HBO Customer Files Antitrust Class Action Against Netflix to Stop Warner Merger

Mogin Law LLP
Contact

Mogin Law LLP

Cites Disney-Hulu prices which jumped 20% after June’s merger.

A Las Vegas HBO Max subscriber has proposed an antitrust class action against Netflix, Inc. in the Northern District of California to block Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD). The suit alleges the merger, valued at $82.7 billion, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in the U.S. subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) market. The named plaintiff says she has never subscribed to Netflix (Fenderlander v. Netflix, No. 5:25-cv-10521, N.D. Calif.).

The complaint references the effects of the Disney–Hulu merger as an example of how consolidation inflates prices. Disney finalized its ownership of Hulu in June by buying Comcast’s remaining 33% stake for $438.7 million, bringing Disney’s total investment to about $9 billion. This allows Disney to integrate Hulu with Disney+ and a forthcoming ESPN streaming service, with Hulu content set to merge into Disney+ in 2026. The Hulu app will be retired.

After taking over Hulu, Disney announced subscription prices would increase just four months later in October. The price for Disney+ with ads increased by $2 to $11.99 per month, or 20%. To subscribe without ads, it increased by $3 to $18.99, a nearly 19% jump. These hikes align with broader industry trends—akin to similar increases by Netflix, Apple TV+, and others.

In her proposed class action against Netflix, the Las Vegas HBO customer invoked Section 16 of the Clayton Act, which allows courts to block anticompetitive mergers. DOJ’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines, she argues, indicate that the resulting market concentration would be “presumed to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.” The plaintiff calls the deal “one of the more audacious horizontal mergers in recent memory,” arguing it would reduce content diversity, stifle innovation, and block new entrants from the market.

This is another in a stream of deals that continue to consolidate and integrate multiple forms of digital content — from movies to games to social media to news — under a handful of global corporations.

Fenderlander v. Netflix

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Mogin Law LLP

Written by:

Mogin Law LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Mogin Law LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide