Key Regulatory Topics: Weekly Update, 3-9 August 2018

Allen & Overy LLP
Contact

Allen & Overy LLP

Allen & Overy publish weekly updates on key regulatory topics affecting the financial services sector. If you would like to receive this update by email and be added to our marketing mailing list please contact RegulatoryChange@allenovery.com

BREXIT 

Draft Short Selling (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

On 9 August, HMT published a draft version of the Short Selling (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 and an explanatory information document. The draft Regulations will amend the SSR, Commission Delegated Regulation 918/2012 supplementing the SSR, and Part 8A of FSMA (which implemented parts of the SRR in the UK), to address areas of retained EU law which would not otherwise operate effectively, and other deficiencies arising from the UK's withdrawal from the EU. Regulation 1 of the draft Regulations will come into force on the day after the day on which the draft Regulations are made. The other provisions will come into force on exit day. HMT intends to lay the draft Regulations before Parliament in the autumn.
Read more

FCA Dear CEO letter on cross-border booking arrangements

On 8 August, the FCA published a Dear CEO letter on cross-border booking arrangements. In the letter, the FCA explains that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU has resulted in firms needing to put in place contingency plans which, when executed, will impact current business models, legal entity strategies and booking arrangements. It appreciates the information firms have already provided on their plans, and reminds firms of the importance of continuing to provide all necessary information. Firms should not take decisions without speaking to the FCA first. The FCA has an important statutory objective relating to the integrity of UK financial markets. The duties it has gained from implementation of EU directives and regulations will continue, as will its responsibility for conduct of business in financial markets. As the FCA has stated publicly, it does not intend to restrict market access using regulatory or supervisory tools. This approach would be inconsistent with its objectives. It would result in a fragmented market, costs being imposed on clients, and increased risk of financial instability. Firms expanding their presence elsewhere in the EU must ensure that the structures put in place enable the FCA to supervise the conduct of their UK business effectively. They must also ensure continued compliance with the FCA's Threshold Conditions. When designing the structures, firms should assess whether the proposed changes are in clients' best interests. The FCA is aware that some EU supervisors have set out specific business model requirements. The FCA is open to a broad range of legal entity structures or booking models. This includes those making use of back-to-back and remote booking, providing the associated conduct risks are effectively controlled and managed. Its starting point is not to restrict business models, but to understand the principles and practices involved, and how the conduct risks arising from them are managed. The FCA sets out in the letter six principles that booking models should comply with. The FCA expects UK boards and senior managers to ensure that effective governance is in place to identify and mitigate the potential harm that could arise from modified booking arrangements. Firms should also be able to demonstrate how the principles have been observed and implemented. For dual-regulated firms, the FCA explains that this approach is consistent with the PRA's established approach to booking practices. It continues to liaise closely with the PRA in the context of EU withdrawal work.
Read more

FMLC report on legal uncertainty arising in context of robustness of financial contracts after Brexit

On 6 August, the FMLC published a report on issues of legal uncertainty arising in the context of the robustness of financial contracts after Brexit. The FMLC has considered whether, in the context of a hard Brexit, the performance of existing financial contracts would continue, or whether Brexit would make their performance illegal, impractical or impossible in some way. The report sets out the FMLC's in-depth analysis of this issue. It highlights the legal uncertainty that will arise if there is no clarity as to the future of the UK/EU relationship post-Brexit. The analysis focuses on existing contracts, although the FMLC notes some of the points raised may be equally relevant to new contracts concluded after exit day. The analysis also exclusively concerns contractual rights and obligations, although the FMLC recognises that the performance of services and activities relating to financial contracts are integral to the assessment of business continuity. For the most part, the FMLC finds that it agrees with the EC's July communication. It considers it unlikely that Brexit will give rise to issues of contractual continuity in a general sense, so far as it is a matter of English law and jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the FMLC has explored the potential consequences to all concerned, including clients and markets, where authorisations are lost without adequate alternatives. It has also examined some of the ways in which the identified issues might be mitigated by firms themselves and through legislative action, including within an agreement between the UK and the EU.
Read more

