Florida Should Move Away From Lex Loci Contractus

by Zelle LLP
Contact

Zelle  LLP

Insurance Law360
July 7, 2017

All litigators know choice of law issues can be complex, fact-intensive and outcome determinative. This is particularly true in cases involving subject matters where the individualized state laws are so divisive, which is the case in matters involving insurance law. Because the consequential effects of a choice of law analysis will often lead to changes in the substantive law, a savvy practitioner will examine choice of law issues first in every insurance contract dispute to anticipate what rules may govern the coverage litigation.

A contract is the legal term for an agreement between two or more persons that creates, modifies or destroys a binding relationship between the parties.[1] Contracts exist in nearly every aspect of our daily lives, from contracts that govern our employment to the contracts with our childcare and medical providers. These everyday contracts may be governed by different choice of law standards. For example, with respect to torts, Florida has always followed the “significant relationship test” in resolving conflict of law issues.[2] That test, in the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws section 145, provides as follows: (1) the rights and liabilities of the parties with respect to an issue in tort are determined by the local law of the state which, with respect to that issue, has the most significant relationship to the occurrence and the parties under the principles stated in section 6; and, (2) contacts to be taken into account in applying the principles of section 6 to determine the law applicable to an issue include: (a) the place where the injury occurred; (b) the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred; (c) the domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties; (d) the place where the relationship, if any, between the parties is centered.”[3]

In examining insurance contracts however, Florida courts have long adhered to the doctrine of lex loci contractus set forth in the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws which states that the law of the place of contracting determines the validity and effect of a promise with respect to: (a) the capacity to make the contract; (b) the necessary form, if any, in which the promise must be made; (c) the mutual assent or consideration, if any, required to make a promise binding; (d) any other requirements for making a promise binding; (e) fraud, illegality, or any other circumstances which make a promise void or voidable; (f) except as stated in section 358, the nature and extent of the duty for the performance of which a party becomes bound; (g) the time when and the place where the promise is by its terms to be performed; (h) the absolute or conditional character of the promise.[4]

Although once widely accepted in most jurisdictions, today lex loci contractus is considered the minority rule with only 12 states still utilizing it.[5] While the doctrine is considered to result in a more predictable outcome in situations where the place of contracting and performance are in the same state, many courts differ in its application. The disagreement as to the application can lead to incongruous results and defeats the very purpose of the doctrine — the ability to prognosticate the outcome of a particular dispute in a specific jurisdiction. The lex loci contractus doctrine has also been criticized as being too rigid, too difficult to apply, and not adequately recognizing the policy interests of the involved states. The overarching problem in applying the doctrine remains constant — how does the court determine the place where the contract was made, in the current era of electronic communications? How does one account for the fact that in the age of electronic communications, the clarity of geographic boundaries is blurred by intangible internet border crossings? In other words, how will parties that frequently conduct negotiations electronically, determine where the contract is consummated or bound? This additional level of complexity makes an already daunting task even more challenging for most practitioners.

In Florida, the doctrine of lex loci contractus was first adopted in Sturiano v. Brooks.[6] In that case, Mrs. Sturiano brought an action against her husband’s estate alleging negligence following a car accident in which he was killed and she was injured.[7] Following a jury verdict in favor of Mrs. Sturiano, Brooks, the guardian ad litem, appealed to the fourth district.[8] The court reversed the verdict, holding that the doctrine of lex loci contractus required that New York law be applied because the insurance contract was executed in New York.[9] Under an applicable New York statute, the action was barred unless the insurance policy specifically included coverage for claims between spouses, which was absent from the Sturiano policy. Absent such a provision, no coverage would be afforded.[10] The insurance policy at issue did not allow for claims between spouses.[11] Mrs. Sturiano argued that choice of law rules should be flexible to allow courts to apply the laws which best accommodate the parties and the host jurisdiction.[12] She further argued that lex loci contractus did not address modern issues or problems in the area of conflict of laws.[13] While the court agreed the doctrine was old, it did not agree that it was outdated, stating “the very reason Mrs. Sturiano gives as support for discarding lex loci contractus, namely that we live in a migratory, transitory society, provides support for upholding that doctrine.”[14] The court also noted that parties have a right to know what the agreement they have executed provides, or more simply stated, “when parties come to an agreement, they do so with the implied acknowledgement that the laws of the jurisdiction will control absent some provision to the contrary.”[15]

The applicability of the lex loci contractus doctrine in Sturiano v. Brooks, resulted in a change in substantive law that deprived Mrs. Sturiano of benefits that would have been due had another state’s [Florida] law been applied. A choice of law analysis in any jurisdiction is often outcome driven and fact specific and this case is illustrative of how the result of that analysis can change the outcome of an entire dispute. This is a prime example of how the determination of the governing state law as a result of a choice of law analysis can take the outcome of a lawsuit from a verdict in favor of the petitioner to being completely barred. It can be a zero-sum game and for Mrs. Sturiano, it was.

