Fast Five: Rhode Island Appellate Practice: August 2013

by Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.



In Lombardi v. City of Providence, No. 2012-86-Appeal, the Rhode Island Supreme Court reminded litigants that a party who is not aggrieved by a judgment cannot be qualified as an appellant on appeal. 

In that case, the plaintiff had filed suit against the City of Providence (the “City”), alleging that it negligently failed to maintain or repair a portion of the sidewalk where the plaintiff had fallen.  Id. at 1-2.  The plaintiff later amended her complaint to add the state as a defendant.  Id. at 2.  Importantly, the state never filed a cross-claim against the City.  Id.  The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that it did not owe a duty to the plaintiff because the state, not the city was responsible for maintenance and repair of the sidewalk.  Id.  The state opposed the City’s motion, arguing that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to which entity was responsible for maintenance and repair of the sidewalk.  Id.  The trial court disagreed and entered summary judgment in favor of the City.  Id. at 5.  Final judgment entered in favor of the City on plaintiff’s claims and the state filed an appeal.  Id.

After oral argument on the state’s appeal, the Court ordered the parties to file memoranda addressing whether the state, having chosen not to file a cross-claim against the City, was a party aggrieved by the Superior Court’s judgment.  Id

R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-24-1 sets forth the right of a party to appeal from a final judgment of the Superior Court.  That statute provides, in relevant part, “[a]ny party aggrieved by a final judgment, decree, or order of the [S]uperior [C]ourt may, within the time prescribed by applicable procedural rules, appeal to the [S]upreme [C]ourt.” 

In Lombardi, the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that the rights set forth in R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-24-1 “‘must be read in light of our long-established rule that a person is aggrieved by a judgment when it adversely affects, in a substantial manner, his [or her] personal or property rights.’”  Id. at 6. (quoting Adams v. United Developers, Inc., 397 A.2d 503, 505 (R.I. 1979)).  “‘[A]n aggrieved party is one whose interest in the lower court decision is actual and practical, as opposed to merely theoretical.’”  Id. (quoting Adams, 397 A.2d at 505).  Applying those principles, the Rhode Island Supreme Court concluded that the state was not an aggrieved party because it had not filed a cross-claim against the city. 

Although the plaintiff was a party that was aggrieved by the trial court’s judgment, the plaintiff did not appeal the trial court’s judgment.


In a rare decision, this term the Rhode Island Supreme Court entertained a question certified to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.  See American States Insurance Company v. LaFlam, No. 2012-80-M.P. The last time the Court answered a certified question was more than two years ago.  See In re Tetreault, 11 A.3d 635 (R.I. 2011).

Article I, Rule 6 of the Rhode Island Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure authorizes the Rhode Island Supreme Court to answer questions of law certified to it by the Supreme Court of the United States, a Court of Appeals of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or a United States District Court upon request by those courts.  R.I. Sup. Ct. R. App. P. Art. I, Rule 6.  The question certified must present a question of Rhode Island law “which may be determinative of the cause then pending in the certifying court and as to which it appears to the certifying court there is no controlling precedent in the decisions of [the Rhode Island Supreme] Court.”  Id

In LaFlam, the defendant filed a motion in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island requesting certification of two questions of law.  LaFlam at 3.  The District Court denied the defendant’s motion, concluding that decisions of the Rhode Island Supreme Court were indicative of how it would answer the questions presented in that case.  Id. at 3-4.  On appeal to the First Circuit, the defendant again requested certification of the two questions to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.  Id. at 4.  The First Circuit agreed with the defendant that there was no controlling precedent in Rhode Island that would assist it in answering the questions before it and, therefore, certified the questions to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.


In a decision this term, the Rhode Island Supreme Court reminded practitioners that it may affirm decisions granting summary judgment on grounds other than those relied upon by the motion justice.  See Beauregard v. Gouin, No. 2010-434-Appeal at 10 n.7 (citing Lavoie v. North East Knitting, Inc., 918 A.2d 225, 228 (R.I. 2007)).  In that case, the Court concluded that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant on plaintiff’s claim for slander of title because one of the necessary elements for such a claim was absent.  Id. at 8-9.  On appeal, the plaintiff argued that the trial court also erred with respect to its conclusions on a different element of the slander of title claim.  Id. at 10 n.7.  Having already concluded that one of the necessary elements was absent, the Court affirmed the trial court’s decision on that basis alone and declined to address the plaintiff’s arguments with respect to the other elements of the slander of title claim.  Id.


In addition to the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s ability to affirm a trial court’s grant of summary judgment on grounds other than those relied upon by the trial court, the Court may also affirm a trial court’s rulings on other grounds.  See Meyer v. Meyer, No. 2011-14-Appeal at 16 n.8 (citing In re Last Will and Testament of Quigley, 21 A.3d 393, 401 n.6 (R.I. 2011); Shepard v. Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co., 944 A.2d 167, 170 (R.I. 2008); Ahlburn v. Clark, 728 A.2d 449, 452 (R.I. 1999)).


The Rhode Island Supreme Court “rides the circuit” twice a year, hearing cases in various venues throughout the state.  The tradition of riding the circuit “dates to colonial times when the courts and other bodies of government traveled from town to town, taking the people’s business directly to the people.”  See Office of Community Outreach and Public Relations.  For example, when he was a practicing lawyer, Abraham Lincoln traveled the circuit in the Eighth Judicial Circuit of Illinois.  See John J. Duff, A. Lincoln: Prairie Lawyer 168 (1960).  This term, the Rhode Island Court sat at Exeter-West Greenwich Regional High School.  See Cruz v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp., No. 2012-56-Appeal at 1.



Written by:

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.