FINANCIAL CRIME

Services procurement guidelines for ECB's TIBER-EU framework

On 7 August, the ECB published the TIBER-EU framework: services procurement guidelines. The EU framework for the TIBER-EU is the first EU-wide framework for controlled and bespoke tests against cyber-attacks in the financial sector. In summary, the framework allows national authorities and financial services institutions to establish a programme to test and improve firms' resilience against sophisticated cyber-attacks. To ensure a controlled and safe test, one prescribed control is the use of specialist external TI and RT providers that have the requisite experience in threat intelligence and red team testing in financial services. Such external providers also bring a fresh and independent perspective and are likely to have more resources and up-to-date skills to deploy. The guidelines are an integral part of the TIBER-EU framework and detail the different elements of TIBER-EU procurement. They are divided into three parts that: (i) set out the requirements and standards that must be met by the TI and RT providers to deliver recognised TIBER-EU tests; (ii) offer guiding principles and selection criteria for entities as they look to procure services from prospective providers; and (iii) provide questions and agreement checklists that could be used when entities undertake their due diligence and look to formalise the procurement process with TI and RT providers. The guidelines are directed at national and EU authorities responsible for the adoption, implementation and management of the framework, entities looking to undertake TIBER-EU tests, organisations interested in providing cyber threat intelligence services under TIBER-EU, organisations interested in providing red team testing services under TIBER-EU, and accreditation and certification providers.
Read more

FUND REGULATION

ESMA responds to EIOPA questions on AIFMD interpretation

On 7 August, ESMA published a letter (dated 25 July) from Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, to Gabriel Bernardino, EIOPA Chair, on issues relating to the interpretation of AIFMD. The letter responds to questions raised by EIOPA under section 11.5.2 of its second set of advice to the EC on specific terms in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation (EIOPA-BoS-18/075). The questions (and ESMA's response) relate to the definition of AIF and the leverage calculation in the AIFMD and its implementing measures. More specifically, ESMA sets out its response to the following questions: (i) Are AIFs that use borrowing arrangements under Article 6(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) No 231/2013) or derivative instruments under Article 8(7) of Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) No 231/2013) considered to be "leveraged" under the AIFMD? (ii) Are AIFs that are managed by AIFMs as defined in Article 3(2) of the AIFMD (often referred to as "registered" or "sub-threshold" AIFMs) to be considered as AIFs as defined in Article 4(1)(a) of the AIFMD?
Read more

Investment Association updates guidance on charity authorised investment funds

On 3 August, the IA published an updated guide on CAIFs (dated July) and a revised version of its model trust deed (dated 31 July). The IA first published industry guidance on setting up a CAIF and the model trust deed in October 2016, which it had produced with the Charity Investors Group and the Charity Law Association. The contents of the guide are stated as having been reviewed by the Charity Commission for England and Wales and the FCA. The IA states in the guide that it endeavours to keep the guide up to date to reflect changes in processes. The IA has not announced how the latest version of the guide and deed have been updated.
CAIF Guide
Revised Model Trust Deed

INSURANCE

EIOPA joins Sustainable Insurance Forum

On 8 August, EIOPA published a press release announcing that it has become a member of the SIF. The SIF is a network of insurance supervisors and regulators from around the world working together on sustainability challenges facing the insurance sector. In July, SIF and the IAIS jointly published an issues paper on climate change risk in the insurance sector. In the paper, SIF and the IAIS call on the insurance sector to enhance awareness of climate change risk. EIOPA considers that the case studies on supervisory practice set out in the paper are of "high value" for all supervisors. EIOPA will consider transition and physical risks relating to climate change. It will also provide input from an EU perspective on taxonomy, fiduciary duty, governance, ORSA, as well as disclosure in the sustainable action plan it intends to publish in the autumn.
Read more