In 1971, the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws brought about its first major shift, adopted by several states, moving away from the lex loci contractus doctrine and toward the “significant relationships test.” This approach, enumerated in the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws in section 188 is aptly titled the “Law Governing in Absence of Effective Choice by the Parties.”[16] It provides, “[t]he rights and duties of the parties with respect to an issue in contract are determined by the local law of the state which, with respect to that issue, has the most significant relationship to the transaction and the parties under the principles stated in section 6. In the absence of an effective choice of law by the parties, the contacts are to be taken into account in applying the principles of section 6 to determine the law applicable to an issue including: (a) the place of contracting; (b) the place of negotiation of the contract; (c) the place of performance; (d) the location of the subject matter of the contract, and; (e) the domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties.”[17]

The Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws also contains several general provisions that are considered before moving to the more specific provisions. Most often thought of as a multifactor analysis, section 187 creates a strong presumption that any choice of law provision in a contract will be effective and enforced by the court, while section 193 creates a presumption that the law of the principal place of the insured risk will govern in disputes involving fire, surety or casualty insurance contracts.[18] Similarly, section 206 presumes that any issues related to the performance of a contract will be determined by the law of the place where the contract was performed.[19] Much of the uncertainty surrounding the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is related to its general provisions, namely section 6 (general choice of law provisions) and section 188 (most significant relationship).[20] Many courts look to these provisions with decreased emphasis because other sections of the restatement call for application of a section 188 analysis. For example, section 204, Construction of Words Used in Contract, requires that in the absence of an enforceable choice of law provision and “when the meaning which the parties intended to convey by words used in a contract cannot satisfactorily be ascertained, the words will be construed in accordance with the local law of the state selected by application of the rule of section 188.”[21] Application of section 188 may lead to confusion and misuse.

While courts continue to struggle with the application of this analysis, there are some clear instances where reason has had to yield to practicality. In matters involving the application of section 193 where an insurance contract involves multistate risks, the parties must defer to the most significant relationship test of section 188 for a choice of law analysis.[22] This section has caused many challenges for litigants and is perhaps one of the reasons why the Florida Supreme Court has been hesitant to openly declare a departure from the lex loci contractus doctrine.

For nearly a century, the courts have held “that the rules of comity may not be departed from, unless in certain cases, for the purpose of necessary protection of our own citizens, or of enforcing some paramount rule of public policy.”[23] This proposition became the foundation for the “public policy exception” first recognized by the Florida Supreme Court in State Farm Mut. Auto. Insurance Co. v. Roach.[24] With respect to insurance contracts, the Florida Supreme Court sets forth the requirement that the insurer must have reasonable notice that the insured is a Florida citizen in need of protection.[25] When applying this exception, courts must “consider whether the insured notified the insurer of a permanent change of residence and whether the insured risk is or will be primarily located in Florida.”[26] The notice requirement allows an insurer to weigh the consequence of issuing the policy, provides the opportunity to withdraw from one, or for Florida licensed insurers, the option of issuing the policy and then charging an appropriate premium.[27] Florida’s public policy interest is paramount to the determination of disputes within its jurisdiction. Because of this, the public policy exception is prohibitively narrow and only displaces the insurer where there is clear notice that the insured is not merely a temporary visitor, but a permanent Florida resident. The issue presented in Roach was “whether residents of another state who reside in Florida for several months during the year (a common factor to many Florida residents), who purchased an insurance contract while in Florida, may invoke Florida’s public policy exception to the rule of lex loci contractus as an exclusionary clause in the policy.” The Florida Supreme Court rejected the significant relationships test set forth in Sturiano, before reaffirming that lex loci contractus controls. [28] It acknowledged that while “lexi loci contractus is an inflexible rule,” its “inflexibility is necessary to ensure stability in contract arrangements.”[29] Further reasoning that to “abandon this principle and permit a party to change or modify contract terms by moving to another state would unnecessarily disrupt the stability of contract.”[30]

Although some have argued that the Florida Supreme Court’s rulings should be limited to automobile policies, or mobile risks, most courts have rejected that argument and have applied lex loci contractus in circumstances involving commercial policies covering risks in multiple states.[31] For instance, in Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Peninsula II Developers Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida addressed how to determine where an insurance policy had been executed.[32] As part of its analysis, the court noted two schools of thought: (1) the place where an acceptance (or a binder) is received, or (2) the place from where the acceptance (or a binder) was sent.[33] Authority for both approaches was evaluated by the court in the following manner:

At least two Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decisions follow the first approach. For example, in Prime Insurance Synd. Inc. v. B.J. Handley Truck Inc., the Eleventh Circuit held that Alabama law applied to a policy where the insurance company (located in Illinois) took the last act necessary to execute a contract by communicating an oral binder with a company residing in Alabama because the insured received acceptance of the oral agreement in Alabama.[34] Similarly, in Indus. Chem. & Fiberglass Corp. v. The N. River Insurance Co., the Eleventh Circuit held that the last act necessary to the execution of a policy was “the receipt and acceptance of the policies by the named insured, which took place in New York.”[35]

