July 2013: Structured Finance Litigation Update - New York’s Evolving Reasonable Reliance Standard.

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Among the more hotly contested issues facing structured finance investors and insurers bringing fraud claims in New York is the requirement that plaintiffs establish that they reasonably relied upon the alleged fraudulent misrepresentations. Commonly, the first defense of banks or other defendants in such suits is to seek dismissal of the claims on the ground that, regardless of any misrepresentation they may have made, the plaintiff’s reliance was not reasonable because the truth could have been ascertained on the basis of due diligence conducted at the time of the investment. Given the large amount of information that was theoretically—but often not practically—available to investors or insurers in structured finance transactions, this standard has presented an unfair and insurmountable bar in some cases. But that standard may be changing. The New York State Supreme Court (Justice Bransten), recently held in MBIA v. Countrywide that an insurer is not required to meet a “reasonable reliance” standard to show that it would not have issued a policy. In addition, two recent appellate decisions from the First Department have suggested some softening and clarification of New York’s reasonable reliance standard.

First, in CIFG Assurance North American v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., the plaintiff insurer, CIFG claimed that Goldman Sachs fraudulently induced it to provide guaranty insurance on an RMBS securitization by misleading CIFG as to the quality and origination of the mortgage loans backing the securitization. The lower court dismissed the fraud claims on the pleadings reasoning that CIFG could not show reasonable reliance because it failed to review the underlying mortgage loans. On appeal, however, the First Department recently reversed the trial court’s decision. See CIFG Assur. N. Am., Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., — N.Y.S.2d —, 2013 WL 1876243 (1st Dep’t May 7, 2013). In reinstating the fraud claims, the First Department found that the alleged misrepresentations concerning the characteristics of the underlying loans “were not demonstrably known by plaintiff to be false when made.” Id. at *1. It thus concluded that the plaintiff “was not required, as a matter of law, to audit or sample the underlying loan files” and that whether CIFG’s reliance on Goldman Sachs’ representations was reasonable was a question of fact, precluding dismissal. Id.

Second, in ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., the plaintiff insurer, ACA, alleged that it was fraudulently induced by Goldman Sachs to issue a financial guaranty on CDO notes on the basis of misrepresentations that a hedge fund, Paulson & Co. (“Paulson”), that was involved in selecting the CDO’s collateral was taking a long position through investing in the CDO’s equity when in fact it was short. In a 3-2 decision, the First Department affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of ACA’s claim. See ACA Fin. Guar. Corp. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., — N.Y.S.2d —, 2013 WL 1953751 (1st Dep’t May 14, 2013). The Court reasoned that ACA could not have reasonably relied on Goldman’s alleged misrepresentation because the deal’s offering materials disclosed that “no-one was investing in the first-loss tranche” of the CDO and that, despite this fact, ACA failed either to investigate Paulson’s role or to include in its guaranty policy an “appropriate prophylactic provision to ensure against the possibility of misrepresentation.” ACA, 2013 WL 1953751, at *1-2. While seemingly in tension with the CIFG decision only one week prior, the ACA decision can be reconciled with CIFG in that the Court in ACA took note of ‘red flags’ that it concluded triggered heightened duties of investigation which the Court in CIFG expressly found did not exist in that case. In any event, the ACA decision included an unusual and vigorous dissent by two of the Court’s justices which makes it likely that the case will be reviewed by the New York Court of Appeals, which may very well reverse on grounds that the decision sets too high a threshold for showing reasonable reliance, even in the face of arguable ‘red flags.’

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.