FDIC Consumer Compliance Supervisory Highlights Includes Fair Lending Issues

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact

Ballard Spahr LLP

While much attention has been paid to the “new CFPB’s” plans to make fair lending a top priority, the fair lending practices of financial institutions supervised by the federal banking agencies are also likely to face greater scrutiny under the Biden Administration.

In its Consumer Compliance Supervisory Highlights, the FDIC describes several matters involving fair lending that were identified during consumer compliance examinations conducted in 2020 and referred to the DOJ because the FDIC concluded that it had reason to believe that the creditor had engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination.  The matters consist of:

  • A lending program in which the bank was originating unsecured loans thorough third party partners that operated a website through which applicants could apply for a loan directly.  FDIC examiners found that the underwriting criteria included the prohibited bases of age and the receipt of public assistance.
  • The use of credit-scoring models developed by a third party to offer unsecured lines of credit.  One model scored younger applicants more favorably than elderly applicants and also scored applicants less favorably if their application indicated that they were on maternity leave.  Another model assigned less favorable credit scores based on whether the applicant relied on public assistance income as compared to employment income.
  • A policy that provided a different pricing method for married joint applicants than for unmarried joint applicants.  For married applicants, the bank’s policy directed loan officers to use the highest credit score of the twoapplicants to price the loan.  For unmarried applicants, loan officers were directed to use the primarily applicant’s credit score, with the primary applicant considered to be the person listed first on the credit application.  FDIC examiners identified unmarried co-applicants who received less favorable pricing than similarly-situated married applicants because of the bank’s policy.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.