Gotham Insurance V. Warren E&P Answers Age-Old Question

by Zelle LLP

In Gotham Insurance Co. v. Warren E&P Inc.,[1] the Texas Supreme Court recently addressed an age-old and often-asked question: Can an insurer recoup money paid to its insured when it later learns it overpaid? The answer: Insurers can only look to the terms of their policies and cannot rely upon claims in equity.

This thorny issue arose out of an oil well explosion and fire that occurred in 1997. The insured, Warren E&P Inc. (Pedeco), entered into a joint venture with two other companies, Warren Resources Inc. (WRI) and Oil Technology Fund (Fund), to drill a series of wells, including the well that blew out in 1997. The parties also entered into a joint operating agreement that covered the blowout well and designated Pedeco as the operator. The agreement determined that Pedeco possessed 12.5 percent cost-bearing working interests, while the WRI and the Fund possessed the remaining interests.

Gotham Insurance Co. insured Pedeco, but not WRI or the Fund. The policy provided coverage for expenses incurred to regain or attempt to regain control of a blown-out well, to the extent of the insured’s working interest. At the time of the loss, Pedeco notified Gotham of the blowout and represented that it was the sole operator and held a 100 percent working interest in the well. This representation was repeated by Pedeco’s insuring agent and on its sworn proof of loss. Based on these representations, Gotham paid claims totaling over $1.8 million to Pedeco.

After it issued payment, Gotham acquired the joint operating agreement through other sources, thereby discovering that Pedeco’s interest in the well was limited. Gotham then inquired of Pedeco whether it had a 100 percent working interest in the well, as previously reported, in light of the joint operating agreement. Pedeco responded that it held 100 percent of the equitable title to the well under a farmout agreement; was the sole performing party under turnkey drilling agreements; would have full liability in the event of a blowout; and paid a premium for its full interest in the well.

In response to this statement, Gotham ceased any further payments under the claim and intervened in an ongoing lawsuit between Pedeco and its subcontractors. Gotham alleged that Pedeco breached the policy by misrepresenting its interest and sought reimbursement of its prior payments under the alternative theories of restitution and unjust enrichment. Gotham also sued WRI and the Fund under equitable recovery theories, alleging that those parties were contractually responsible to pay for the repair costs. Pedeco counterclaimed for breach of the policy.

The claims were addressed on summary judgment and appealed three times. In the first two appeals, the courts concluded that Gotham should prevail on its restitution and unjust enrichment claims because Pedeco had been reimbursed by WRI, and therefore had not suffered a recoverable loss. On remand, the trial court awarded Gotham judgment for over $1.8 million against Pedeco, WRI and the Fund on the basis of Gotham’s equitable claims for restitution and unjust enrichment.

The third appeal was transferred under docket equalization procedures and the court reversed, holding that Gotham was not entitled to equitable rights of reimbursement under Texas law because those rights did not exist under the terms of the policy. The Texas Supreme Court granted a petition for review to resolve the conflict.

The court determined that, under Fortis Benefits v. Cantu,[2] Gotham could not recover its overpayment under theories of equitable recovery if the insurance policy provided a remedy. In Fortis Benefits, the Texas Supreme Court recognized that “‘equity follows the law,’ … [w]here a valid contract prescribes particular remedies or imposes particular obligations, equity generally must yield unless the contract violates public policy.”[3] Here, the court found that the policy provided Gotham with some form of recovery against Pedeco under the due diligence and misrepresentation clauses.

The court specifically found that the due diligence clause required Pedeco “to comply with regulations and industry standards.”[4] Therefore, to the extent that Gotham could show that Pedeco did not use a blowout preventer in accordance with the Texas Railroad Commissions’ regulations of oil well blowout preventers, it could, for example, recover for breach of the policy under the due diligence provision.

The court also found that Gotham could void the policy under the misrepresentation clause if Gotham could prove that Pedeco made a fraudulent or material misrepresentation that misled Gotham into waiving defenses. The court found both clauses were enforceable and not against public policy. Therefore, the court concluded that the policy “addresses the matters at issue, [and] Gotham may not proceed on its equity claim against Pedeco.”[5]

Similarly, the court determined that Gotham’s equitable claims against the co-venturers WRI and the Fund were also barred. Gotham claimed that its payments to Pedeco discharged the co-venturer’s obligations under the joint operating agreement to share in the repair costs for the well. But because the policy “addresses the matter of Gotham seeking a return of payments that benefitted others,”[6] the court determined the policy’s “salvage and recoveries clause and subrogation clause address Gotham’s ability to recover an overpayment that discharged [the co-venturer’s] obligations.”[7] Therefore, the court found that even equitable claims against third-parties may be governed by an insurance policy.[8]

The moral of the Gotham story is that insurers’ claims for overpayment or repayment are limited to the terms of the insurance policy. Therefore, carriers must ensure that their policies are clearly written to address situations where they are entitled to reimbursement.

For example, the Gotham court recognized that some policies in fact have reimbursement clauses, noting “a reimbursement clause may operate to allow an insurer to recover payments previously made even if the insured did not breach the policy. But the absence of a reimbursement clause does not necessarily foreclose an insurer’s ability to recover if the insured has breached the policy. The insurer may still pursue a claim that the insured’s breach proximately caused its damages, which is subject to any applicable defenses and affirmative defenses.”[9]

The court’s implicit result is that unless an insured is found to have breached some other provision of the policy, such as the due diligence or misrepresentation clause, without a reimbursement clause or another clearly written provision, an insurer is now precluded from recovery for a mistaken overpayment under theories of equity. Alternatively, if an insurance policy does not give an insurer any method of recovery by contract against the insured (for reimbursement, breach, or otherwise), an insurer may then use equitable recovery theories.

The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.

[1] Gotham Insurance Co. v. Warren E&P. Inc., 57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 336, 2014 WL 1190049 (Tex. 2014).

[2] Fortis Benefits v. Cantu, 234 S.W.3d 642 (Tex. 2007).

[3] Gotham, 2014 WL 1190049 at *3, citing Fortis Benefits, 234 S.W.3d at 648-49.

[4] Id. at *4.

[5] Id. at *5.

[6] Id.

[7] Id.

[8] Notably, the Court did not dismiss Gotham’s ability to recover outright. Instead, it remanded the contract claims, noting: “[b]ecause several clauses in the policy address these matters, Gotham must proceed on its contract claim and may only rely on its equity claims if it prevails on its misrepresentation theory and elects the remedy of voiding the policy.” Id. at * 8.

[9] Id. at *6 (emphasis added). The Court recognized, “[b” Id.

Texas Law360 - May 28, 2014



DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Zelle LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Zelle  LLP

Zelle LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.