Finally, For The First Time In Over A Decade, The National Relations Labor Board Has Five Senate-Confirmed Board Members

by CMCP - California Minority Counsel Program

Those active in labor law are familiar with the political chaos that has surrounded the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) since this past January.  In six months, the NLRB went from being the subject of a Circuit Court decision that may invalidate nearly a year’s worth of NLRB decisions to having all five Senate-confirmed members for the first time in a decade.  For those unfamiliar with the political buzzing that has been circulating around the NLRB this year, here is a recap:

On January 25, 2013, in Noel Canning v. N.L.R.B[1], the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (referred to herein as the D.C. Circuit) ruled that President Obama’s three appointments to the NLRB, Sharon Block, Terence Flynn, and Richard Griffin – whom he appointed in January 2012 and who would serve staggered terms – were unconstitutional.  President Obama made the appointments when the Senate was allegedly in “recess,” and therefore claimed that he did not need to obtain the Senate approval normally required by the United States Constitution.[2]  The D.C. Circuit, however, found that the Senate was not in “recess” as defined by the U.S. Constitution, but was holding “pro forma” sessions: although the Senate was not conducting any business, it was still meeting every few days.[3]  President Obama argued that the “pro forma” sessions rendered the Senate unable to confirm his nominations; the D.C. Circuit, however, held that a president’s recess appointments could only be made during intersession recesses (i.e. breaks between sessions of Congress), rather than during intrasession recesses (i.e. breaks within sessions of Congress).[4]  The D.C. Circuit did note that a few presidents had, in fact, made intrasession recess appointments pre-1947; however, no president attempted such appointments for eighty years after the Constitution was ratified, and when intrasession appointments were made, it was very rare.[5]  Mandating intersession appointments instead of intrasession appointments, according to the D.C. Circuit, was consistent with the intentions of the framers of the U.S. Constitution.[6] 

By invalidating President Obama’s appointments to the NLRB, the D.C. Circuit found that the NLRB had been operating without the three-member quorum required to issue decisions, and thus invalidated nearly a year’s worth of NLRB decisions.  Unsurprisingly, rather that re-visit the decisions issued in 2012, the NLRB has been waiting to see what the United States Supreme Court will hold, as it granted certiorari in Noel Canning on June 24, 2013.  Terrence Flynn left the Board in July 2012, but Sharon Block and Richard Griffin have continued to serve on the Board with Board Chairman Mark Pearce and fellow board member Brian Hayes.[7]  Because board members serve staggered terms, Hayes’s term expired in December 2012 and the Board has since been operating with the bare minimum of three members.[8]  However, Chairman Pearce’s term was set to expire on August 27, 2013, meaning that the NLRB would have lost its quorum of three members required to issue decisions.  This would have effectively shut down the NLRB and prohibited it from ruling on any cases until a full quorum was reached.

Finding that such a shutdown would render the NLRB unable to protect union workers from unfair labor practices, unions embarked on a campaign to pressure the Senate into confirming new nominees.[9]  Senators were at odds too: the Democrats threatened to challenge filibuster rules to force a vote on the nominees and Republicans threated to object to the President’s nominations.  So, to end the political fight, the Senate entered into a bipartisan deal – both parties would back down – and the White House agreed to appoint two new members (both Democrats) to replace the two recess appointees – Block and Griffin – who had been serving on the Board.[10] 

On July 30, 2013, the Senate confirmed all five new nominees to the National Relations Labor Board (NLRB): Mark Pearce (D) – the current chairman, who had been confirmed by the Senate in 2011 and was now re-nominated by President Obama; Nancy Schiffer (D), President Obama’s first new nominee; Kent Hirozawa (D), President Obama’s second new nominee, who was also former Chief Counsel to Chairman Mark Pearce; Harry Johnson III (R), who was nominated by the Republican party; and Philip Miscimarra (R), who was nominated by the Republican party as well.

Although this Board is consistent with the tradition of a three-member majority from the president’s party, it is the first time in a decade that the Board has been completely filled with Senate-confirmed board members.  And as we saw in Noel Canning, operating without confirmed board members can have the ramification of invalidating NLRB decisions…a situation that is not unfamiliar to the NLRB.  For instance, in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board, the United States Supreme Court held that NLRB had been operating for over a year without the 3-member quorum required to issue decisions.[11]  This decision invalidated every single NLRB decision issued between January 2008 and April 2010, and required the NLRB to revisit each of the 554 decisions and re-issue decisions with a three-member quorum.[12]

So is the NLRB finally out of the limelight?  Hardly.  If the Supreme Court upholds the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in Noel Canning, it will not only confirm the limitation on the executive branch’s power to sidestep the legislature and make appointments without its consent, but will force the NLRB to, once again, reexamine a year’s worth of decisions and issue new rulings with an official Senate-confirmed quorum.  If, on the other hand, the Supreme Court overrules the Noel Canning decision, it will officially expand the authority of the executive branch’s appointment powers.  And to start a new wave of controversy, on August 1, 2013, President Obama nominated Richard Griffin – the recess appointee whose place on the Board was booted by the new, Senate-confirmed appointees – to serve as the NLRB’s General Counsel, a role that some say is even stronger than a board member, as the General Counsel is the one who decides which labor cases to prosecute.[13]  In the meantime – while we wait for the Supreme Court to issue a decision on Noel Canning and the Senate’s reaction to Griffin’s nomination – the five-member, Senate-confirmed Board is expected to hear cases effectively and efficiently and issue decisions that will affect employees and employers throughout the country.

Archana R. Acharya is an Associate at Foley & Lardner LLP
and is a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. | 213-972-4560

Written by:

CMCP - California Minority Counsel Program

CMCP - California Minority Counsel Program on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.