Illinois Appellate Court Decides Two FOIA Cases on Fees that Public Body Can Charge and Justification for Attorneys’ Fees

by Franczek Radelet P.C.

[author: Maria Mazza]

In two recent decisions, the Illinois Appellate Court clarified the fees that a public body can charge for copying records pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and the circumstances justifying the imposition of attorneys’ fees and penalties against a public body.

In Sage Information Services v. Humm, the Illinois Appellate Court considered a request made pursuant to the FOIA to the chief county assessment officer for “the current real property assessment record file for the entire county…for a copy, on CD or similar electronic media.” Humm agreed to email the requested records upon receipt of the amount of $1,609.40, pursuant to section 9-20 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/9-20) which permits the assessor to charge a reasonable fee beyond actual costs for the copying of property records.

The Appellate Court considered Section 6 of the FOIA, which authorizes public bodies to charge fees, and found that the FOIA clearly expresses the intent that public bodies can only charge the cost of the electronic medium. Section 6 of the FOIA provides that with respect to electronic records “[a] public body may charge the requester for the actual cost of purchasing the recording medium. A public body may not charge the requester for the cost of any search for and review of the records or other personnel costs associated with reproducing the records.”

The trial court, which held in favor of the public body, erroneously relied upon the previous version of Section 6, which authorized a fee in excess of the cost of copying paper or electronic records, where another statute so provided, according to the Appellate Court. The Appellate Court held that the current version of Section 6 of the FOIA expressly provides that in the case of electronic records, statutory fees relating to paper copies are not applicable. Thus, the Appellate Court held that the FOIA did not justify the imposition of fees in excess of the cost of the electronic medium used to store the requested records. In so holding, the Appellate Court noted that allowing a substantial fee, such as the one public body attempted to impose, would constitute a restraint on access to information, which would be contrary to the FOIA’s legislative intent.

In Rock River Times v Rockford Public School District 205, a school district denied a newspaper’s request under the FOIA for certain records based on the personal privacy exemption and records prohibited from disclosure under the Personnel Record Review Act.

The PAC reviewed the denial and found that the exemptions were inapplicable. The school district then claimed that the records were exempt because they involved a public body’s adjudication of an employee grievance or disciplinary case. The school district, however, subsequently released the record after the newspaper filed suit to compel release of the record.

At the circuit court level, the newspaper pursued attorneys’ fees. After the PAC’s decision, the school district argued that the newspaper was not entitled to attorneys’ fees because the school district had voluntarily released the letter. The current version of the attorneys’ fees provision contained in Section 11(i) of the FOIA provides that “[i]f a person seeking the right to inspect or receive a copy of a public record prevails in a proceeding under this Section, the court shall award such person reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.” (Emphasis added). Prior to amendments to the FOIA, the attorneys’ fees provisions provided that “[i]f a person seeking the right to inspect or receive a copy of a public record substantially prevails in a proceeding under this Section, the court may award such person reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.” (Emphasis added).

The Appellate Court noted that prior to the amendment to the FOIA, case law established that the phrase “substantially prevails” applied where the plaintiff succeeded without court involvement. Thus, the Appellate Court interpreted the deletion of the word “substantially” as the legislature’s intent to change the law and require court-ordered relief. Accordingly, the Appellate Court held that the newspaper was not entitled to attorneys’ fees because the school district released the letter prior to an order of relief.

The Appellate Court next considered whether imposing sanctions against the school district was appropriate. Section 11(j) of the FOIA provides that a public body that willfully and intentionally fails to comply with FOIA or acts in bad faith may be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500 or more than $5,000. The Appellate Court found that the school district acted in bad faith by attempting to raise a third exemption, after the first two had been rejected, and by basing its release of the record on an alleged oral opinion of the PAC, that was later contradicted by the PAC.

These cases provide helpful interpretations on amended provisions under the FOIA. The Humm decision makes clear that with respect to electronic records a public body can only charge costs for the electronic medium used. The Rock River Times decision clarifies that an actual court ruling is necessary in order to succeed on a claim for attorneys’ fees under the FOIA, but that civil penalties may still be assessed.


Written by:

Franczek Radelet P.C.

Franczek Radelet P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.