With regard to the second approach noted in Club Caribe, additional authority under Florida law states that an acceptance is effective, and the last act to execute a contract occurs, in the location where the acceptance was made or transmitted. For example, in CNL Hotels & Resorts Inc. v. Houston Cas. Co., the court held that New York law should apply to an insurance policy when the binder was sent from New York to Florida because “[u]nder Florida law, the most compelling factor is the place of execution of the contract, not the place or places to which it was eventually mailed.”[36] This approach follows the restatement in that it confirms that a contract is made at the time an acceptance leaves the offeree’s possession.[37]

While the Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws has done very little to move the tide in Florida away from the lex loci contractus approach, many other jurisdictions have abandoned their use of the doctrine in favor of the “significant relationships test.” This departure was thought to bring a more modern approach to contract interpretation. Unfortunately, the Eleventh Circuit rejected this approach in favor of the lex loci contractus doctrine. However, it is noteworthy that the Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws has now fully exposed the flaws and challenges associated with the antiquated doctrine and propelled the movement away from its predecessor. With the Restatement (Third) Conflict of Laws on the horizon, practitioners and scholars alike are left wondering whether the latest version will address issues that plague complex insurance coverage disputes such as choice of law for insurance contracts involving multistate risks. It is not an understatement to say that the authors of the Restatement (Third) Conflict of Laws have the balance of outcome determinative power in their hands; may they wield it wisely.

[1] Black’s Law Dictionary.

[2] Bishop v. Fla. Specialty Paint. Co., 389 So. 2d 999, 1001 (Fla. 1980).

[3] See Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §145 (1971).

[4] Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws §332 (1934).

[5] Id.

[6] Sturiano v. Brooks, 523 So. 2d 1126, 1129 (Fla. 1988).

[7] Id. at 1127.

[8] Id.

[9] Id.

[10] Id.

[11] Id.

[12] Id.

[13] Id.

[14] Id at 1130.

[15] Id.

[16] See Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (1971).

[17] Id.

[18] Id. at §§187, 193.

[19] Id. at §206.

[20] Id. at §6, 188.

[21] Id. at §204.

[22] Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §193 (1971).

[23] Herron v. Passailaigue, 110 So. 539, 542 (Fla. 1926); see also In re Estate of Nicole Santos, 648 So. 2d 277, 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (“We agree that Florida courts may depart from the rule of comity where necessary to protect its citizens or to enforce some paramount rules of public policy.”).

[24] State Farm Mut. Auto. Insurance Co. v. Roach, 945 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2006).

[25] Roach, 945 So. 2d at 1164-65.

[26] Id. (citing N.J. Mfrs. Insurance Co. v. Woodward, 456 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (Florida law not applicable where auto policy was issued and delivered to insureds while they were permanent residents of New Jersey and the insurer had notice of insured’s change in mailing address).

[27] Tenn. Farmers Mut. Insurance Co. v. Meador, 467 So. 2d 471, 472 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (noting that upon receiving notice of the insured’s move to a state where the insurer did not operate, the insurer sent notice of its intent not to renew the policy).

[28] Sturiano v. Brooks, 523 So. 2d 1126, 1128-29 (Fla. 1988) (expressly limiting its decision to insurance for automobiles which are a mobile risk); Roach, 945 So. 2d at 1169 (“the law of the jurisdiction where the contract was executed governs the rights and liabilities of the parties in determining an issue of insurance coverage”).

[29] Id.

[30] Roach, 945 So. 2d at 1164.

[31] See, e.g., Club Caribe Condo. Ass’n Inc., v. Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Co., No. 11-62673, 2012 WL 529972 at * 3, (S.D. Fla. Feb. 17, 2012); Liberty Mut. Insurance Co. v. Festival Fun Parks LLC, No, 12-62212, 2013 WL 4496511 at * 3-4 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2013).

[32] Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Peninsula II Developers Inc., No. 09-23691, 2010 WL 11451835, at * 4-5 (S.D. Fla. Oct 19, 2010) (In American Home, both approaches resulted in the application of California law, therefore the court did not opine on which approach was preferred).

[33] Id. at *7.

[34] Prime Insurance Synd., Inc. v. B.J. Handley Truck Inc., 363 F.3d 1089, 1092-93 (11th Cir. 2004).

[35] Indus. Chem. & Fiberglass Corp. v. The N. River Insurance Co., 908 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir. 1990).

[36] 505 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 1321 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

[37] Restatement (Second) Contracts § 63 (1979) (“an acceptance made in a manner and by a medium invited by an offerer is operative and completes the manifestation of mutual assent as soon as put out of the offeree’s possession, without regard to whether it ever reaches the offeror”); see also, Pezold Air Charters v. Phoenix, 192 F.R.D. 721 (M.D. Fla. 2000) (“An acceptance is effective when, and thus where, dispatched.”).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Zelle LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Zelle  LLP
Contact
more
less

Zelle LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.