Impact of the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby Stores Decision

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

On June 30, 2014, in Hobby Lobby Stores, the Supreme Court held that corporations are persons for purposes of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) and, as a result, if a corporation has a sincerely held religious belief, the federal government implementation of laws must be done through the least restrictive means. The Court indicated that the scope of its opinion was limited; that it was unlikely that publicly traded corporations would be able to assert a religious freedom claim and that there was no evidence that it may be applied to other medical procedures such as vaccinations and blood transfusions. Nevertheless, before an employer acts on the decision, for the reasons outlined below the employer should carefully weigh such action.


Section 2713 of the Public Health Services Act (PHSA), as added by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), requires that group health plans and insurers provide certain preventive services without imposing any cost-sharing. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) interpreted this requirement to include contraceptive coverage for women. This requirement was generally effective January 1, 2013 for calendar year health plans. HHS, however, issued regulations providing an exception for certain religious employers. 45 C.F.R. §147.131(a). The regulations also provided an accommodation for religious nonprofit corporations with an objection to the contraceptive coverage requirement. 45 C.F.R. §147.131(b)&(c). If such organization has an insured health plan, the insurer has the responsibility for satisfying the requirement. If the organization has a self-insured health plan, the third-party administrator (TPA) for the health plan has the responsibility for satisfying the requirement.

A number of organizations challenged the requirement, including several closely-held for-profit corporations. In Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. HHS, the Third Circuit held that a for-profit corporation did not have a basis under RFRA to challenge the requirement. 724 F.3d 377 (3rd Cir. 2013). In contrast, in Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, the Tenth Circuit found RFRA protected a for-profit employer. 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013). This split led to the review by the Court.

The Court’s Decision

The Court, in a 5-4 decision, held in Hobby Lobby Stores that corporations with sincerely held religious beliefs did not need to satisfy the contraceptive coverage requirement because the requirement was not being imposed in the least restrictive means. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., No. 13-354, 2014 WL 2921709. The Court began its decision by concluding that corporations are persons for purposes of RFRA. Id. at 19-20. The Court noted in a number of places that the corporations at issue in the case are closely-held corporations and that it seems unlikely that publicly traded corporations will often assert RFRA claims. Id. at 29. Finally, the Court concluded the requirement was not being imposed in the least restrictive means and noted the accommodation provided to nonprofit organizations as an example of this. Id. at 43. Based on this, the Court concluded that the federal government could not impose the contraceptive coverage requirement on the closely-held corporations named in the case. The dissent raised a number of concerns, including whether corporations owned by individuals who object to vaccinations and blood transfusions based on their religious beliefs may challenge any requirement that a health plan provide these benefits to employees. The Court's decision is available here.

Points to Consider Before Acting on the Decision

Although the Hobby Lobby Stores decision has received much attention, before acting on the decision an employer should carefully consider a number of points.


The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) generally applies to employer health plans (excluding governmental and non-electing church health plans). Notwithstanding the Court’s decision, it is unclear whether employers wishing to exclude contraceptive coverage from their health plans will face additional objections. Notably, the Hobby Lobby Stores case arose in the context of government enforcement of large tax penalties, not claims for benefits by individual plan participants. Also, it is possible that new regulations could extend to closely-held for-profit corporations the regulations currently requiring insurers and TPAs to provide contraception coverage for religious nonprofit corporations that object to the requirement. It may be difficult to judge the practical effect of Hobby Lobby Stores until the regulatory dust settles. However, at a minimum, an employer that wishes to follow the decision would have to demonstrate as a factual matter that the employer fits within the framework established by the case (i.e., that the owners have sincerely held religious beliefs and that the requirement was not being imposed in the least restrictive means).


The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was amended by the ACA to add a whistleblower protection for employees reporting violations of the ACA. See 29 U.S.C. § 218C (FLSA § 18C). It is possible that an employee may challenge the exclusion of contraceptive coverage as a violation of the ACA and this could lead to a review the employer’s action. An employee might also bring suit based on this.

State Law

If an employer has an insured health plan, that health plan is subject to state law mandates. These state mandates are not preempted by ERISA (unlike under a self-insured health plan, where state law mandates are preempted). If state law mandates the health plan provide contraceptive coverage, the employer would need to assess the state law.

Looking Forward

It is likely HHS will review the decision and issue new guidance. However, the direction and timing of the guidance is not clear.

It is worth noting the Court stated in Hobby Lobby Stores that the decision should not be read as permitting discrimination on the basis of a protected status, such as race. The majority rejected the dissent’s concern that the decision could be used in this manner. The majority explained that the federal government has a compelling interest in permitting equal opportunity in the workplace and that prohibitions on discrimination are precisely tailored to achieve that goal. Thus, the decision signals that these arguments should not be accepted.

An employer considering the impact of the decision should watch for further guidance.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.