Key Takeaways: Software Patent Prosecution Requires Data-Based Strategies Due to Patent Office Inconsistencies

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Kilpatrick Townsend attorneys Kate Gaudry, Ph.D. and Thomas D. Franklin recently presented at the Practising Law Institute’s 11th Annual Patent Law Institute regarding “Software/EE: Are We There, Yet?”.

Key Takeaways from the presentation include:

  • Patent-Eligibility Test – Poorly Suited for Consistency
    • Almost all software innovations are vulnerable to an abstract idea accusation under patent eligibility guidelines. For example, patent office examination guidelines indicate that a claim “comparing new and stored information using rules to identify options” is abstract.
    • Patent office instructions require a deep analysis of case law, although very few examiners are lawyers.
    • “Significantly more” qualification is ill-defined.
  • Post-Alice, Allowance Rates Vary
    • Allowance prospects in business-method art units where eligibility rejections are common are an order of magnitude lower than in other areas with similar technology.
    • Recently, business-method allowance rates have been inching higher (coinciding with management personnel change).
  • Crafting Strategies in View of Examiner and Art Unit Variability Improve Prosecution Results and Costs
    • There is no one-size-fits-all prosecution strategy, as examination tendencies vary
      across art units and over time.
    • Examiner statistics predict post-amendment allowance prospects.
    • Art unit allowance rates predict prospects of pre-decision allowances in appeal cycle.
    • Empirical data is useful to determine whether (and how) to file an amendment, appeal,
      abandon, etc.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.