Flummoxed By FLANAX: TTAB Cancels Trademark Registration Based On Misrepresentation As To Source Despite No Use In U.S. By Petitioner

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

CaptureIn an interesting precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) canceled a registration for FLANAX despite the fact that the petitioner, Bayer Consumer Care AG, did not use FLANAX in the United States, but only in Mexico.  The case illustrates that the “misrepresentation as to source” provision of the Lanham Act can be a useful tool in egregious cases, and can be asserted even when a registration is no longer vulnerable to cancellation based on likelihood of confusion grounds under Section 2(d) because of the passage of time.

Factual Background:  FLANAX is the ALEVE of Mexico

Bayer sells the pain reliever naproxen sodium under the brand name ALEVE in the United States and under the brand name FLANAX in Mexico.  Bayer presented evidence that FLANAX is the best-selling pain reliever in Mexico, and had been sold under that mark since 1976.  The respondent, Belmora LLC, is a one-man operation that describes its business as “provid[ing] a user-friendly menu of OTC drug products for common ailments to U.S. residents of Hispanic background.”  The TTAB found that Belmora (1) adopted the FLANAX mark in the United States for naproxen sodium-based analgesics knowing of its widespread use in Mexico on identical products; (2) copied Bayer’s Mexican packaging, including the font and color scheme; and (3) repeatedly invoked the reputation of Bayer’s FLANAX mark in Mexico when marketing Belmora’s FLANAX products in the United States.

No Use, No Problem!

Based on this evidence, the TTAB held as a matter of first impression that Bayer had proven misrepresentation of source even though Bayer had never used FLANAX in the United States.  Belmora argued that the territorial principles of trademark law allowed it to register and use FLANAX in the United States, since Bayer did not use or intend to use FLANAX in the United States and Belmora did not use or intend to use FLANAX in Mexico.  The TTAB rejected that argument on the grounds that consumers in the United States were harmed as a result of Belmora’s misrepresentations of source, and that the claim would therefore lie.

Elements of Misrepresentation of Source

To prevail on a claim of misrepresentation of source, the complaining party must show that the respondent deliberately passed off its goods as those of the other, or otherwise engaged in blatant misuse of a mark in a manner calculated to trade on the goodwill and reputation of the complaining party.  Willful use of a confusingly similar mark does not meet this high standard — something more is needed.  Because Belmora copied Bayer’s Mexican packaging and repeatedly referred to Bayer’s reputation in Mexico, the TTAB found that Bayer easily met the appropriate standard.  The TTAB noted, “Although the facts before us present a matter of first impression, they do not present a close case.”

What About the Well-Known Marks Doctrine?

This outcome is particularly interesting given the inconsistent results reached in civil cases involving marks that are famous abroad but which are not used by the trademark owner in the United States.  Generally speaking, a plaintiff must be using its trademark in the United States in order to enforce its rights against a would-be infringer in the United States — otherwise, there are no trademark rights to enforce.  In some cases, defendants have taken advantage of this fact by adopting a mark that is well-known outside the United States for identical goods or services within the United States, in a blatant attempt to trade off the goodwill of the original trademark owner and confuse consumers into believing that the businesses are related.

Plaintiffs in these situations have sometimes relied upon the co-called well-known marks doctrine, based on Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, which is implemented in Section 44 of the Lanham Act.  Courts have reached differing conclusions as to whether a claim for civil trademark infringement or dilution lies in these circumstances.

In the TTAB cancellation action, Bayer effectively sought to invoke the well-known marks doctrine by petitioning to cancel Belmora’s registration based on Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, as well as asserting misrepresentation as to source and other claims.  In a prior decision partially granting Belmora’s motion to dismiss, the TTAB noted that neither Article 6bis nor its implementing statute, Section 44, affords an independent basis for cancelation absent use in the United States, but went on to cite a case in a footnote explicitly recognizing the possibility that “in an unusual case, activity outside the United States related to a mark could potentially result in the mark becoming well-known within the United States, even without any form of activity in the United States.”

It is unfortunate that this issue was not considered on the full record in the Bayer case, as it is hard to imagine a more “unusual case” in which a defendant sought to take advantage of the fame of the plaintiff’s trademark abroad, and the trademark bar would benefit from more jurisprudence on this issue.

In the interim, owners of famous trademarks outside the United States can rely on the misrepresentation of source doctrine in opposing or canceling federal trademark registrations where there is evidence of actual passing off.



DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.