House Financial Services Committee Votes To Repeal And Replace Dodd-Frank

by King & Spalding

On September 13th, the House Financial Services Committee approved the Financial CHOICE Act of 2016 to repeal and replace key parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law by a largely partisan vote of 30 to 26.  Democrats declined to offer any amendments, and Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) ordered a vote on the bill, H.R. 5983, not long after that became clear.

According to Hensarling, “the Financial CHOICE Act will end taxpayer-funded bailouts of large financial institutions; relieve banks that elect to be strongly capitalized from growth-strangling regulation that slows the economy and harms consumers; impose tougher penalties on those who commit financial fraud; and demand greater accountability from Washington regulators.”

At more than 2,300 pages, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”) represented the most sweeping overhaul of the U.S. banking law in our nation’s history.  Indeed, the legislation revisited every major financial services law passed by Congress since enactment of the National Bank Act in 1864.  In just 14 months, the 111th Congress revamped 140 years of banking law, essentially rewriting a decade’s worth of banking law each month. 

Given both the size and pace of the undertaking, it should come as no surprise that the final product was by no means perfect.  That was clear to many even before Dodd-Frank was enacted, but has become increasingly evident in the wake of an unprecedented 24,000 pages of federal regulation required to implement Dodd-Frank.

Unfortunately for consumers, the enactment of Dodd-Frank has resulted in less choice and higher costs.  It has also resulted in increased compliance costs for small- and medium-size banks that can least afford it.  While Dodd-Frank and its accompanying regulations may have been a boon for lawyers and accountants, the American Bankers Association (“ABA”) contends that 1,708 small banks have closed their doors since Dodd-Frank was enacted – nearly one fourth of the community banks in the United States.  

A culmination of several years of legislative activity, including numerous hearings, the Financial CHOICE Act attempts to address the negative consequences of Dodd-Frank to both consumers and financial institutions as follows:

  • Title I provides for election to be a strongly capitalized, well-managed financial institution by allowing for an “off-ramp” from the post-Dodd-Frank supervisory regime and Basel III capital and liquidity standards for financial institutions that choose to maintain high levels of capital equivalent to a simple 10 percent tangible assets-to-equity ratio.  It would also exempt such banking organizations from final rules implemented under section 165 of Dodd-Frank. 
  • Title II attempts to end “Too Big To Fail” and bank bailouts by repealing the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) to designate non-bank financial companies as systematically important financial institutions (“SIFIs”), and retroactively repeals its previous designations of non-bank financial companies.  It also repeals the FSOC’s authority to designate particular financial activities for heightened prudential standards, which includes the power to mandate that an activity be conducted in a certain way or be prohibited altogether.  Lastly, Title II creates a new chapter of the Bankruptcy Code designed to accommodate the failure of a large, complex financial institution (House-passed H.R. 2947, the Financial Institution Bankruptcy Act of 2016).
  • Title III replaces the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or the “Bureau”) with a five-member “Consumer Financial Opportunity Commission” subject to the normal congressional appropriations process.  It also repeals the CFPB’s authority to ban bank products and services it deems “abusive” and takes away its authority to prohibit arbitration. Finally, Title III proposes to address CFPB enforcement actions, which the Bureau has increasingly used as an alternative to rulemaking, and requires the Bureau to obtain permission before collecting personal information from consumers.  Notably, section 335 of the Financial CHOICE Act also repeals the so-called “Durbin Amendment” which regulates the fees that financial institutions can impose on debit card transactions.
  • Title IV reauthorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Agency”) for a period of five years and attempts to rationalize the Agency’s unwieldy bureaucratic structure.  It also requires the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to harmonize, where applicable, rulemakings, guidance, and other interpretive orders required by Title VII of Dodd-Frank to simplify compliance burdens and improve oversight.  Lastly, it incorporates legislation drafted by the House Committee on Agriculture to reform the CFTC, which received broad new powers over the derivatives markets in Dodd-Frank (H.R. 2289, the Commodity End-User Relief Act).
  • Title V attempts to improve insurance coordination through an independent advocate, while repealing the Federal Insurance Office.
  • Title VI requires that every financial regulation pass a cost-benefit analysis so that stakeholders know how the rule will impact economic growth before it takes effect.  It also subjects all financial regulatory agencies to the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015 (“REINS Act”) and provides for congressional review of federal financial agency rulemaking.  It also repeals the Chevron doctrine requiring judicial deference to agency interpretations by altering the standard of judicial review in the Administrative Procedure Act as it relates to financial regulatory agencies.
  • Title VII addresses Federal Reserve oversight, reform, and modernization by demanding greater accountability and transparency from the Federal Reserve, both in its conduct of monetary policy and its prudential regulatory activity (House-passed H.R. 3189, the Fed Oversight Reform and Modernization Act).
  • Title VIII imposes enhanced penalties for financial fraud and self-dealing and promotes greater transparency and accountability in the civil enforcement process.  It allows the SEC to triple the monetary fines sought in both administrative and civil actions in certain cases where the penalties are tied to the defendant’s illegal profits.  It also increases the maximum criminal fines for individuals and firms that engage in insider trading and other corrupt practices.
  • Title IX repeals the Volcker Rule and other provisions that limit capital formation.
  • Title X includes a number of provisions intended to help encourage small businesses, foster innovation, and accelerate access to capital.  It incorporates more than two dozen Committee- or House-passed capital formation bills, including the Retail Investor Protection Act (H.R. 1090), the Small Business Capital Formation Enhancement Act (H.R. 4168), the Helping Angels Lead Our Startups Act (H.R. 4498), the Fix Crowdfunding Act (H.R. 4855), and the Fair Access to Investment Research Act (H.R. 5019).
  • Lastly, Title XI provides regulatory relief for “Main Street” by incorporating more than two dozen regulatory relief bills for community financial institutions, including the Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act (H.R. 1941), the Taking Account of Institutions with Low Operational Risk Act (H.R. 2896), the Portfolio Lending and Mortgage Access Act (H.R. 1210), and the Financial Institution Customer Protection Act (H.R. 766), among others.

With introduction of the Financial CHOICE Act, Chairman Hensarling has proven himself to be a serious and thoughtful lawmaker.  While there is general industry support for the legislation, the ABA has expressed some concern regarding provisions in Title I that would allow banks to escape certain regulations should they agree to meet higher capital requirements.  In addition, the retail industry continues to oppose repeal of the Durbin Amendment regulating the fees financial institutions can impose on debit card transaction.  

While Committee passage of the Financial CHOICE Act is likely the high water mark for the bill this year, it will undoubtedly serve as important blueprint for financial regulatory reform in the next Congress.  Moreover, it is quite possible that some of the bipartisan provisions that have previously passed the House of Representatives could find themselves incorporated within a year-end omnibus appropriations bill, similar to what occurred during the lame duck session of the last Congress. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.