Google's Privilege Claim: A Cautionary Tale

by Miller Canfield

Winnie the Pooh feared the Heffalumps and Woozles that he believed inhabited the Hundred Acre Wood, although he never saw one. There are things that lurk in the woods of e-discovery that lawyers can’t see either…like the Auto-Save. Although unseen, some unfortunate lawyers for corporate giant Google recently felt its bite.

Google and The Auto-Save

In August 2010, Oracle America filed a patent infringement action against Google alleging that Google’s Android smart phone platform infringed certain patents related to Oracle’s Java-based smart phone platform. During the course of discovery, Google produced over 3.7 million electronic documents totaling over 19 million pages to Oracle.

Within this massive amount of produced electronic records were eight draft versions of an email authored by a Google engineer after attending a strategy meeting called by Google’s general counsel regarding Oracle’s claims. The final version of this email included the headings “Attorney Work Product” and “Google Confidential,” and was sent to Google’s senior in-house counsel and a corporate officer and was copied to another Google engineer and the author himself. This final version was withheld from production and appeared on Google’s privilege log. Unfortunately for Google, the eight draft versions did not contain the headings and the recipient names were not yet added. This allowed the drafts to escape detection prior to production.

Where did these drafts come from? The record revealed that during the five minutes it took to draft and send the email, Google’s Gmail email system automatically saved eight “snapshots” of the email and put the copies into the author’s draft email folder. No action was required by the author. It was all done by the Auto-Save.

When Google learned that it had inadvertently produced draft versions of the email to Oracle, it requested that Oracle return all copies. Oracle complied, but filed a motion to compel production of the draft and final versions of the email. Oracle successfully convinced the district court that the email was not protected by any privilege, and the court ordered the production of all versions of the email. Google sought a writ of mandamus to have the district court’s ruling overturned, but the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied the writ. Even though it was ultimately determined that the Google engineer’s email was a non-privileged business communication, there are several significant lessons to be learned from Google’s encounter with the Auto-Save.

Should You Fear the Auto-Save? Ask IT!

As the Google case suggests, in the world of e-discovery, it has become increasingly important to talk to the IT Department before any data is identified, collected, processed, reviewed and produced. Google’s counsel should have interviewed an IT Department representative to learn what features or systems were in place that could impact the discovery process. A series of questions could have been asked to determine how Google’s Gmail system worked. Does the system auto-save drafts?  What happens to the drafts once the final email is sent? Where are the drafts stored? Answers to these questions would have alerted counsel to the possible presence of draft versions of sensitive and potentially privileged emails.

Moreover, these types of questions should be asked for other office productivity software as well. Word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation software also may auto-save drafts or create backup versions of files during editing. Knowing if these features exist and how they operate can provide valuable information that can be used during the e-discovery process. For example, knowing that auto-saved drafts or backups of a privileged or otherwise confidential document may exist, lawyers can then use targeted searches to ferret out the drafts.

It Says It’s Privileged. That’s Enough, Right?

Wrong. It doesn’t matter what labels are placed on the document. A grocery list doesn’t become privileged because you write “Attorney-Client Communication” on it. As the appellate court made clear in the Google case, the contents and context of the communication are determinative when assessing privilege. The court found that the email at issue was a response to a question from Google’s management that addressed business rather than legal matters regardless of how it was labeled internally. That does not mean to suggest that placing privilege labels on documents isn’t helpful. It certainly can be when it comes to identifying possible privileged communications. But again, the privilege analysis cannot end with the label.

But I Sent it to a Lawyer!

The fact that a lawyer is a recipient doesn’t by itself protect the communication from disclosure. Like a privilege label, the fact that a communication was sent to a lawyer standing alone does not render the communication privileged. If it did, every written or electronic communication would include a lawyer’s name, and the truth seeking process would be severely crippled. The appellate court went beyond the “who” and focused on the “what” to determine that the email concerned business not legal matters.

B. Jay Yelton III - 269.383.5819

Kenneth J. Treece - 269.393.5810


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller Canfield | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Miller Canfield

Miller Canfield on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.