FMLA Does Not Mandate 'House Arrest'

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact

Several times a year, we receive calls from clients intending to terminate employees absent from work for personal medical reasons as approved under the Family and Medical Leave Act. The employers typically explain that a co-worker sent them social media posts from the absent employee showing them at a vacation locale or otherwise engaged in recreational activities. The employers believe that these posts provide clear evidence of fraudulent use of FMLA time, and they want to terminate the employees on this basis.

These employers are sometimes surprised when we advise them to act carefully before terminating the absent employees on these grounds. Employees are entitled to FMLA leave when a serious health condition incapacitates them from performing their jobs. However, taking vacation or otherwise engaging in activities outside of their homes does not necessarily mean that the employees are engaging in FMLA fraud. As one federal judge put it, FMLA does not require house arrest, meaning that an employee may be incapacitated from working but is medically able to engage in other life activities. In some situations, a terminated employee produces medical information certifying that the activities portrayed in the social media posts were consistent with the doctor’s original diagnosis and work restrictions.

Employers are understandably troubled when a worker who is purportedly too sick or injured to perform their job appears to be using FMLA leave for vacation while their employer and co-workers deal with the fallout from their absence. In many cases, employers can use the social media posts to open an inquiry on whether the employee provided misleading information to support their FMLA leave application. This inquiry can involve a request for medical recertification based on apparent discrepancies between the limitations originally claimed and the employee’s activities while on leave. However, employers should not automatically leap to the conclusion that they have been misled before conducting a full review of the circumstances.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Written by:

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide