Good News for Taxpayers: California 1031 Exchange Decision

Allen Matkins

The California State Board of Equalization (Board) recently issued a favorable decision in an important Section 1031 exchange case. As an elected body of five members, the Board hears appeals in California tax cases where the taxpayer has not been able to agree or settle with the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB). A hearing before the Board is the last stop in the administrative appeal process. The only recourse a taxpayer has after a Board decision is to pay the tax and go to court to sue for a refund. Generally viewed as an unfriendly venue for taxpayers, it is significant that the Board unanimously held in favor of a group of taxpayers who appealed the disallowance of their Section 1031 exchanges by the FTB.

The FTB has been very aggressive in auditing Section 1031 exchanges and disallowing exchanges involving a "drop and swap" or a "swap and drop." The new Board decision should put the brakes on the FTB's aggressive positions which are not consistent with established federal case law in the 1031 exchange area.

This new decision involved a swap and drop. A group of taxpayers sold properties and exchanged into tenancy-in-common interests in a replacement property (the "swap"). As required by their lender, they contributed their individual co-tenancy interests into a single purpose limited liability company seven months after the exchange (the "drop"). The FTB argued that the drop—this planned roll-up into an LLC—disqualified the 1031 exchange.

Rejecting the arguments of the FTB, the Board held that there was independent significance to the taxpayers' holding the property as co-tenants for seven months. The roll-up of the co-tenancy interests into an LLC was merely a change in the form of ownership which did not disqualify the exchange as the FTB argued.

This decision affects a number of California cases that are currently on appeal. It gives taxpayers and their advisors reason to cheer and will hopefully bring California more in line with the approach which the IRS and federal courts have taken on 1031 exchanges.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.