July 2014: Copyright Litigation Update

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Courts Take More Expansive View of Copyright Fair Use. Due to increasing globalization and constant advances in technology, there exists today an unprecedented level of access to copyrightable material, which in turn has led to an ever-evolving copyright landscape. Today, for example, a television show broadcast in the United Kingdom might be watched online in the United States minutes later; an artist might sell her prints around the world through a virtual store; and a recorded audio sound bite from a company’s stockholder meeting might go viral within milliseconds.

While the Copyright Act provides robust protection to authors to help prevent unauthorized copying of their works, Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use” of a copyrighted work, such as copying “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching … , scholarship, or research, is not an infringement.” 17 U.S.C. § 107. In determining whether a use is fair, courts often focus on the first statutory factor: “the purpose and character of the use,” id. § 107(1)—that is, whether the work is being used in a different manner or for a different purpose from the original, and thus is “transformative.” Two recent cases demonstrate how the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is adopting an increasingly expansive view of the type of uses that are likely to be considered fair.

Last year, in Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013), Prince, an “appropriation artist,” incorporated photographer Cariou’s copyrighted photographs into his own art by tearing the photographs out of a book, pinning them onto pieces of plywood, and altering them in various ways—from merely painting over facial features to largely obscuring the photos themselves. Id. at 699-700. In responding to Cariou’s allegations of copyright infringement, Prince claimed that his uses of the photographs were protected as transformative fair uses. The Second Circuit largely agreed, ruling that most of Prince’s uses were transformative, and thus fair, because he employed “an entirely different aesthetic from Cariou’s photographs,” and his “composition, presentation, scale, color palette, and media are fundamentally different and new compared to the photographs.” Id. at 706.

In finding Prince’s use transformative, the court clarified two important aspects of fair-use analysis. First, the court held that the “law imposes no requirement that a [secondary] work comment on the original or its author in order to be considered transformative,” and that the universe of fair uses is not limited to the examples in the preamble of Section 107. Id. Second, the court ruled that whether a use is transformative is based not on the secondary user’s subjective intent, but rather on how the work “may ‘reasonably be perceived’” by the public—that is, an objective test. Id. at 707. Both of these clarifications serve to broaden the potential universe of acceptable fair use. A secondary use need not make any comment on the original, or even be created with a fair-use intent; rather, any alteration to the expressive content or message of a work, whether intended by the secondary author or not, may be transformative.

Earlier this year, the Second Circuit further expanded the universe of potential fair uses when it found a commercial, non-transformative use to be fair. In Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P., 742 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2014), amended by --- F.3d ---, 2014 WL 2219162 (2d Cir. May 30, 2014), privately-held media company Bloomberg obtained an unauthorized sound recording of a Swatch Group investor meeting and distributed it to its paying subscribers. Swatch Group alleged that Bloomberg’s dissemination of the sound recording infringed its copyright, while Bloomberg claimed that the dissemination was protected as fair use. The court began by noting that Bloomberg’s purpose “was to make important financial information about Swatch Group available to investors and analysts,” and that “such public dissemination of financial information serves this public purpose in the nature of news reporting,” one of the examples enumerated in Section 107 as consistent with fair use. Id. at *6. Further, the court found that “regardless of how transformative the use is,” the first factor favored fair use for two reasons. Id. at *9. First, “copying the exact spoken performance of Swatch Group’s executives was reasonably necessary to convey their full meaning,” thereby serving “the interest of accuracy, not privacy.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Second, copying “to communicate factual information … in no way diminished Swatch Group’s ability to communicate with analysts, and thus caused no harm to Swatch’s copyright interests.” Id. This ruling further clarifies the important role of fair use in copyright jurisprudence. Even where a secondary use may be commercial and nontransformative, and copies the original in its entirety, it may nonetheless be protected as fair use where an important public purpose is implicated.

Together, these cases suggest that the Second Circuit is moving toward broader acceptance of uses as fair, recognizing that strong copyright protections must give way to legitimate secondary uses that are in the public interest.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.