Financial Service Company’s Nonqualified Plan Found to be an ERISA Pension Plan

by Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

In Tolbert v. RBC Capital Markets (July 14, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a deferred incentive compensation plan maintained by a financial services company for certain employees was an “employee pension benefit plan” (pension plan) for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).

By way of background, many businesses across all industries commonly offer executive compensation plans. In addition, many financial services companies offer similar plans for their agents, financial consultants or advisers, or other client-facing representatives. These “nonqualified” plans (i.e., plans that are not tax-qualified retirement plans under Internal Revenue Code § 401(a)) generally serve the same business purpose – to provide additional compensation reflecting the full value of the services provided by the covered participants, the receipt of which is postponed to incent performance or retention or to achieve other business objectives. Generally, these plans are structured so as not to constitute pension plans subject to ERISA, for at least two reasons:

  • These plans conventionally are intended to defer the tax recognition of income until actually received by the participants, making them “deferred compensation plans” in tax parlance. In contrast, if such a plan is subject to the ERISA trust and funding requirements applicable to pension plans, compliance with those requirements will cause participants to be taxed immediately on their plan benefits once funded and vested, even if they have not yet received those benefits; and

  • These plans often condition payment on the future attainment of performance objectives, ongoing services for a period of time, compliance with valid non-compete provisions, or other similar business terms. The employer may very well scale the compensation commitments it makes under the plan in reliance on those conditions. ERISA requires, however, that benefits in a pension plan vest within a specified period of time and thereafter may not be forfeited for any reason, which would override these otherwise legitimate business conditions in the plan.

At least in part to accommodate these types of nonqualified arrangements, Congress limited the scope of ERISA in three ways on which these plans rely:

  • ERISA is inapplicable to plans that cover independent contractors rather than common-law employees. Nationwide Mutual Ins. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318 (1992). Indeed, the facts in Darden involved a deferred incentive plan for independent contractor insurance agents that had design similarities to the program in Tolbert;
  • The ERISA trust, funding and vesting requirements are also inapplicable if the plan is not a “pension plan,” i.e., a plan that “(i) provides retirement income to employees or (ii) results in a deferral of income by employees for periods extending to the termination of covered employment or beyond.” ERISA § 3(2); Darden, supra; and
  • A pension plan nonetheless is not subject to the ERISA trust, funding and vesting requirements that conflict with the business and tax objectives for nonqualified plans described above if such a plan is a “top hat” plan, i.e., an unfunded plan “maintained by the employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees.” ERISA §§ 201(2), 301(a)(3), 401(a)(1); Alexander v. Brigham & Women’s Physicians Organization Inc., 513 F.3d 37 (1st Cir 2008); Duggan v. Hobbs, 99 F.3d 307 (9th Cir 1996).

Disputes about the ERISA status of these programs arise from time to time, which can present difficult challenges for the courts. Plaintiffs typically are former participants who are no longer in service with the employer and have forfeited benefits in a manner they assert is both inequitable and contrary to the statute. Employers find it troubling that the former participants at least indirectly benefited from the non-ERISA status of the plan and its conditions on payment while in service and now seek to avoid those essential conditions when applied to them. The authority on the pertinent ERISA definitions has been developed primarily in judicial decisions, with the usual limitations of that process including differing perspectives on the methodology a court should properly bring to applying the statute to a particular set of facts.

Tolbert proved to be such a case. The deferred incentive plan offered by RBC to eligible financial consultants and certain other employees included the following, familiar elements:

  • A voluntary, elective deferred compensation component, which was nonforfeitable at all times;
  • A mandatory deferred compensation component designated by RBC, which was subject to vesting requirements; and
  • A company-provided component tied to productivity, length of service and/or elective deferrals, which was also subject to vesting requirements.

The mandatory deferred compensation and company-provided components vested after a specified period of service or upon death or disability or upon voluntary termination meeting certain conditions. In general, these amounts were immediately payable upon vesting. In some cases, however, the plan participant could choose to defer payment until or after he or she left RBC, but if the participant was later terminated for cause then the outstanding deferred balance would be forfeited.

The plaintiffs in Tolbert were participants who either terminated before fully vesting or were terminated for cause after deferring a portion of their payments, and asserted that the forfeiture of their plan benefits was contrary to ERISA. The district court granted RBC’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the program was not an ERISA pension plan on the basis that any deferral of income resulted from the participant’s election rather than the express terms of the plan and that nothing in the surrounding circumstances supported a different result. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reversed. The court agreed that the plan did not provide retirement income, but found that by its express terms the plan did provide for the deferral of income to the termination of covered employment or beyond because of the following:

  • The plan document referred to the plan as a “deferred compensation plan”;

  • Components of the plan were referred to as “Voluntary Deferred Compensation” and “Mandatory Deferred Compensation”; and
  • The plan by its terms included provisions for distributions on separation from service or later.

That conclusion precluded, in the court’s view, any need to consider the surrounding circumstances, RBC’s reliance on a prior Fifth Circuit decision concerning a bonus plan, or amicus arguments about policy considerations. The court also declined RBC’s invitation to affirm on the basis that the plan was a top hat plan, leaving that issue to be determined on remand.

Tolbert thus makes another contribution to the not easily reconcilable body of case law that applies the definitional provisions of ERISA to nonqualified plans. Its distinctive characteristic may be its strict text-based analysis of both the statute and the plan. For example:

  • The opinion cites at one point Justice Scalia’s Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts; and
  • The decision rests significantly on descriptions and defined terms in the plan document that conventionally are intended not to have analytic import. (In the usual manner, the Fifth Circuit did not credit the statement in the plan document going to the issue for decision – that the plan was not intended to be an ERISA pension plan. Had instead the dispute been about the tax consequences of the plan, one wonders whether the Tax Court would have accepted the statement in the plan about its ERISA status.)

To the extent such a circumscribed judicial methodology is gaining traction, it should, at a minimum, be taken into account in the drafting of nonqualified plans.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.