In re Lear: Litigants Enjoined from Pursuing Pre-Plan Effective Date Antitrust Claims

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

On February 10, 2012, Judge Allan L. Gropper of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that certain plaintiffs alleging antitrust violations against Lear Corporation and its reorganized debtor affiliates (i) hold “claims” that are enjoined to the extent they arose before the effective date of the reorganized debtors’ plan, (ii) are entitled to pursue their alleged post-effective date claims against the reorganized debtors, and (iii) are not precluded from seeking permission to file late proofs of claims and to have those claims afforded class status.  In re Lear Corp., No. 09-14326 (ALG), 2012 WL 443951 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2012).  In addition to reaffirming the legal limits of a discharge under a confirmed plan of reorganization, this decision recognizes the (likely remote) possibility that class claims may proceed in the bankruptcy context.


A purported representative of certain antitrust plaintiffs commenced a class action lawsuit against the reorganized debtors on October 5, 2011, nearly two years after the effective date of the reorganized debtors’ plan (November 9, 2009), alleging that the reorganized debtors had participated in a price-fixing conspiracy since January 1, 2000.  This class action was one of forty-four similar antitrust lawsuits that were transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.  In response to the complaint, the reorganized debtors filed a motion requesting entry of an order enforcing the discharge provisions of their confirmed plan and a dismissal of the complaint.


The Court first determined that certain of the antitrust plaintiff’s causes of action are “claims,” as defined by the Bankruptcy Code, subject to the discharge provisions of the reorganized debtors’ plan, as they alleged rights to payment that, in at least some instances, arose prior to the effective date.  The antitrust plaintiffs made no effort to refute this determination, and instead argued that the reorganized debtors’ discharge under their plan was subject to the antitrust plaintiffs’ constitutional right to notice, and that they received inadequate notice of the reorganized debtors’ bankruptcy cases and claims bar dates.  The Court refused to rule on the adequacy of the antitrust plaintiffs’ notice, finding that notice was a separate question from the issue of whether the antitrust plaintiffs held claims.

In addition, the Court found that the notice issue was not ripe, and that the proper recourse for a claimant asserting a lack of adequate notice of a claims bar date would ordinarily be to seek permission to file a late proof of claim.  The Court also determined, in reliance on the Fourth Circuit’s recent decision in the recent decision in Gentry v. Siegel, — F.3d —-, 2012 WL 310870 (4th Cir. 2012), which we discussed in an earlier post, that the named antitrust plaintiffs lacked standing to assert the due process rights of a class that has not yet been certified.  Accordingly, the Court held that this decision did not bar the antitrust plaintiffs from moving to file late proofs of claim and seeking to prosecute such claims as class actions.  In so holding, however, the Court noted that other courts, including the Third Circuit, had rejected similar insufficient notice arguments in recent decisions.

The Court next determined that the reorganized debtors’ plan did not discharge any of the antitrust plaintiff’s causes of action that arose after the effective date of the plan, stating that “a debtor is responsible for the consequences of its actions after it emerges from chapter 11, and if bankruptcy law discharges a liability, but the debtor takes new action and incurs a similar liability after receiving its discharge, there may be no entitlement to an injunction against prosecution of the latter.”  2012 WL 443951, at *10.  Thus, the Court held that the reorganized debtors’ potential liability for post-effective date conduct is a determination for the district court adjudicating the consolidated antitrust actions.

This decision reaffirms the enforceability of a confirmed plan of reorganization’s discharge provisions over pre-effective date claims, and that such provisions cannot shield a reorganized debtor from liability for actions taken during the post-confirmation period.  In addition, while the Court left open the possibility for the antitrust claimants to file late proofs of claim and seek class treatment of those claims, the Court hinted that such relief would be denied because the notice of the claims bar dates provided by the debtors was likely constitutionally adequate.  Furthermore, because the inherent characteristics of the bankruptcy claims adjudication process disfavor class claims and the application of class action procedures, as discussed in the Gentry v. Siegel decision, the odds that these antitrust litigants could pursue class claims in the bankruptcy court are remote.

This entry was posted in Claims.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.