Federal Appeals Court Finds CFPB's Structure Unconstitutional

by Pepper Hamilton LLP

While certainly a big blow to the Bureau, the court’s remedy did not go as far as some CFPB opponents would have liked.

In a blockbuster ruling on October 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau), through which the agency is headed by a single director who is not subject to removal without cause, is unconstitutional. The court also set aside an enforcement action that resulted in a $109 million order against PHH, a non-bank mortgage lender. In its 110-page decision, the court stopped short of shutting down the Bureau and instead provided a more narrow remedy, which includes giving the president the power to remove the Bureau’s director at will and sending the enforcement action back to the CFPB for further review. This much-anticipated ruling represents a major hit to the Bureau.


The CFPB ordered mortgage lender PHH to pay $109 million for allegedly violating the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by accepting kickbacks from mortgage insurers and ultimately raising the cost for home buyers who needed mortgage insurance. The case was first sent to an administrative judge, who found that PHH violated the law and issued an order requiring PHH to disgorge $6.5 million in ill-gotten gains. However, CFPB Director Richard Cordray overturned the administrative judge’s order and instead imposed a $109 million fine on the company. PHH appealed the director’s decision and sought to vacate the order.

Unconstitutional Argument

PHH argued that the CFPB’s status as an independent agency headed by a single director violates Article II of the U.S. Constitution. The court agreed. The court stated that the “overarching constitutional concern with independent agencies is that the agencies are unchecked by the President, the official who is accountable to the people and who is responsible under Article II for the exercise of executive power.”1 The court pointed out that “[n]o head of either an executive agency or an independent agency operates unilaterally without any check on his or her authority. Therefore, no independent agency exercising substantial executive authority has ever been headed by a single person. Until now.”2 As such, the court found that the CFPB’s structure of power that is concentrated in a single person who is unaccountable to the president represents a structure that is unconstitutional.

PHH argued that the constitutional flaw means that the court must shut down the entire agency until Congress, if it chooses, passes new legislation fixing the constitutional flaw. However, the court took a more narrow approach and simply severed the statute’s unconstitutional provision from the statute. That results in the president’s now having the power to remove the director at will and to supervise and direct the director. In doing so, the court allows the CFPB to continue operating and performing its duties, but it must “do so as an executive agency akin to other executive agencies headed by a single person, such as the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury.”3


PHH argued that the CFPB incorrectly interpreted section 8 of RESPA to bar captive reinsurance arrangements involving mortgage lenders such as PHH and their affiliated reinsurers. The court agreed with PHH that captive reinsurance arrangements are allowed under section 8 of RESPA so long as the amount paid by the mortgage insurer for the reinsurance does not exceed the reasonable market value of the reinsurance. The court remanded to the lower court the question of whether the relevant mortgage insurers paid more than reasonable market value to the PHH-affiliated reinsurer.

Due Process and Statute of Limitations

Another key issue raised by PHH was that the CFPB departed from consistent prior interpretations issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and that the CFPB then retroactively applied its new interpretation of RESPA against PHH, thereby violating PHH’s due process rights. The court agreed with PHH and ruled that it violated “bedrock principles of due process.”4

Additionally, the court addressed the question of whether a statute of limitations applied to the CFPB’s enforcement effort. The Bureau has taken the position that, under the Dodd-Frank Act, there are no statutes of limitations for any CFPB administrative actions to enforce any consumer protection law. The court disagreed and held that a three-year limit applies to the enforcement of the alleged kickback violations, which prevents the CFPB from attempting to punish alleged conduct that took place before then.

This ruling is likely to have a significant impact on the way the Bureau approaches enforcement and should end the CFPB’s practice of looking back to seek compensation for transgressions from many years ago, even before the formation of the Bureau.

What Happens Now?

The court granted PHH’s petition for review, vacated the CFPB’s order, and remanded to the CFPB for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the court. In doing so, the CFPB may determine, within the applicable three-year statute of limitations, whether the relevant mortgage insurers paid more than reasonable market value to the PHH-affiliated reinsurer.

Pepper Points

  • While certainly a big blow to the Bureau, the court’s remedy did not go as far as some CFPB opponents would have liked. Many Republicans have called for eliminating the Bureau altogether or, in the alternative, replacing the director with a multimember commission. This ruling provides a different course in which the Bureau proceeds with a single director, but one who is answerable to the president and can be removed without cause.

  • This ruling potentially could turn the CFPB into a political football, depending on who occupies the White House, since the CFPB is now treated as any other federal agency where the head can be replaced solely at the discretion of the president.

  • The more important issue in the case is the RESPA analysis since the court strongly rebuked the CFPB for its de novo interpretation of section 8 of RESPA and its position that no statute of limitations applies to administrative actions.

  • The strong language of the court will no doubt fuel efforts by those in Congress who believe the CFPB needs to have an oversight board and be subject to the congressional appropriations process.




1 PHH Corp. v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, No. 15 -1177, slip op. at 9 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016), available at https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/AAC6BFFC4C42614C852580490053C38B/$file/15-1177-1640101.pdf.

2 Id. at 5.

3 Id. at 10.

4 Id. at 12.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pepper Hamilton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pepper Hamilton LLP

Pepper Hamilton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.