Federal Trade Commission Announces 2026 Hart-Scott-Rodino Threshold Increases

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact

Saul Ewing LLP

The FTC just announced its annual changes to both certain thresholds which govern the need to make an HSR filing, the fees associated with required filings and the thresholds which dictate the legality of interlocking directorates. The changes will take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, which as of this writing has yet to occur.

What You Need to Know:

  • First off, remember that last year, HSR filings got much more detailed given the changes in the regulations and corresponding forms.
  • Are you involved in a merger, acquisition or other business combination or affiliation in excess of $133.9 million in value?
  • Are you aware that transactions in excess of that value, as determined under Hart-Scott-Rodino regulations, may require a Premerger Notification filing with the FTC and the U.S. Department of Justice?
  • Have you consulted with antitrust counsel concerning the possibility of having to make a mandatory HSR Premerger Notification filing?

On January 14, 2026, the FTC announced the annual updates to the HSR size thresholds, filing fees and interlocking directorate thresholds. The updated thresholds and filing fees will be published in the Federal Register shortly and will take effect 30 days after publication. See FTC Announces 2026 Update of Jurisdictional and Fee Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings. See below for the Interlocking Directorate announcement link. 

The FTC is required to revise the HSR thresholds annually based on the change in gross national product, and the new thresholds represent increases from the 2025 thresholds. To determine whether an HSR filing is required, the increased thresholds are as follows: 

Test 2026 Increased Threshold
Size of Transaction INCREASED to $133.9 million from $126.4 million
Size of Parties INCREASED to $26.8 million and $267.8 million from $25.3 million and $252.9 million (Total assets or annual net sales) 
Size of Parties Irrelevant INCREASED to $535.5 million from $505.8 million

In light of these increases, pending transactions may merit additional analysis – the deal size increase is $7.5 million, which might render a filing required under the 2025 thresholds unnecessary due to the increase. Similarly, the party size thresholds have increased, with the larger party threshold increasing by almost $15 million, so again another look might be warranted. The applicable threshold is that which is in place at the time an HSR filing is made. 

The FTC is also required to increase annually the HSR filing fees by an amount equal to the percentage increase, if any, in the consumer price index. The 2026 fee structure for HSR filings is as follows:

2026 Filing Fee Size of Transaction
$35,000 Less than $189.6 million
$110,000 $189.6 million – $586.9 million
$275,000 $586.9 million – $1.174 billion
$440,000 $1.174 billion – $2.347 billion
$875,000 $2.347 billion ­– $5.869 billion
$2,460,000 Greater than $5.869 billion

Additionally, the 2025 thresholds regarding when interlocking directorates are illegal pursuant to Section 8 of the Clayton Act have also increased, to $54,402,000 (in aggregate capital, surplus and undivided profits) (from $51,380,000) and $5,440,200 (in competitive sales) (from $5,138,000). See FTC Announces 2026 Jurisdictional Threshold Updates for Interlocking Directorates.

The FTC has yet to announce any inflation-adjusted increase for 2026 to the civil penalty amount applicable to HSR violations. The size thresholds, interlocking directorate thresholds, and new civil penalty amount (if any) will take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. In the normal course, it increases every year. 

Conclusion

We will update this alert when the increases are published in the Federal Register and an effective date is determined, and will also track a change in the HSR civil penalty amount for violations of the HSR Act and regulations. In the interim, however, parties on the verge of executing transactions which were analyzed under the 2025 thresholds should take a second cut at the analysis to determine, depending on their deal timeline, whether the need to file has been eliminated because an increased threshold is not met.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Saul Ewing LLP

Written by:

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Saul Ewing LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide