“GOOGLE” Survives Attempted Genericide

by Finnegan – Incontestable® Blog

On May 16, 2017, the Ninth Circuit affirmed Google Inc.’s summary judgment win in a lawsuit that sought to cancel the GOOGLE mark on the ground it has become generic.

In early 2012, David Elliot registered 763 domain names that included the word “google.”  Google filed and won a UDRP proceeding that found the domains had been registered in bad faith, and ordered transfer of the domains to Google.  Elliot then filed suit in district court, petitioning to cancel the GOOGLE trademark on the ground that the word “google” is primarily understood by the public as a generic term used to describe the act of internet searching.  At summary judgment, Google argued that Elliot had failed to present sufficient evidence to support such a finding.  Elliot, on the other hand, argued that the majority of the relevant public uses “google” as a verb, and verb use constitutes generic use as a matter of law.  The district court sided with Google.

On appeal, the dispute boiled down to the proper inquiry under the “primary significance” test.  According to Elliot, rather than focus on whether the public primarily understands the term “google” as a generic name for internet search engines or as a mark identifying Google’s search engine specifically, the proper inquiry should have been whether the relevant public uses the word “google” as a verb.  The Ninth Circuit disagreed.  The text of the Lanham Act makes clear that “a claim of genericide or genericness must be made with regard to a particular type of good or service,” which Elliot did not do.  This requirement maintains the viability of arbitrary marks as a protectable trademark category; otherwise, even though IVORY is arbitrary as applied to soap, the mark could be cancelled simply because it is generic for products made of elephant tusks.  Further, though not categorically irrelevant, “verb use does not automatically constitute generic use.”  An internet user might use the verb “google” with Google’s search engine or with no search engine in mind.  In short, evidence of generic use in one setting needs to be accompanied “by evidence regarding the primary significance of the mark as a whole.”

Elliot also argued that the district court must have impermissibly weighed the evidence in light of the “sheer quantity” of evidence he had produced to support his claim.  The Ninth Circuit was unpersuaded.  At summary judgment, the district court had drawn the favorable inference that the majority of the public uses the verb “google” to refer to searching the internet without regard to the search engine used.  But this inference alone was insufficient to support a jury finding of genericide.  The court stated: “Even if we assume that the public uses the verb ‘google’ in a generic and indiscriminate sense, this tells us nothing about how the public primarily understands the word itself, irrespective of its grammatical function, with regard to internet search engines.”  Fatally for Elliot, almost all of his evidence related only to the public’s use of “google” as a verb and merely supported the inference already drawn by the court.  By contrast, Google submitted a survey showing that consumers classified “Google” as a brand name, rather than a common name.  The court concluded, “Elliot cannot survive summary judgment based on ‘sheer quantity’ of irrelevant evidence.”

The case is Elliott v.Google, Inc., Case No. 15-15809 (9th Cir.).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Finnegan – Incontestable® Blog | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Finnegan – Incontestable® Blog

Finnegan – Incontestable® Blog on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.