Federal Legislative Update: Momentum Builds Around Medicare Site-Neutral Payment Policies

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Contact

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Washington policymakers are increasingly aligned around expanding Medicare “site-neutral” payment policies in 2026, a shift that would pay hospital outpatient departments the same rates as physician offices for a broader set of common services.

In November, CMS finalized a policy to align Medicare payments for certain drugs administered in physician offices and hospital outpatient departments beginning in 2026. CMS estimates that similar site-neutral payment adjustments could generate more than $6 billion in federal savings over 10 years, based on prior CBO analyses.

CMS has also signaled that additional services could be targeted in future rulemaking. In a proposed payment rule released in July, the agency solicited public input on which services should be considered for expanded site-neutral payment reforms, indicating that those comments may inform future regulatory action.

Parallel to CMS action, lawmakers are pursuing legislative options to codify payment parity. In May, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) introduced the Same Care, Lower Cost Act (S.1629), which would align Medicare payments across diagnostic imaging, skin procedures, biopsies, pathology, and more than 60 additional services commonly performed in physician offices.

More expansive legislative approaches could have significant fiscal implications. According to CBO estimates, broader site-neutral payment reforms could save up to $157 billion over 10 years. Other analyses estimate potential reductions of $94–$134 billion in Medicaid premiums and cost-sharing over the same period.

Hospital groups, including the American Hospital Association, continue to oppose expanded site-neutral policies, warning that further payment reductions could lead to workforce reductions and service cutbacks. Supporters counter that the policy would help curb hospital consolidation of physician practices—now estimated at nearly 35%—and reduce higher facility-based billing once practices are acquired.

Notably, research published in Health Affairs found that California markets with the highest levels of hospital-owned physician practices experienced a 12% increase in insurance premiums, underscoring the broader cost implications of consolidation.

With CMS signaling openness to further expansion and Congress actively weighing legislative options, site-neutral payment policy remains a key issue to watch heading into the 2026 payment cycle. As regulatory and legislative activity converges, the window for meaningful stakeholder engagement is narrowing. Decisions made over the coming months—both through statute and rulemaking—will shape Medicare payment policy well beyond 2026. This is a critical moment for affected stakeholders to engage with Congress and the Administration to ensure policymakers fully understand the operational, access, and workforce implications before positions harden and reforms are finalized.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Written by:

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide