Intel case will mean more lawsuits

Ary Rosenbaum

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

In a unanimous decision in the Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma case, the Supreme Court refused to limit the timeframe in which participants could bring a lawsuit challenging the investment decisions made by plan fiduciaries. While ERISA provides only a three-year statute of limitations when participants have “actual knowledge” of an alleged breach or violation, the Court opined that this shorter period isn’t applicable when the participant in question didn’t read or didn’t recall having read all the relevant information about the investments provided by the plan. In those situations, the Court ruled that a longer six-year statute of limitations applies. This decision opens employers and retirement plan fiduciaries up to an increased risk of litigation while increasing the standard for evaluating breach claims and class action certifications.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ary Rosenbaum, The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ary Rosenbaum

The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.