a domestic market outside the EU/EEA. The paper also does not indicate how the Commission will approach negotiations in relation to exhaustion of rights going forward.

The protection of GIs and PDOs appears to be a significant concern for the EU Commission. As the legislation currently in effect in the UK in relation to GIs and PDOs is solely EU legislation, unless specific UK legislation is enacted post-Brexit, the valuable protection of EU geographically sensitive food and drink products will be lost.  This would enable UK businesses to call English sparkling wine ‘champagne’ and ham ‘Parma’.  Although protection for GIs and PDOs that benefit UK products (such as Cumberland Sausage, Cornish clotted cream and Scotch whisky) would also be lost, there are far more EU GIs and PDOs so the impact on the EU would be far greater. This issue may be a good ‘bargaining chip’ for the UK in any negotiations.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.