Expansion of California’s Unfair Competition Law

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact

In yet another expansion of California’s unfair competition law, the California Supreme Court recently ruled that state law claimants may base a cause of action on a “borrowed” federal statute even though the U.S. Congress had repealed that federal statute’s private enforcement provision. In Rose v. Bank of America N.A., 57 Cal. 4th 390 (2013), the Court reversed the lower courts on the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s claim, holding that Congress’ failure to remove a savings clause from the underlying federal law, the Truth in Savings Act (“TISA,” 12 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. at § 4312), left open the ability for plaintiffs to bring a state law claim based on a violation of TISA.

Plaintiffs in Rose brought a class action suit against Bank of America, asserting that certain violations of TISA’s disclosure requirements relating to fee increases on personal bank accounts constituted unlawful and unfair business practices under California’s unfair competition law (“UCL” Calif. Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.). Under settled California law, violation of federal statues may constitute an “unlawful” act for purposes of the UCL, even where the underlying federal statute does not itself contain a private enforcement mechanism. See, e.g., In re Farm Raised Salmon Cases, 42 Cal. 4th 1077, 1095-96 (2008) (permitting UCL claim based on violations of California statutes that mirror requirements from the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.)).

To date, the major limitation on the UCL’s “borrowing” of federal statutes is where the federal statute purports to provide an exclusive remedy or where Congress intended the federal statute to preempt any related state laws. See Safeco Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 265 Cal. Rptr. 585 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990). When enacted, TISA included a provision authorizing private civil actions. 12 U.S.C. § 4310. However, Congress repealed that provision in 1996 by adding a “sunset clause” to the private action provision, effective 2001. (Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 104-208, § 2604(a) (Sept. 30, 1996), 110 Stat. 3009-470).

The question posed by the Rose case was whether Congress’ repeal of TISA’s private right of action would impact the UCL’s ability to “borrow” TISA violations. In the trial court, defendant successfully demurred to the Rose plaintiffs’ complaint, arguing that Congress’ action demonstrated a desire to eliminate any private right of action under TISA, and that TISA therefore constituted an exclusive federal scheme. 57 Cal. 4th at 394. The Court of Appeal, Second District, affirmed the demurrer, reasoning that Congress’ repeal of TISA’s private right of action was an express rejection of any private right to enforce TISA. Rose v. Bank of America, N.A., 133 Cal. Rptr. 3d 615, 624 (Cal. Ct App. 2011).

The California Supreme Court granted petition for review, and reversed. In discussing its reasoning, the Court noted that the post-repeal TISA retains a separate savings clause which states that TISA does “not supersede any provision of the law of any state relating to the disclosure of yields payable or terms for accounts . . . except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with the provisions of this subtitle, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.” 12 U.S.C. § 4312. Neither lower court had addressed the significance of the savings clause, but the Supreme Court suggested that the UCL was exactly the kind of statute contemplated by the savings clause, and that the continued existence of the savings clause, despite Congress’ repeal of the private action provision, indicates that UCL claims may still be based on violations of TISA.

The Court’s holding can also be understood in the context of longstanding California jurisprudence treating the UCL as providing a strong, independent cause of action. Notably, the Court relied upon its own prior analysis in Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 17 Cal. 4th 553 (1998), in which the Court held that a corporation had standing under the UCL to enforce a violation of the California Penal Code related to the prohibition of cigarette sales to minors. Id. at 567. Following this prior guidance, in Rose, the Court repeatedly emphasized the UCL’s force as an independent cause of action and that the pursuit of a claim under the UCL is not the same as “enforcement” of the underlying federal statute. See, e.g., 57 Cal. 4th at 397 (“[B]y borrowing requirements from other statutes, the UCL does not serve as a mere enforcement mechanism. It provides its own distinct and limited equitable remedies for unlawful business practices, using other laws only to define what is ‘unlawful.’”); Id. at 396 (“[A] UCL action does not ‘enforce’ the law on which a claim of unlawful business practice is based. By proscribing ‘any unlawful’ business practice [the UCL] ‘borrows’ violations of other laws and treats them as unlawful practices that the [UCL] makes independently actionable.”) (emphasis in original) (internal citations omitted).

While the Court notes early on that its holding is limited to the unique circumstances of the case (57 Cal. 4th at 395 (“the issue before us is a narrow one”)), the logic of the decision and its discussion of the independence of the UCL suggest that the outcome might have been the same even without the existence of the savings clause, such that the Court may permit UCL “borrowing” from federal statutes whenever there is any ambiguity about Congress’ desire to create exclusive and preemptive federal schemes.

Alternatively, the scope of Rose may truly be quite narrow, permitting UCL claims based on borrowed federal law that precludes private enforcement only where the underlying statute also contains a clause expressly protecting consistent state laws.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact
more
less

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.