MARKETS AND MARKETS INFRASTRUCTURE

ESMA updates EMIR validation rules

On 9 August, ESMA published an updated version of its validation rules for the reports submitted under the revised technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR. The amendments are shown in red font. In a related press release, ESMA explains that it has updated the validation rules, with effect from 5 November, relating to the following fields: (i) reporting timestamp; (ii) reporting counterparty ID; (iii) ID of the other counterparty; (iv) underlying identification; and (v) confirmation means. ESMA last updated the validation rules in March.
Updated validation rules
Press release

Implementing Regulations supplementing BMR published in OJ

On 9 August, the following two Implementing Regulations supplementing the BMR were published in the OJ: (i) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1105 laying down ITS with regard to procedures and forms for the provision of information by competent authorities to ESMA under the BMR. Article 47(2) of the BMR requires competent authorities to provide ESMA with all information necessary to carry out its duties; and (ii) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1106 laying down ITS with regard to templates for the compliance statement to be published and maintained by administrators of significant and non-significant benchmarks pursuant to the BMR. Article 25(7) of the BMR obliges administrators of significant benchmarks that choose not to comply with one or more particular requirements of the BMR to publish and maintain a compliance statement stating why it is not appropriate for them to comply with those requirements. Article 26(3) of the BMR imposes a similar obligation on administrators of non-significant benchmarks, but regarding a broader range of requirements. The template for the Article 25(7) compliance statement is set out in Annex I to the Implementing Regulation. The template for the Article 26(3) compliance statement is set out in Annex II to the Implementing Regulation. Both Implementing Regulations are dated 8 August. They come into force on 29 August (that is, 20 days after publication in the OJ) and will apply from 29 October. The Implementing Regulations are based on draft ITS submitted by ESMA to the EC in March 2017.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1105
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1106

BCBS, CPMI, FSB and IOSCO second report on central clearing interdependencies

On 9 August, BCBS, CPMI, the FSB and IOSCO published their second report on central clearing interdependencies. The report analyses interdependencies between central counterparties (CCPs) and their clearing members and other financial services providers. The BCBS, CPMI, FSB and IOSCO sought to assess whether the findings of their first report, published in July 2017, were stable over time. They conducted another, more streamlined, data collection from the same 26 CCPs. The results are broadly consistent with the previous analysis and demonstrate that: (i) prefunded financial resources are concentrated at a small number of CCPs; (ii) CCP exposures are concentrated among a small number of entities; (iii) relationships mapped are characterised, to varying degrees, by a core of highly connected CCPs and entities and a periphery of less highly connected CCPs and entities; (iv) a small number of entities tend to dominate the provision of the critical services required by CCPs; and (v) clearing members and clearing member affiliates are also important providers of other critical services required by CCPs and can maintain several types of relationships with multiple CCPs simultaneously. The results also identify some changes to the interdependencies in central clearing, such as a decrease in the concentration of client clearing activity. In addition, initial margins from clients are now concentrated in two CCPs, compared with only one previously. The analysis is a useful starting point for understanding potential sources of systemic risk in central clearing and is intended to assist with the design of supervisory stress tests. It has also informed the policy work set out in the joint workplan to promote CCP resilience, recovery and resolvability.
Read more 
 
FSB, BCBS, CPMI and IOSCO consult on impact of G20 regulatory reforms on incentives to centrally clear OTC derivatives
On 7 August, the FSB published a consultation paper on the impact of the G20 regulatory reforms on incentives to centrally clear OTC derivatives. The consultation paper has been published jointly with the BCBS, the CPMI and IOSCO (the authorities). It has been produced by the authorities' DAT. In the consultation paper, DAT assesses how the G20 post-crisis reforms to the OTC derivatives markets are, directly or indirectly, relevant to incentives to centrally clear. It considers how these reforms interact and how they could affect incentives. In general terms, DAT has found that some aspects of regulatory reform may not incentivise the provision of client clearing services. Its analysis suggests that, overall, the reforms are achieving the goal of promoting central clearing, especially for the most systemic market participants. However, beyond the systemic core of the derivatives network of CCPs, dealers and clearing service providers, and larger, more active clients, the incentives are less strong. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data and market outreach suggests that the treatment of initial margin in the leverage ratio can be a disincentive for banks to offer or expand client clearing services. Bearing in mind the original objectives of the regulatory reform, DAT considers that additional analysis would be useful to further assess these effects. However, it notes that, ultimately, the final responsibility for deciding whether and how to amend a particular standard or policy remains with the body responsible for issuing that standard or policy. Comments can be made on the consultation paper until 7 September. The plan is to publish the final report around the time of the G20 summit at the end of November.
Read more

