On March 2, 2026, Bill St. Louis, FINRA’s Executive Vice President of Enforcement, published a blog post outlining significant enhancements to FINRA’s Enforcement Program. These changes are part of FINRA’s broader FINRA Forward initiatives, which aim to improve the organization’s effectiveness and efficiency in pursuing its mission of investor protection and market integrity.
The changes to FINRA’s Enforcement program mark a meaningful shift in how investigations will be initiated, managed, and resolved, and firms should view these developments as an important opportunity to proactively strengthen their regulatory readiness. As described by Mr. St. Louis, the enhancements are guided by three overarching goals: (1) driving greater transparency, (2) improving operational efficiency, and (3) providing firms with more opportunities to be heard throughout the Enforcement process.
This alert summarizes the key enhancements and provides practical considerations for how firms may want to position themselves to be prepared and respond effectively.
Key Enhancements to the FINRA Enforcement Process
________________________________________
1. Initial Notification Letters and Introductory Meetings
What’s New: When a matter is referred to Enforcement, FINRA will send an Initial Notification Letter to the potential respondent. This letter will also include an invitation to meet with the Enforcement staff assigned to the case. The introductory meeting is designed to provide the respondent with an overview of the Enforcement process, identify FINRA’s initial areas of focus, and allow the firm to ask questions or raise concerns at the outset.
Practical Recommendation: Firms can prepare for the meeting by reviewing relevant documents and designating appropriate personnel (including outside counsel where warranted) to attend. The introductory meeting also provides firms with an opportunity to establish a constructive working relationship with assigned staff. After learning about FINRA’s focus, firms may consider following up with a written submission explaining any factual or legal issues the firm believes warrant communication or correction. In addition, where circumstances warrant, firms should consider beginning remediation efforts promptly.
________________________________________
2. Pre-Rule 8210 Outreach
What’s New: In non-exigent circumstances, FINRA Enforcement attorneys will now contact firms during an investigation before issuing Rule 8210 requests to attempt to clarify the scope of FINRA’s requests and the staff’s expectations; to give firms the opportunity to understand what FINRA is seeking and ask clarifying questions; and to address potential burden or scope concerns before FINRA issues a formal request.
Practical Recommendation: This outreach allows firms to suggest alternative or additional documents that may be more relevant to FINRA’s inquiry. It also provides an opportunity to raise potential privilege issues with staff before formally withholding documents and submitting a privilege log.
________________________________________
3. Mandatory 90-Day Status Updates
What’s New: FINRA now requires Enforcement staff to provide status updates to potential respondents at least every 90 days throughout an investigation. As Mr. St. Louis noted, “[t]hese regular touchpoints ensure potential respondents are not left wondering about the status of their matter.”
Practical Recommendation: Firms may use these status updates to maintain ongoing internal communication with relevant business units and to prepare for potential next steps. These touchpoints can also provide opportunities to share with FINRA relevant advocacy updates, such as completed remediation efforts or additional context that may inform the investigation.
________________________________________
4. Rule 4530(b) Self-Reporting Pilot Program
What’s New: FINRA has introduced a pilot program for firms that proactively self-report certain rule violations under Rule 4530(b). Under this framework, if there is no ongoing harm to investors or markets, FINRA may permit the firm to conduct its own internal investigation and remediation before FINRA issues formal document requests. FINRA may determine that a full Enforcement investigation is not warranted based on the firm’s self-reported findings and remediation. However, FINRA reserves the right to conduct its own investigation if its mission requires.
Practical Recommendation: A well-documented internal investigation (covering methodology, findings, root cause analysis, and remediation), combined with regular progress updates to FINRA, may result in FINRA determining that no further investigation is required.
________________________________________
5. Pre-Wells Investigative Findings Meeting
What’s New: Near the conclusion of an Enforcement investigation, but prior to a Wells notification, FINRA now offers firms a meeting to discuss investigative findings and the evidence underlying those findings. This meeting does not replace the Wells process. Firms retain their full Wells submission rights, and the standard Wells response period has been extended to 30 calendar days.
Practical Recommendation: This pre-Wells meeting can serve as a critical advocacy opportunity. Firms may want to prepare a white paper or informal response summarizing the firm’s position on factual issues, highlighting mitigating factors, and addressing any perceived weaknesses in FINRA’s evidence before formal charges are proposed. This proactive approach may influence Enforcement’s disposition decision and help narrow or resolve issues before the Wells stage.
________________________________________
6. Pre-Cautionary Action Letter Outreach
What’s New: A Cautionary Action Letter (CAL) is an informal disciplinary resolution that FINRA may issue at the conclusion of an investigation. FINRA Enforcement attorneys will now reach out to firms before issuing a CAL to discuss preliminary findings and allow the firms to provide context or challenge conclusions.
Practical Recommendation: After this outreach, firms may want to present mitigating information, correct factual misunderstandings, provide additional context, and present legal issues to potentially affect the outcome.
________________________________________
Forthcoming Guidance and Continued Reform
Mr. St. Louis’s blog post indicated that FINRA’s Enforcement program will continue to evolve throughout the year:
- Cooperation and Remediation Credit Guidance: FINRA plans to issue guidance clarifying its approach to granting credit for cooperation and remediation—a significant development for firms seeking to understand how their conduct during an investigation may affect outcomes.
- Alternatives to On-the-Record Testimony: FINRA is exploring alternatives to formal on-the-record testimony in appropriate instances.
- Enforcement Manual: FINRA expects to publish an Enforcement Manual, which would provide firms with additional clarity on Enforcement policies and procedures.
- External Review: Former SEC Commissioner Troy Paredes and William & Mary Law Professor Paul Eckert are conducting an external review of FINRA’s Enforcement Program, with findings expected in Q2 2026.
Conclusion
Firms may want to re-review Mr. St. Louis’s blog post every time they interact with FINRA Enforcement. These new procedural touchpoints provide firms with greater opportunities to engage effectively at each stage—from initial notification through resolution.
