Florida Supreme Court Declares "Superpriority" Municipal Liens Invalid

by Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Contact

It has become increasingly common in recent years for Florida municipalities to enact local ordinances granting so-called “superpriority” status to liens for municipal assessments.  These types of ordinances typically state that municipal liens enjoy a higher priority than any other lien, including the lien of a first mortgage holder.  In Sarasota, for example, both the City and the County have enacted a number of such ordinances, granting themselves superpriority status for liens imposed for a variety of assessments for services ranging from the clearing of rubbish or overgrowth, to towing and impounding motor vehicles, to performing fire rescues, among much else.  Due to the purported superpriority status of municipal liens, banks, title companies, real estate professionals, and foreclosure purchasers typically assume that such liens cannot be avoided through the foreclosure process, since the foreclosed mortgage would necessarily be lower in priority than the municipality’s superpriority lien.  Accordingly, many times banks do not even join municipal lienholders as defendants in a foreclosure action.

The Florida Supreme Court, however, recently turned these long-standing practices and assumptions upside down with its ruling in City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. SC11-830 (Fla. May 16, 2013).  At issue in Palm Bay was a municipal ordinance granting superpriority status to all municipal liens, which the City justified based on its “broad home rule powers.”  The Court noted, however, that the source of such powers, Article VIII, section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution, provides that municipal powers are subject to limitation “as otherwise provided by law.”  While the Court acknowledged the broad general authority of municipalities to enact ordinances under their home rule powers and to regulate concurrently with the Legislature, the Court reiterated the well-established principle that municipalities may not regulate subjects that are expressly preempted by State law.  The Court further noted that such “preemption need not be explicit so long as it is clear that the legislature has clearly preempted local regulation on the subject.”

Turning to the superpriority lien ordinance at issue in the case, the Court cited two statutes as evidence of the States’s intent to preempt the subject of lien priority.  First, Florida Statutes § 695.11 provides that the sequence in which an instrument is recorded in the official public register determines its priority as to other instruments, with the lower number holding the higher priority.  Second, the Court cited Florida Statutes § 695.01(1), which provides that no conveyance, transfer, or mortgage of a property interest is valid against a subsequent bona fide purchaser unless it is recorded in the public register.  This is commonly known as a “recording statute,” because it requires a property interest to be publicly recorded in order to maintain its priority against later-acquired interests.

In striking down the City’s municipal ordinance, the Court held that the ordinance “establishes a priority that is inconsistent with the priority established by the pertinent provisions of chapter 695.”  The ordinance, the Court reasoned, displaced the policy judgments of the Legislature and “destroy[ed] rights that the Legislature established by state law.  A more direct conflict with a statute is hard to imagine.”  The Court concluded that the municipal ordinance could not be reconciled with the Legislature’s statutory priority scheme, and therefore, the ordinance was invalid. 

The Court concluded its ruling by rejecting the City’s argument that its own exceptions to the Legislature’s statutory scheme were justified by the fact that the Legislature itself had created numerous exceptions to the recording statute.  This was similar to the position adopted by dissenting Justices Perry and Pariente, who concluded that the existence of such numerous exceptions indicated that the Legislature did not in fact intend its statutory scheme to be so pervasive as to preclude concurrent regulation by municipalities, which is generally permitted in the absence of an explicit prohibition from the Legislature.  The majority, however, categorically rejected this argument, holding that the City’s ordinance directly and irreconcilably conflicted with the Legislature’s statutory scheme, and that the Legislature’s power to craft exceptions to its own statutes in no way implied a similar power for municipalities.  “In this context,” the Court concluded, “concurrent power does not mean equal power.”

The Palm Bay decision comes as welcome news to lenders, title companies, and others involved in the foreclosure market.  The ruling removes a cloud of uncertainty from the titles of properties subject to such liens and simplifies the foreclosure process.  Until now, lenders often faced the unpleasant choice between releasing their mortgages, allowing themselves to be foreclosed by the municipal lienholder, or paying off the municipal liens to save their mortgages.  The Palm Bay decision is also certain to help the balance sheets of lenders and other purchasers who acquire title pursuant to a foreclosure sale, as municipal liens can now be extinguished.  Going forward, it will be important for lenders and their attorneys to join municipalities as defendants in foreclosure actions, in order to take advantage of the relief Palm Bay provides.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Contact
more
less

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.