Updated version of GFXC's FX global code

On 6 August, the GFXC published a paper looking back over the first year of the FX global code, and also looking ahead. Looking forward, the paper highlights the GFXC's priorities, which include: (i) continuing its working group to strengthen FX disclosures, and its working group on "cover and deal" arrangements; and (ii) establishing a working group on buy-side outreach, and another to focus on embedding and integrating the code into the fabric of the FX market. An Annex to the paper contains feedback from market participants on local FX committees from all GFXC member jurisdictions on their experiences with the code to date, and their views on future work. The GFXC was established in May 2017 as a forum to bring together central banks and private sector participants, with the aim of promoting a robust, liquid, open and transparent FX market. The code, which was originally published in May 2017, comprises a set of global principles of good practice in the FX market.
Read more

FCA research report on EMIR data and derivatives market policies

On 6 August, the FCA published a research note on EMIR data and derivatives market policies. The note sets out the FCA's findings from assessing the impact of two EMIR requirements by making use of a sample of data reported to TRs, which has been made available to the FCA through the EMIR reporting obligations. Part 1 of the note considers options for recalibration of the scope of the EMIR clearing obligation for firms as part of the current EMIR review. Part 2 focuses on the impact of the phased-in implementation of the EMIR initial margin requirements. The FCA has found that: (i) a clearing exemption calibrated to minimise the number of counterparties that will be subject to the clearing obligation, while maximising the amount of activity that is captured, could significantly reduce burdens on those counterparties without compromising EMIR's overall objectives; and (ii) the phase-ins implementing the initial margin requirements do not result in the intended gradual increase in the number of counterparties subject to the requirements. Rather, there is a sharp increase (by about ten times) in the very last phase-in. The FCA notes that a full set of data on the derivatives market did not exist when the initial EMIR requirements and calibrations were implemented. This data is now available, through EMIR and other G20 reporting regimes, to EU and global regulators. As a result, authorities can make better informed policy decisions on how to set new thresholds and review the appropriateness of existing ones. The analysis set out in the note has been based on data available to the FCA as one of the relevant authorities. It believes that the EMIR review presents a valuable opportunity for similar analysis to be carried out on the wider EU data set. This will help to ensure that new and existing policies achieve their intended objectives in the most efficient and proportionate manner for markets.
Read more

ESMA updates MiFID II TTCs for equity derivatives, equities and equity-like instruments

On 6 August, ESMA updated its FAQs on TTC for equity derivatives, equities and equity-like instruments required under MiFID II and MiFIR. An accompanying press release explains that an updated version of the TTC has been published. The update relates to the TTC for: (i) equity derivatives I; (ii) equity and equity-like instruments; and (iii) tick size band assessment. Trading venues are expected to apply the new results from 13 August.
FAQs
Press Release

ECB consults on draft Regulation amending Regulation on money market statistics

On 6 August, the ECB published for consultation a draft regulation amending Regulation (EU) 1333/2014 concerning statistics on the money markets (the MMSR Regulation), together with an explanatory memorandum. The ECB has been collecting data on the euro money market since 1 July 2016 under the MMSR Regulation. However, experience gained since reporting began shows a need to clarify and simplify some of the existing reporting requirements, and to improve the quality of the data. In a related press release, the ECB explains that the draft Regulation will guarantee that transactions with all financial counterparties are covered under the MMSR Regulation. It will also further support the reporting of the LEI of counterparties, when one is available, to ensure that the data collection benefits from the extended mandatory use of the LEI in reporting in the EU. In addition, it will firm up the obligations of reporting agents to meet high standards designed to protect the integrity of information. The draft Regulation also specifies that the data collected may be used for the development and administration of an unsecured overnight interest rate. The draft Regulation states that it will enter into force 20 days after it is published in the OJ. Comments can be made on the draft Regulation until 10 September. The ECB will consider comments received while finalising the draft Regulation, and intends to publish a feedback statement.
Draft Regulation
Explanatory Memorandum 
Press Release

