ITC Grants Leave for Complainant to Personally Serve Foreign Respondents

Jones Day
Contact

Jones Day

In a recent order, ALJ Cheney granted leave for Complainant to personally serve certain foreign Respondents because the ITC was unable to successfully serve those Respondents.  See In re Certain Child Carriers and Components Thereof, INV. No. 337-TA-1154, Order No. 8 (May 3, 2019) (“Order”).  We have previously discussed the ease with which service of process can be accomplished against foreign Respondents at the ITC (here).

On March 6, 2019, LILLEbaby LLC (“LILLEbaby”) filed a complaint requesting the ITC to investigate twenty-seven domestic and foreign companies for allegedly infringing its patents related to child carriers.  Upon institution of the investigation, the ITC successfully served all but three Respondents – BabySwede LLC (“BabySwede”), Wuxi Kangarouse Trading Co. Ltd. Enterprises d/b/a Kangarouse (“Kangarouse”), and Quanzhou Mingrui Bags Co. Ltd. (“Mingrui”).  Kangarouse and Mingrui are foreign entities.

LILLEbaby subsequently filed a motion for leave to effect personal service of the complaint and notice of investigation on the three Respondents, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.11(b).  In relevant part, Rule 210.11(b) provides that “a complainant may attempt to effect personal service of the complaint and notice of investigation upon a respondent, if the Secretary’s efforts to serve the respondent have been unsuccessful.”

In their motion, LILLEbaby explained that the ITC’s attempted service on the three Respondents was unsuccessful and that the complaint identified the best known address for the three Respondents based on a reasonable investigation and publically available information.  ALJ Cheney granted LILLEbaby’s request for leave based on LILLEbaby’s representations.

Takeaway

As we have previously highlighted, service at the ITC can be much less cumbersome than in a district court.  This order is a reminder that even in situations where the ITC cannot successfully serve a foreign entity, Complainants may utilize the Rule 210.11(b) to personally serve Respondents.  The ability to personally serve such Respondents is another advantage of bringing a dispute to the ITC.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jones Day | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Jones Day
Contact
more
less

Jones Day on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide