By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Dr. Laskhmi Arunachalam v. Citigroup Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-373-RGA (D.Del. December 4, 2020), the Court denied the motion of plaintiff to reconsider its prior order dismissing all counts of the complaint with prejudice.  The order in question held that plaintiff could not assert patent claims previously declared invalid; plaintiff was collaterally estopped from asserting the remaining clams based on the ruling of another district court which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals; and plaintiff was collaterally estopped from arguing that she was not collaterally estopped.  Id. at *1.  Given it did not find any intervening change in the law, new evidence, or clear error of law, the Court denied the motion to reconsider.  Id. at *2.

A copy of the Memorandum Order is attached.

[View source.]