PENSIONS

Updated ESMA communication on clearing and trading obligations for pension scheme arrangements

On 8 August, ESMA published an updated communication on clearing and trading obligations for PSAs. ESMA is aware of the challenges that certain PSAs would face to start clearing their OTC derivative contracts and trading them on trading venues on 17 August. This is the date on which the current temporary exemption from the clearing obligation under EMIR expires. ESMA introduced the temporary exemption to allow time for a suitable technical solution for the transfer of non-cash collateral as variation margins to be developed by CCPs. With two extensions already granted, there is no possibility of further extending the temporary exemption. However, as there is not yet a suitable technical solution, the EMIR Refit Regulation includes a further extension of the temporary exemption for PSAs. The positions adopted by the EP and the Council of the EU on the EMIR Refit Regulation appear to support the view that a further extension of the temporary exemption is necessary. Negotiations on the EMIR Refit Regulation have not finished, and the resulting text is not expected to start applying by the time the temporary exemption applies. This means there would be a timing gap during which PSAs would need to start clearing their derivative contracts before they are, once again, no longer required to do so. They would also become subject to the trading obligation under MiFIR. From a legal perspective, neither ESMA nor NCAs have formal power to disapply a directly applicable EU law, or even delay the start of its obligations. Any changes to the application of EU law would need to be implemented through EU legislation (in this case, by amending EMIR as a result of the EMIR Refit Regulation). During the limited period of time that the temporary exemption does not apply, ESMA expects NCAs not to prioritise their supervisory actions towards entities that are expected to be exempted again in a relatively short period of time. They should generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their enforcement of applicable legislation in a proportionate manner.
Read more

New House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee inquiry into transparency around pension charges, investment strategy and performance

On 3 August, the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee published a webpage on a new inquiry into transparency around pension charges. The terms of reference for the inquiry are set out in a related press release. The inquiry will focus on whether the pensions industry provides consumers with sufficient transparency around charges, investment strategy and performance. It will examine whether enough is being done to ensure individuals: (i) get value for money for their pension savings; (ii) understand what they are being charged and why; (iii) understand the short and long-term impact of costs on retirement outcomes; (iv) can see how their money is being invested and how their investments are performing; (v) are engaged enough to use information about costs and investments to make informed choices about their pension savings; and (vi) get good value, impartial service from financial advisers. Written submissions can be sent to the committee until 3 September. This inquiry follows on from the committee's recent inquiry into pension freedom and choice.
Read more

PRUDENTIAL REGULATION

Clarification of certain aspects of procedure for supervising prudential requirements under CRD IV and CRR (ECJ)

On 7 August, the ECJ handed down a provisional version of its judgment in a preliminary reference concerning the interpretation of certain aspects of the procedure for supervising prudential requirements under CRD IV and the CRR. The case, before the Austrian courts, concerns a credit institution classified as a significant supervised entity under the SSM Framework Regulation. In 2014 and 2015, the Austrian FMA issued decisions under national banking law requiring the credit institution to pay "absorption" interest on the grounds it had exceeded the large exposure limits set out in Article 395(1) of the CRR. The credit institution brought an annulment action, arguing it is not required to pay such interest. Proceedings were stayed by the Austrian courts and a preliminary reference made to the ECJ, under which three specific questions were raised. In March, Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona issued his opinion in the case. Having regard to this, the ECJ ruled that: (i) Articles 64 and 65(1) of CRD IV and Article 395(1) and (5) of the CRR are to be interpreted as precluding national legislation that provides that, where the exposure limits set out in Article 395(1) of the CRR are exceeded, absorption interest is to be levied automatically on a credit institution, even if that institution fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 395(5) of the CRR under which a credit institution may exceed those limits; and (ii) Article 48(3) of the SSM Framework Regulation is to be interpreted as meaning that a supervisory procedure cannot be regarded as having been "formally initiated", either where a credit institution reports to the NCA that the limits set in Article 395(1) of the CRR have been exceeded, or where the NCA has already adopted a decision in a parallel procedure concerning similar breaches. In reaching this conclusion, the ECJ noted that, under Article 2(25) of the SSM Framework Regulation, only a procedure conducted by an NCA may be regarded as a "supervisory procedure" and such procedure is directed towards preparing the issue of a supervisory decision. In addition, as the Advocate General observed in point 89 of his opinion, the use of "formally" in Article 48(3) of the SSM Framework Regulation refers to an express decision to open the procedure, whatever the material grounds.
Read more

