FTC Announces Settlement with Education Technology Provider Over Subscription Cancellation Practices

Hudson Cook, LLP
Contact

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • The Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement with an education technology provider alleged to have violated the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA) by failing to provide consumers with a simple mechanism to cancel recurring subscription charges.
  • The company did not admit or deny the allegations. Still, it consented to a permanent injunction and monetary relief totaling $7.5 million and ongoing compliance monitoring.
  • In announcing the case, the Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection emphasized:

"The company's failure to provide simple cancellation mechanisms harmed countless Americans, many of whom continued to be charged after believing they had successfully canceled their subscriptions. As part of our effort to reinvigorate the agency's fraud program, the FTC will continue enforcing ROSCA against online sellers where they violate this important statute."

CASE SUMMARY:

On September 15, 2025, the FTC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against an education technology provider that markets and sells digital and physical textbooks, online study tools, and subscription-based services to high school and college students.

The Commission alleged that for years the company:

  • required subscribers to navigate lengthy, confusing cancellation flows that included multiple screens, surveys, and offers designed to deter cancellation;
  • failed to make cancellation options available on mobile devices, effectively forcing consumers to use desktop computers; and
  • continued to charge consumers after they had completed cancellation steps or even after contacting customer service.

According to the FTC, since October 2020, the company improperly charged nearly 200,000 consumers following attempted cancellations. The stipulated final order resolves these allegations without the company admitting liability. Among other things, the order:

  • requires the company to provide a simple cancellation method that is at least as easy to use as the enrollment mechanism;
  • imposes a $7.5 million monetary judgment, to be used for consumer redress or related relief; and
  • requires ongoing compliance reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring for a period of up to ten years.

RESOURCES:
You can review all of the relevant court filings and press releases at the FTC's Cases and Proceedings page:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Hudson Cook, LLP

Written by:

Hudson Cook, LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Hudson Cook, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide