Georgia Supreme Court Ruling “in tension” with SCOTUS Precedent on Personal Jurisdiction

McGuireWoods LLP
Contact

Many states have statutes establishing that, as a condition of registering to do business in a state, a foreign corporation consents to general personal jurisdiction in that state.  Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014) tightening the scope of the general personal jurisdiction doctrine, lower courts have wrestled with the question of whether these mandatory consent statutes are constitutional and, more broadly, whether registering to do business in a state can be considered consent to general personal jurisdiction in that state.

The Georgia Supreme Court’s September 21st decision in Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. McCall, 220G1368, may be an important development in the law on this front, and is certainly important for any non-Georgia company registered to do business in the state.  In Cooper Tire, the Georgia court directly addressed the question of whether the state’s precedent establishing that registration to do business in the state rendered a foreign corporation subject to general personal jurisdiction in the state survived Daimler and its progeny.  The court found that while that precedent was “in tension” with the Supreme Court’s decisions, it “cannot be overruled on federal constitutional grounds.”  In other words: in Georgia state courts, registration in Georgia means being subject to general personal jurisdiction.

This area of law is ripe for both further Supreme Court and legislative developments.  Corporations registered to do business in multiple states would be well-advised to check those states’ statutes and precedent to determine whether they have consented to general personal jurisdiction by virtue of their registration.  And, if so, whether they want to be another test case in the still-developing case law on the question.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McGuireWoods LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McGuireWoods LLP
Contact
more
less

McGuireWoods LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.