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

FCA consults on GFIN

On 7 August, the FCA published a press release announcing, in collaboration with 11 other financial regulators and related organisations, the creation of a GFIN, and the publication of a related consultation document. The network will seek to provide a more efficient way for innovative firms to interact with regulators as they look to scale new ideas. It will also create a new framework for co-operation between financial services regulators on innovation related topics, sharing different experiences and approaches. The consultation document outlines the key themes that have emerged during an initial informal consultation on the idea of a global sandbox and provides an update on the next steps of the project. The themes identified include regulatory co-operation and engagement, the time it takes to bring ideas to international markets, governance, and emerging technologies with notable cross-border application. Chapter 3 of the document sets out a mission statement that outlines the role the FCA anticipates GFIN will play in supporting responsible innovation. The FCA envisages that the GFIN could serve three main functions to: (i) act as a network of regulators to collaborate, sharing experience and best practice, and communicate to firms; (ii) provide a forum for joint policy work; and (iii) provide firms with an environment in which to trial cross-border solutions (B2C or B2B). The FCA explains in the remainder of the document why it believes that the three functions constitute an important part of the GFIN, and how it will potentially operate in practice. The deadline for responses to the consultation is 14 October. The FCA encourages a wide range of entities to respond including innovative financial services firms, financial services regulators, technology companies and providers. The FCA expects agreement on next steps, including a timeline for the launch of the GFIN, in the autumn. The press release lists the current GFIN members. The named organisations are committed to exploring the idea further, but the consultation process will help inform any future involvement. Similarly, regulators not named may decide to get involved in the future, or after the formal launch of the GFIN.
Read more

BoE policy finalises procedures for enforcement decision making committee

On 3 August, the BoE published a policy statement setting out the final procedures for the operation of a new EDMC. The EDMC will be the BoE's decision making body for contested enforcement cases within the statutory regimes operated by the BoE relating to prudential regulation, FMI, and resolution and note issuances (that is, all the areas in which the BoE has enforcement powers). It will strengthen the BoE's enforcement processes by ensuring a functional separation between its investigation teams and its decision makers in contested enforcement cases. The BoE consulted on proposals on the operation of the EDMC in a November 2017 consultation paper. It received three responses that supported the establishment of a unified EDMC, but raised questions relating to the independence of legal and administrative support available to the EDMC, the mechanism for determining whether a case is contested, and the ability to object to a specific panel member hearing a case. The BoE's feedback to those responses is set out in chapter 2 of the policy statement. In implementing the proposals to create the EDMC, it has been necessary for the BoE to delegate its decision making function relating to contested enforcement cases to the EDMC and to amend existing statements of policy and procedure to reflect the establishment of the EDMC. Accordingly, the following new and revised documents have been published alongside the policy statement: (i) Procedures - The Enforcement Decision Making Committee; (ii) Updated statement of policy: The Prudential Regulation Authority's approach to enforcement: statutory statements of policy and procedure. The amendments made to the statement of policy are shown in tracked changes in Appendix 2 to PS/EDMC2018; and (iii) Updated policy statement: Statutory statements of procedure in respect of the BoE’s supervision of financial market infrastructures.
Read more

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen & Overy LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen & Overy LLP
Contact
more
less

Allen & Overy LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.