It’s The Real Deal: California Court Finds Trade Secret Protection For Ideas

by Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Contact’s a small-time Silicon Valley inventor’s worst nightmare: he shops his technology to a large multi-national company, but the company declines to implement his idea as pitched.  Instead, the multi-national company turns around and slaps its own name on the inventor’s concept, and even files its own patents covering that idea.  Of course, the technology giant also fails to give our unfortunate inventor any credit or compensation.

Maybe you think the inventor first should have filed for his own patent before pitching his technology.  Perhaps.  Or, suggests a recent decision of the California Court of Appeal, maybe trade secret law offers an independent solution to his dilemma.  In Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta Systems Laboratory Inc., the California Court of Appeal held that ideas can be protectable as trade secrets.  Accordingly, it affirmed a substantial damages award to Altavion, whose concepts for a digital stamping technology (DST) had been misappropriated by defendant KMSL, a research and development subsidiary of multifunction peripheral (MFP) device manufacturer Konica Minolta Business Technologies.

KMSL had previously considered employing DST into a new MFP technology that KMSL was developing that was designed to self-authenticate printed documents.  As part of negotiations for a proposed business partnership that would develop this new technology, KMSL received extensive confidential disclosures relating to DST from Altavion pursuant to a Non-Disclosure Agreement the parties entered into. Ultimately, the business negotiations between Altavion and KMSL broke down, and KMSL elected not to pursue the business partnership.  Instead, KMSL proceeded to develop its own DST solution. KMSL also continued to file for patents encompassing Altavion’s DST, which it had begun to do even as the parties were still talking – in total, KMSL filed 24 DST patent applications and obtained 8 patents. Altavion was not pleased when it discovered those patent filings, and it sued KMSL for misappropriation of trade secrets in San Mateo County Superior Court.  Altavion prevailed, receiving $1,513,400 in combined damages and prejudgment interest.   The company also received more than $3 million in attorney fees, as well as expert fees and costs.  KMSL then appealed.

KMSL argued that the mere concept of DST did not qualify for trade secret protection.  However, the Court of Appeal pointedly disagreed.  After comparing and contrasting trade secret law and patent law, the Court of Appeal concluded that “if a patentable idea is kept secret, the idea itself can constitute information protectable by trade secret law.”  This was not at odds, the Court said, with the distinction drawn in Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp. between patent protection for an idea and trade secret protection for a fact.  Instead, secret ideas could fall under the definition of “information” in California Civil Code § 3426.1, subdivision (d).

Applying that conclusion to the facts, the Court of Appeal divided the information at issue in the case into three tiers of specificity and secrecy.  The least specific, and hence least secret, level of information was Altavion’s general idea of a barcode for creating “self-authenticating” documents and detecting alterations.  The next step down included the design concepts underlying Altavion’s DST.  And, most specific and most secret, were Altavion’s algorithms and source code.  Although algorithms and source code were unquestionably protectable as trade secrets, that information could not form the basis of Altavion’s trade secrets claim because Altavion had never shared that information with KMSL.

The court thus analyzed whether Altavion’s design concepts qualified for trade secret protection.  KMSL again sought to rely on the Silvaco case, but the court found that Silvaco, while drawing a distinction between source code and software design concepts, only held that design was not a trade secret “to the extent the design elements are disclosed and evident to the end user.”  Because Altavion had disclosed its design concepts only to KMSL, and that disclosure was subject to a NDA, Silvaco did not preclude a misappropriation claim.  In addition, there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Altavion’s design concepts had independent economic value from being kept secret.  The court further found that Altavion’s presentations to third parties did not undermine the finding that the secrecy had been maintained, because Altavion’s presentations only disclosed its general DST concept, not the underlying design details.

In sum, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s finding that KMSL misappropriated Altavion’s trade secrets, which constituted specific design concepts that Altavion had identified, as well as Altavion’s DST concept as a whole (being a combination of those elements).  The court also affirmed the award of a reasonable royalty, based on the trial court’s finding that neither Altavion’s actual loss nor KMSL’s unjust enrichment was unprovable.  Finally, the Court of Appeal affirmed the award of prejudgment interest and attorney fees.

The Altavion opinion offers a cautionary tale to those who, without compensation, seek to appropriate potentially valuable ideas disclosed in confidential business negotiations.  Indeed, the opinion underscores the wisdom of economist John Maynard Keynes, who once observed:  “The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones….”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.