Has Yvanova Lost Its Mojo For Wrongful Foreclosure Plaintiffs?

by Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

In 2016, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corporation caused a lot of excitement among plaintiffs asserting wrongful foreclosure claims and a lot of grief among secured lenders.

In that decision, covered in a prior Money and Dirt post — California Supreme Court:  Borrowers Have Standing to Allege Wrongful Foreclosure Based on Void Assignment of Note — the Court held that borrowers have standing to base wrongful foreclosure claims on void (but not voidable) assignments of the underlying note and deed of trust.

But later decisions by California Courts of Appeal have minimized the impact of Yvanova.


First came Saterbak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, which limited the applicability of Yvanova to only claims based on a completed foreclosure sale (not one that is about to happen).

The court in Saterbak also held that the challenged assignment to a mortgage trust governed by New York law was merely voidable, not void.

Saterbak was covered on Money and Dirt here: Court of Appeal Rules on “Standing to Challenge Foreclosure” Issues Left Unaddressed by Yvanova


Next came Yhudai v. Impac Funding Corp. , in which the court reviewed recent decisions by New York courts squarely addressing the issue of whether technically invalid assignments of notes and deeds of trust into a securitized investment trust governed by New York law were void or merely voidable.

The court held that based on those New York decisions, such assignments were only voidable and could be ratified by the trust’s beneficiaries, and that a borrower — as a stranger to the securitized trust — had no power to declare the assignment void.

Yhudai was covered on Money and Dirt here: Yvanova Post-Script: It’s Not So Easy For Borrowers To Challenge Foreclosure Based on Defective Assignment of a Deed of Trust


And now we have the recent decision by California’s Third District Court of Appeal in Mendoza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

In Mendoza, the factual allegations were similar to the cases described above.  Chase made a loan in 2007, and assigned the note and deed of trust in 2011 to a securitized trust governed by New York law, which had a “cutoff” date several years prior to 2011.  The borrower further alleged that the assignment was “robo-signed” by “an individual who simply signs thousands of property record documents without any legal or corporate authority whatsoever.”  The borrower claimed that since the assignment failed, the ostensible note owner had no right to foreclose.

The trial court sustained the lender’s demurrer, and the Court of Appeal affirmed.

The court emphasized the “narrow” holding of Yvanova, in which the Supreme Court held only that a borrower could allege wrongful foreclosure if a prior assignment was void, but not if the assignment is merely voidable.  The Supreme Court made no ruling as to whether the assignment in that case was void or merely voidable.

The Mendoza decision also emphasized that while courts must accept a plaintiff’s factual allegations as true on demurrer, courts need not accept plaintiff’s legal conclusions.  Thus, while the plaintiff’s allegations regarding the dates and circumstances of the note assignments framed the court’s analysis, the court did not need to accept plaintiff’s conclusion that the assignment was legally void.

After reviewing the recently published case law from New York and other courts (described as a “mountain of authority” against the plaintiff’s position), the court held that the challenged note assignment was merely voidable, that plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the assignment, and therefore plaintiff’s wrongful foreclosure claim failed.


In light of the cases published after Yvanova, both in New York and California, plaintiffs in wrongful foreclosure cases based on an allegedly defective note assignment cannot rely entirely on Yvanova to save their claims.

While some types of assignments may well be void (e.g., fraudulent assignments) and thus susceptible to challenge, an assignment that is defective based on the timing of a trust’s closing date or the fact that it was “robo-signed” is most likely only voidable, and can be ratified by the beneficiary to remove any taint on the foreclosure.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.